DoubleE
7.1K posts

DoubleE
@erikephrim
For there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed, neither hid that shall not be known. - Luke 12:2
Connecticut, USA Katılım Aralık 2019
170 Takip Edilen762 Takipçiler
DoubleE retweetledi

Amazing rockety firey stuff.
Everyday Astronaut@Erdayastronaut
This photo from Flight 12 goes soooo hard!!!!!
English
DoubleE retweetledi



In Connecticut, if a gubernatorial candidate does not get the convention endorsement, does not get the 15% delegate threshold, and does not collect the major-party primary signatures, the practical alternatives are:
1. Get nominated by an existing minor party
A recognized Connecticut minor party can nominate candidates according to its own filed party rules. Connecticut law says a minor party nomination is made “in the manner prescribed in the rules of such party” filed with the Secretary of the State.
That means a candidate could try to obtain the nomination of a party such as the Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Green Party, Working Families Party, or another minor party if that party has ballot access for governor and chooses to nominate them.
2. Run as a petitioning candidate under a new party label or “no party”
Connecticut allows candidates not nominated by a major or minor party to get on the general-election ballot by nominating petition. The statute says a candidate’s name cannot be printed on the official ballot unless nominated by a major/minor party or unless a nominating petition is approved by the Secretary of the State.
For governor, the signature requirement is the lesser of:
1% of the votes cast for governor at the last election, or 7,500 signatures.
Since the 2022 governor race had well over 750,000 votes cast, the cap controls. So the practical number is:
7,500 valid signatures for a gubernatorial nominating petition.
English

@Betsy_McCaughey So why don’t you run as an Independent or Libertarian?
English
DoubleE retweetledi

Hello fellow patriots — I’m pushing ahead on Axing the Tax And launching a Connecticut Comeback. If you’re with me and want to fight side by side , let’s connect at Betsy@betsy2026.com What better time than as we honor our fallen heroes . 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
English

@erikephrim @Betsy_McCaughey @ryanfazio Who Is Ryan Fazio, .. Really?
erikephrim.substack.com/p/who-is-ryan-…

English

@Betsy_McCaughey @BetsyRoy181890 @ryanfazio I know exactly what happend and im going to write about it.
English

@BetsyRoy181890 @ryanfazio Bravo to Betsy Roy . You nailed it
English

Question: The NYT is reporting the regime change plan for Iran included reinstalling Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as leader.
Was that wise or practical?
Rep @jahimes: “Let me use the right word, which is insane. Right?…Ahmadinejad was a vicious extremist when he was president of Iran. He was leading the chants of Death to America, absolutely vicious. So the idea that putting him in place as a moderate leader. That's bananas.”
English

@erikephrim I guess we are witnessing in real time the division ➗ those of us that have known the
#ancientscriptures and what we know in our spirits these truths few have actually experienced!
English

There’s too much at stake to slow down! Together we’ll keep building on the progress we’ve made and we’ll keep delivering a more affordable Connecticut for all. Let’s make it happen, CT! #TeamLamont #NedforCT
English

What is the best possible future? This question is much harder to answer than it may seem.
Resist the Mainstream@ResisttheMS
Elon Musk: "Let's say you're praying to God and you ask for a given future. What future do you want God to give you? Probably, a future where there's amazing abundance for all."x.com/ElonClipsX/sta… "I think we want a future with love. That seems like a no-brainer. Peace is an interesting one because, you know, sometimes the price for complete peace may be too high because the complete peace may require too much suppression of the people."
English
DoubleE retweetledi

Administrative assistant for the city believe her feelings trump the rights of the citizens.
In this tense encounter, an independent journalist enters city offices to exercise a basic legal right: inspecting the public records index. Under Washington state law (RCW 42.56.070), this document is required to be available for public inspection. It’s not a favor; it’s the law.
Enter Sabrina Costik, an administrative assistant who claims to be "brand new" but is already attempting to rewrite the Constitution based on her personal feelings.
The exchange highlights a growing and dangerous trend in public service—the idea that personal "traumas and triggers" override the civil rights of the public. Throughout the video, Sabrina argues that:
Her "comfort level" should dictate where a citizen stands.
Her "liberties" are being violated by a camera in a government building.
Recording her is "incredibly rude," effectively prioritizing social etiquette over the First Amendment.
The situation required the intervention of Deputy Chief Matt McKnight of the Chehalis Police Department. In a masterclass of de-escalation and legal clarity, McKnight had to explain the hard truth to his own staff: when you are a public servant in a public building, you do not have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" while performing your duties.
McKnight—who is currently campaigning for Lewis County Sheriff—remained professional, but the core issue remains: Why are public employees being put behind counters without a fundamental understanding of the Bill of Rights?
As far as McKnight, he is running for sheriff in 2026 and his understanding and respect for the rights of the citizens is everything you would want in county sheriff.
That said, as far as Sabrina, when "I’m uncomfortable" becomes a tool to suppress transparency, the public loses.
English
DoubleE retweetledi











