coherent.fury

@HerbWiseman @iranidaturan @ConceptualJames 😂😂🤣🤣🤣

@iranidaturan @ConceptualJames Make better use of paragraphs.

Some of you might have noticed that there have been repeated attempts to create a "two-state solution" in Eretz Israel (or "Palestine" if you want) and that it never works. The primary reason it never works is that the "Palestinian" side of it and its terror groups reject it. The reason they reject it can be found in the 1988 Hamas Charter explicitly, which declares that they recognize the entire region as having been set aside as Islamic Waqf since the seventh century. This is a doctrine within Islam and Sharia and, as you should expect, the Muslim Brotherhood and its derivatives take it extremely strictly and literally. The doctrine of waqf is probably 98% of the reason why the Middle East is the way that it is with regard to the (modern) state of Israel, but almost nobody ever actually seems to recognize this. The doctrine of Waqf is roughly an Islamic land trust, although the "owner" of that land is taken literally to be Allah once it has been declared waqf. Since Allah "owns" it, it is fully "Dar al-Islam" (land of Islam) in a fully irrevocable, permanent, and inalienable way. No one can have any ownership of the land, but certain Muslims in good standing can hold stewardship of it. No one else can. It cannot be sold. It cannot be traded. It doesn't matter if it is conquered by a thousand armies. The land is viewed under Sharia as inalienably Islamic and belonging to Allah. The doctrine sees land under waqf as having been subdued or purified under Islamic doctrine. The land has been returned to its pristine state, in some sense. It is therefore regarded as an unholy defilement for anyone to make any claim upon the land, no matter how legitimate, old, or under any circumstances. To sell the land as a Muslim steward, especially to a Jew, is to incur a fatwa against you and your family (a capital offense). To occupy the land is the same. People who believe this in the way the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS, ISIL, etc., believe it, believe these things literally. They believe they have a holy obligation to murder anyone involved in what they see as a desecration of Allah's pristine Dar al-Islam land, and they act upon it. There is no possibility of compromise, partition, sharing, or any other such thing with people who believe this doctrine in this way. None. Ever. Under any circumstances. Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., believe that in the late 7th century when the Muslim Caliph conquered all of Syria-Palaestina ("Palestine") and declared it waqf (specifically in part so Jews could never return), that was final and irrevocable. The case is closed. There can never be so much as a serious discussion of any change. Therefore, when the Allies, particularly British and French forces, conquered the Ottomans in 1917 and issued the Balfour Declaration, effectively taking control of the land as conquered territory under their management ("British Mandate Palestine" and "French Mandate Syria"), they had absolutely no legal standing to do so under Sharia, from the Islamist perspective. They could conquer people but not Allah or his irrevocable claim on the land. When the League of Nations ratified the Mandates in the following years, the same. When the United Nations attempted to issue a partition in 1947, the same. When Israel declared independence in 1948, the same. When the Arab armies attacked and lost the next day, this did nothing to strengthen their case for legal occupation of the land. When a million attempted partition and two-state solutions were proposed only to be rejected by the Arab Palestinians every time, this is ultimately why. Almost all the rest is window dressing and taqiyyah. The issue is seeing the land as Islamic Waqf under Sharia, to which the Muslim Islamists have submitted. The Muslim Brotherhood (thus Hamas, etc.) doctrine on submission is that you fully accept all of this as I have stated it or you are not a real Muslim at all. You are apostate, and your life is in danger, if not forfeit, unless you will change your ways, perhaps under duress. Do you understand? Either you think this way, or the MB and its affiliate terror organizations do not recognize you as a Muslim to begin with, so your opinion is as irrelevant and moot as a Westerner, a Christian, an infidel, or a Jew. If you are taking the "Palestinian" side in these conflicts or see Israel as intrinsically the aggressor, provocateur, problem, etc., in the region, you are implicitly endorsing the Sharia and the doctrine of waqf that is the overwhelming primary reason for those beliefs. Full stop. You're supporting a view only intelligible under Sharia. Waqf, the idea of Allah owning land in religious trust, is a uniquely Sharia doctrine. It does not exist anywhere else. Israel obtained nearly all the land in Eretz Israel legally. The Allied Forces (that's us, fam) beat the Central Powers in WWI, including the Ottoman Empire, and took the entire region from them. All international law recognized it, including the League of Nations and later United Nations, and no serious challenge to that legal reality was ever made. Zionists bought land there, often from Ottoman landlords, and slowly moved in. Almost all immigration was legal with the only illegal immigration being during WWII when the British limited legal immigration in order to appease the Mufti. When Britain withdrew in 1947, the United Nations suggested the partition, and only the Arabs rejected it. Under every system of law that might apply except Sharia, the people we recognize as Israelis today moved in legally. It was not "settler occupation" except under Sharia. We are not under any obligation to recognize Sharia, or, therefore, waqf. We do not need to care what they believe about ownership of that land under their religious-political doctrine, especially since they try to hide the ball behind displacement, Arab nationalism, and some claimed right to self-determination (which they lost in wars that they always started, with the exception of WWI, which the Central Powers including the Ottomans started). The fig leaf they hide waqf behind here is this claim to self-determining pan-Arab nationalism, but what it actually means to have self-determination is to be able to determine the land is irrevocably theirs under Sharia because of waqf. If you don't recognize Sharia as legitimately binding international law, then you don't recognize the "Palestinian's" claim on the land of Eretz Israel, including Judea or Samaria (the "West Bank"), or Gaza for that matter (which was held by the Egyptians). Thank you for your attention to this matter!

