Facundo Rojas

Se acuerdan del "algoritmo de Yrigoyen"? 👇 1- Una cuenta libertaria inventa datos (falsos) y arma un mapa con ChatGPT tan mal hecho que ni siquiera tiene a la provincia de Tucumán. 2- Funcionarios del gobierno tuitean el mapa. 3- Milei retuitea a sus funcionarios. 🤦‍♂️

Dura carta de docentes de la Universidad de San Andrés tras la visita de Milei.

Zielinski, el hombre al que canjearon por un colectivo y triunfó sin marketing lanacion.com.ar/deportes/futbo…

Terrenos en litigio: la Procuración General de la Nación dictaminó a favor de la UNCUYO ⚖️ 👉La procuradora Laura Mercedes Monti reafirmó la sentencia de 2012 de la Corte Suprema y sostuvo que corresponde la íntegra restitución de los terrenos a la Universidad.

Salió en tapa de @LANACION el informe que armamos desde @fundarpoliticas sobre las empresas en el gobierno de Milei. Spoiler: es el peor inicio para un gobierno en los últimos 20 años, incluso peor que el pandémico inicio de Alberto Fernández.

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

Dramática la caída de la vacunación infantil en muchos países de Latam. Lo de Argentina es terrible

El ajuste de presupuesto del lunes en CyT por organismo:

Hay miles de ejemplos como éste, pero también se observa en la estadística oficial. Según la EPH, 2/3 de los estudiantes de la universidad pública pertenecen al 60% más pobre de la sociedad.

En Chile el metro es estatal y su construcción, una política de Estado que nunca interrumpieron con el argumento de que alcanzaba con hacer carriles exclusivos de colectivos.

Hay un punto fundamental en la discusión entre el Gobierno y las Universidades Nacionales. El oficialismo quiere imponer que la Sigen, que depende del Poder Ejecutivo -la Presidendia de la Nación- sea quien audite a las Altas Casas de Estudios. No es un problema semántico, es de

Año y medio atrás, la ministra designó a la española Eva Carrasco Bañuelos al frente del Colegio Mayor Argentino en Madrid. El único motivo de la designación es que es esposa del alemán @PhilippBagus , un fan de Milei que escribe libros mileístas y le entrega premios al presidente en cumbres de ultraderecha. Tuvieron que hacer una excepción legal para designar a una extranjera en un puesto político del Estado argentino y hacerla viajar de Madrid a Buenos Aires para formalizar el nombramiento. Carrasco gana €7.000 y va poco y nada a la oficina. Despilfarro, controles suprimidos y privilegio de casta.

entonces cóbrenle impuestos a los ricos

El gobierno no quiere una reforma de la educación pública universitaria, por ejemplo a la uruguaya, o por ejemplo mejorando los mecanismos de ingresos. Solo quiere destruir. Es un gobierno reaccionario, no reformista.

Compré una sal del Himalaya cuyo origen según el envase es de hace 240 millones de años y resulta que se vence ahora en octubre.

Dice que dice.

Fuertísimo

Si Milei hubiese aprobado el CBC sabría la diferencia entre político y partidario.

Recuerden, amigos, que odian la universidad no por lo que hacemos mal, sino por lo que hacemos bien. Odian que las públicas, con menos presupuesto, rankeen mejor que las privadas. Odian que tengan una voz que el mercado no controla. Odian que el hijo de un obrero pueda estudiar.

Para que vean que me involucro desde hace años en defensa de la educación pública. Lo que extraño gambetear así 🤣