EvienceOfFaith

65K posts

EvienceOfFaith banner
EvienceOfFaith

EvienceOfFaith

@EvidenceOfFaith

Standing for biblical truth in a confused world. Evidence, Scripture, and reason for the faith once delivered.

United States Katılım Aralık 2022
148 Takip Edilen5.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
Abortion is an abomination to the Lord.
English
0
0
1
12
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
The rejection of the supernatural is a rejection of God.
EvienceOfFaith tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
Again, made up things that have no basis. Even if you go to the early fathers whom Catholics love to quote, you would not find this claim or teaching. Most Catholics on this app are here for ragebait, not for spreading the gospel and making disciples. So pathetic and sad.
Catholic Drip 💧@CatholicDrip___

Was Mary assumed into Heaven??? God took Enoch and Elijah into Heaven The Mother of Christ was also brought up to God, as the Ark isn’t left to corrupt

English
0
0
0
22
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
I do not disagree it's about the bread and cup of the Lord. It's the argument you try to make that somehow Paul treating the supper as holy means Catholic transubstantiation and Roman mass are true. Paul actually clarified what he meant in 11:20-21: “When you come together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal. One goes hungry, another gets drunk.” Paul says about the supper that it “proclaims the Lord’s death until he comes” in verse 26. That is sacrificial language because it points to Christ’s sacrifice, NOT because Christ is being re-sacrificed on an altar. Also, Paul still calls it “bread” after the blessing: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread…” in 11:27 No eucharist.
English
1
0
0
15
𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦
Paul does call the Church Christ’s body in other places. But in 1 Corinthians 11, the immediate context is the bread and cup of the Lord. “Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup unworthily will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.” That is sacrificial language, not “you were rude at potluck” language. And if “discern the body” only means “be nice to fellow believers,” why does the offense make someone guilty of Christ’s body and blood?
English
1
0
1
13
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
@CatholicDrip___ The Bible is the Word of God because God speaks in it and Christ authenticates it. The apostles received and delivered it, prophecy confirms it, and the Holy Spirit bears witness to it.
English
1
0
0
6
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
@HenryPierzchala I don't take "wacks" , sir! I state facts with the hope people will actually start following the Scripture.
English
1
0
0
4
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
NO. No eucharist. A meal Paul’s rebuke in 1 Corinthians 11 is about eating in an unworthy manner, humiliating poorer believers, turning the meal into selfishness, and failing to discern the body (the church). In context, “the body” includes the gathered Church, because Paul repeatedly calls believers the body of Christ. Great comeback tho! At least you are engaging in good-faith arguments and not mockery. You are one of the few who would do that on this app, so my respect to you.
English
1
0
1
15
𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦
@EvidenceOfFaith So now we agree the Apostles gathered around the Eucharist. Good. The dispute is whether Paul meant a symbolic memorial when he warned people they could profane Christ’s body and blood and bring judgment on themselves. Symbols do not incur that language.
English
1
0
1
5
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
Trying to dunk on Sola Scriptura without knowing what it means. What it does NOT mean: - reject teachers, pastors, church history, councils, creeds, or tradition. What it DOES mean: - all of those must be tested under Scripture, because only Scripture is God-breathed and infallible
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo

Protestants be like: "We are Scriptures alone... 'Sola Scriptur'.... Nothing else matters" Same Protestants: "Repeat after me and you're saved"

English
0
0
0
17
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
Trying to dunk on Sola Scriptura without knowing what it means. What it does NOT mean: - reject teachers, pastors, church history, councils, creeds, or tradition. What it DOES mean: - all of those must be tested under Scripture, because only Scripture is God-breathed and infallible
English
0
0
1
10
Ojike Uzoma
Ojike Uzoma@Xtopher_Uzo·
Protestants be like: "We are Scriptures alone... 'Sola Scriptur'.... Nothing else matters" Same Protestants: "Repeat after me and you're saved"
English
6
2
13
390
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
I agree the apostles would gather around the Lord’s Supper to break bread and remember Christ’s death. That does not prove the Catholic Eucharist system where Jesus is being crucified over and over again, at every Sunday mass. It was once, and done: “It is finished.” John 19:30
English
1
0
0
13
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
@CatholicDrip___ The New Testament James (son of Zebedee) — Acts 12:2 — beheaded by Herod Agrippa. This is the most historically solid. Judas Iscariot — Matthew 27:5 / Acts 1:18 (two accounts that differ in detail) Paul alludes to his coming death in 2 Timothy 4:6
English
0
0
0
14
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
@PrayTheRosary If the rosary helps you pray, that's fine. Just don't pray to idols like Mary and Saints
English
0
0
2
38
Pray The Rosary
Pray The Rosary@PrayTheRosary·
Pray the Rosary everyday. Don't just post on X and be an online Catholic. Be real. Do the work.
English
59
100
968
27.1K
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
If you listen to Jesus's words, I believe there is. "And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come." Matthew 12:31-32
English
0
0
1
25
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
If you listen to Jesus's words, I believe there is. "And so I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come." Matthew 12:31-32
Isabella🇻🇦Aurelia@LighttheFireIAu

Is there no forgiveness for rapists?

English
0
0
1
43
EvienceOfFaith
EvienceOfFaith@EvidenceOfFaith·
@SteffyReefy @Arnie4USA Here, you hate filled human: x.com/TherionWare/st…
Therion Ware #FBPPR #FBPE #HPLHS@TherionWare

Reffy, this is marvellous. You were asked to explain the alleged “Jewish framework of thought”, step by step, and you’ve answered with an uncited AI screenshot about one rabbi. A triumph of the genre. Even if Morris Jacob Raphall used BCE and CE in his Post-Biblical History of the Jews, that would prove only that a Jewish historian preferred less confessionally Christian dating language in a work of Jewish history. It does not prove an organised Jewish attack on Christianity, unless your evidential standard is “a Jew once did something, therefore conspiracy”. The terminology is older anyway. “Common Era” and “Vulgar Era” were already part of scholarly usage long before your screenshot’s chosen villain. And, just to make this even funnier, Aleister Crowley’s preferred dating style often used “e.v.” - Era Vulgaris, the vulgar/common era. So unless you’re now arguing that Crowley was operating under a Jewish framework of thought, your little theory appears to have tripped over its own shoelaces and gone face-first into the pavement. The point remains painfully simple. BCE/CE preserves the same Christian-derived numbering. It changes the label, not the chronology. Nobody is stopping Christians saying AD. The rest of us are simply not obliged to make every historical date a tiny act of Christian confession. Now do the adult bit: explain who imposed this “Jewish framework”, by what institution, by what mechanism, and why a neutral academic convention counts as an attack on Christianity rather than just a refusal to make everyone else use your devotional vocabulary.

English
1
0
0
17
Arnie Hernandez
Arnie Hernandez@Arnie4USA·
Stop normalizing ‘Before Common Era’ (BCE) and ‘Common Era’ (CE). Our history is under the Gregorian Calendar by these two periods: 🔹 Before Christ (BC) 🗿 🔹 Anno Domini (AD) ✝️
Arnie Hernandez tweet media
English
555
2.3K
10K
194.5K