@yatharthmann These people are miserable and love making others miserable.

Apparently chanting "USA!" is a "nationalist dog whistle". I'm glad this retard no longer works at SpaceX, I hope she was fired.

@WhiteHouse 🤣🤣🤣😂😂

Bye-bye 👋

From the woman who created the lie that data centers use vast amounts of water, comes a book proposing that the world should not use one of the best technologies ever invented for improving our lives.

Never Again is now, courtesy of a giant evil psyop and grifters producing shock content for imported Muslim audiences.

The “Epstein files” were always a psyop. That’s why no one in the Biden Autopen Administration released anything during the four years they had complete access to everything. That’s why it was never a factor nor a talking point until Trump took office… Bondi being incompetent didn’t help anything. If there had been anything in the files damning to any important persons on the right, they would have weaponized it under Biden to negatively affect the 2024 election. They would have burned fifty of their own to get one of Trump’s, because lefties that will vote in lockstep with the left are a dime a dozen. There’s an endless supply of socialist bartenders and foreign Islamists. Now it is being used by those once “loyal” to Trump to create division as they use anything they can to remain relevant, despite the silence from these same people during Biden’s DoJ. So yes, it’s an op… and it’s so disgustingly simple and idiotic that it should be obvious to anyone with a brain. If you ever thought anything was going to happen after Epstein was removed from the equation, you are naive and silly. This is only complicated if you are stupid.

The Left controls almost all of education now. They use a method called "critical pedagogy" (including "culturally relevant teaching") which is derived from something called "education for liberation." These methods selectively target and traumatize learners to make them moldable into a specific consciousness (namely, critical consciousness) and worldview (namely, late Western Marxism). They do not educate at all. Education is seen as a means to the real end of "awakening" and activation.

@Telegraph @lgb_alliance_ch 💪🏼

🎓 A Cambridge student who challenged “modern LGBTQ+ activism” at the Cambridge Union says a growing number of young people are privately rejecting gender ideology. Maeve Halligan argues women’s rights, gay rights and safeguarding concerns have been sidelined by a culture of ideological conformity on campus 👇 telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/2…

"It’s sometimes said that Marxism is dead… except in the universities... Extreme views are relatively common among faculty - and they’re more common today than they were twenty years ago." stevestewartwilliams.com/p/academias-le…

@RonWyden What percentage of other people’s earned money do you think you’re entitled to?

Let's make billionaires pay their fair share and find out

Politicians and economists assume that the Federal Reserve is vital. But @ryanmcmaken of @mises points out: “America's greatest periods… of economic growth and a rising standard of living was when there was NO central bank.” After we got the Fed… we got the Great Depression.

Requiring that 30% of these new high rise apartments be rented at a loss killed the project’s financial feasibility. Now 0 new apartments will get built and the 840 rich households that would’ve lived in those fancy new homes will bid up the price of older, cheaper apartments.

1/ 🧵 After the @nytimes “dog rape” story, we examined “human stories” Nick Kristof has published on Gaza. What we found is alarming. Sources presented as credible and apolitical supporting terrorism, don’t match descriptions – or may not exist. Did Kristof verify any of this?

All of these centralized organizations must be dismantled. Distributed computation always wins. What a spineless response from him!

Secretary Burgum says opposition to data centers is coming from "foreign source dark money." "The people that used to fight on climate change have shifted. They don't talk climate change because they realize it's a losing argument: 'I can't get people excited about one degree of climate change but man I can lie to them about why their electric bill went up.'" x.com/amuse/status/2…

@libsoftiktok I hope they leave. I hope they stop staying where they are not wanted. Please, just stop negotiating with people who need you while morally condemning you. Do not sanction your own destruction. Just shrug!

BREAKING: Mamdani is now reportedly meeting with CEOs and begging them to stay in NY following reports of a mass exodus of companies from NY after he practically declared war on the rich

I had to tell the head of my department — keep in mind, she holds a lot of power — that there are no “individual truths.” There is truth, and then there are people’s perceptions of it. This problem in academia is not limited to students, who are merely taught to think this way. It has reached faculty and leadership, too. And this is in STEM.