
Dragoș Mușetescu
639 posts

Dragoș Mușetescu
@dragosdm
I openly share my journey and lessons learned in building and growing businesses, with the hope of supporting and inspiring fellow entrepreneurs. #buildinpublic
Bucharest, Romania Katılım Nisan 2009
514 Takip Edilen499 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

I'm thrilled by the positive feedback on my efforts to enhance our hiring process. Today, I finally wrote an article about it. What are your thoughts? Any areas you think I should delve into more deeply?
lesscodeworks.com/how-we-redefin…
English

I love pi and after I saw @lucasmeijer love letter to pi I switched to html as output whenever I needed it.
Lucas Meijer@lucasmeijer
Been screaming this from the rooftops :)
English

HTML is the new markdown.
I've stopped writing markdown files for almost everything and switched to using Claude Code to generate HTML for me. This is why.
Thariq@trq212
English

Have you tried pi? I was a long term Claude user and switched a few months ago. I find myself opening Claude less and less.
How’s the in-terminal browser? I’m constantly switching from warp.dev to ghostty 😅. I have disabled all ai features in warp and since they’ve added side tabs it made a huge difference for my workflow
English

I think I’ve finally perfected my setup (ha! 😄)
- cmux as the terminal. I get Ghostty, plus a bunch of other nice things like an in-terminal browser and sidebars
- hunk as my core diff mechanism. I spend most of my time reviewing code, so optimizing for the diff experience makes a lot of sense. I am finding things like Cursor/Zed to be too bloated
- Codex or Claude Code with a custom AGENTS.md and a few custom skills
What am I misisng?

English


At Doist, we’ve always had a hands on leadership style. It’s also quite common in other orgs (e.g., Apple, Stripe).
From our handbook why we do this:
# Hands-on leadership
Doist's tenets relating to hands-on management are:
* Our leaders are functional experts who also do hands-on work.
* Leadership is a parallel track that you join if you enjoy and are good at working with people; these are the core incentives.
The core arguments of our way are the following:
* Some people move into leadership roles because they want to advance in their careers, not because they have a passion for the job. The usual result is awful leadership.
* We want you to lean on what you enjoy and what you are good at without feeling like you're making a compromise. And we want that to be true over time. Preferences can change!
* We are a small company and we want to remain this size for as long as possible, therefore every Doister has an impact on our goals and results. It is therefore vital that our leadership team is still making direct contributions to our squad work and day to day deliverables.
* An individual contributor (IC) can have the same impact and leverage as a people manager in creative fields. For example, most of the world-changing work that Jony Ive did at Apple was as an IC and not a manager (he designed many core products).
* We have seen that hands-on leadership results in fantastic outcomes at even large companies (e.g., Stripe is one of the other companies with this leadership philosophy).
* Various studies also confirm that employees are far happier when people lead them with deep expertise ([HBS Article](hbr.org/2016/12/if-you…)).
The hands-on management mantra also aligns with our core values:
* Mastery, because you can't master something without continuous hands-on work.
* Independence, because we want to have Doisters manage their work with little or no direction.
Some implications of this philosophy include:
* We are all hands-on and directly responsible for deliverables.
* We always hire functional experts, even for leadership positions.
* We optimize our structures and workflows to prioritize this, e.g., small teams and few direct reports for leaders.
IC work is any work that an IC could do; some examples:
* If there's a thread from a teammate (e.g., discussing a technical plan for their DO) and everyone's chiming in and writing a reply, it's hands-on work; when you write the monthly update, it's not.
* When reviewing PRs as part of random review roulette, it's hands-on work.
* When reviewing PRs for mastery track notes, it's not.
English

@amix3k I think it is very important to make sure that we do not outsource our thinking so that we can make sure we maintain and build: taste, judgment and trust.
English

We will work less and have a lot more.
For most of human history, people worked longer, harder, and under much harsher conditions than we do today. Every major technological revolution reduced drudgery, increased productivity, and enabled more people to enter higher-quality work and a better life. The transitions were messy, but the long-term impact was better jobs.
AI and robotics will do the same.
People are also not going anywhere. We will still want people accountable for outcomes. We will still value people who can exercise judgment, build trust, have taste, and decide what matters.
Less grunt work. More leverage. More abundance. That’s why I’m optimistic about the future! 😊
I feel like this is critical to share as there’s so much pessimism going around. We can build an amazing future.
English

Day 2 at @AIEMiami left me with one big takeaway: AI coding is no longer just about model quality. We’re moving from “LLMs that help write code” to “agent-driven software systems”.
English

@mitsuhiko shortcut to copy the last model message to clipboard
English

The context here is that we want to show something nice on the pi website of pi extending itself. Shouldn't be too big and confusing to understand! x.com/mitsuhiko/stat…
Armin Ronacher ⇌@mitsuhiko
What's the smallest (but comparatively coolest) extension you built for pi?
English

@aiDotEngineer Miami Day 1 had one clear message: The future of agents is boundaries, not authority.
Best ideas I heard:
- code > tool calls
- pipelines > mega-prompts
- skills/markdown > bloated abstractions
- agents should author artifacts, not touch prod
- secrets should never reach the model
Agents scale execution. They do not scale judgment. That’s now our job.
English

