Kat Kanada

521 posts

Kat Kanada

Kat Kanada

@kat57028

Katılım Ocak 2026
1K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Kat Kanada retweetledi
Dallas Brodie
Dallas Brodie@Dallas_Brodie·
Bill 20, the K'omoks Treaty Act, is a scam against British Columbian taxpayers. Tens of millions of dollars given yearly to a band of only 340 people. I broke the absurd numbers down in the Legislature when no other MLA would.
English
60
556
1.6K
26.1K
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
No. Going to stay right here with my Canadian passport and citizenship and there’s nothing you can do about it but cry from behind your anon avatar. 😎🥳
Kat Kanada tweet media
English
0
0
0
44
Kat Kanada retweetledi
Redd
Redd@ReddCinema·
in what situation would a kid ever need this??
English
1.5K
318
4.4K
11.7M
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
𝕏 Head of Product killed 𝕏. Everyone’s reach is gone. People are abandoning 𝕏 because of how bad the new algorithm has buried
AlphaFox@alphafox

Held a space today based on Elons request for feedback on the algorithm; There were 3400 who attended, accounts large and small, and pretty much everyone was in agreement on the issues at hand - here is a summary: Top Complaints About the X Algo Massive drop in reach & impressions — Especially painful for creators sticking to original content only. One user on a 2-week original-content experiment reported impressions tanked (down ~10,000% in some cases), almost no new followers, and reposts under 10 per post. Many said their posts simply “go nowhere” and they’re now afraid to post at all. The brutal 15–30 minute window — Content has a tiny early window to rack up engagement. If it doesn’t hit a hidden threshold right away, the algo basically kills its distribution. Users described it as make-or-break for any visibility. Followed accounts don’t appear — People have to manually search for accounts they follow because the algo and notifications no longer surface them reliably in the timeline. Monetization feels broken / unfair — Several called the payout system a “pyramid scheme” where money flows to a tiny group while most creators get little to nothing. There’s also fear of instant demonetization or shadowbans if you publicly criticize the platform. Demoralizing & exhausting — The constant roller-coaster of reach, hidden flags you can’t see, and lack of transparency makes many want to quit posting. One participant summed it up: “The whole platform is crap rn. Demoralizing and no point in participating.” Other Related Gripes That Came Up Premium customer support is non-existent (ignored tickets, auto-closed cases). The algo sometimes floods feeds with unwanted content (e.g., too much Elon-fan material). Bigger/established accounts feel penalized for having grown, while low-quality or unverified posts sometimes get random boosts. Overall tone: Frustrated but constructive — lots of creators who still love X but feel the current algo is actively working against them and killing incentive to create.

English
0
0
4
115
Kat Kanada retweetledi
Ian Miles Cheong
Ian Miles Cheong@ianmiles·
If you post more than 4 times a day your account will be penalized. Nikita Bier is destroying this platform.
English
135
22
221
78.5K
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
if "John loves Mary" written in the sand is a sure fire sign of intelligence behind it, then so is DNA — it's 1.3 BILLION letters long and contains a gargantuan amount of information, it's an instruction manual, it's a like a sophisticated computer code.
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey

How DNA gives evidence of a Mind at the origin of life: "We need at least two levels of explanation to account for living structures—a physical and an organizational explanation. This is best illustrated in the DNA molecule. The bases, sugars, and phosphates that comprise the nucleotides in DNA are ordinary chemicals and react according to ordinary chemical laws. Yet those same laws cannot explain the sequence of bases that spells out the message in DNA. In the words of chemist Michael Polany, the sequence of bases is “extraneous to” or “independent of” the chemical and physical forces in the DNA molecule. That is, the sequence is not determined by inherent physical forces. It is precisely this “physical indeterminacy” that gives the DNA molecule the flexibility to appear in a variety of sequences, like words on a page. And if physical forces do not determine the structure of the DNA molecule, then we need to search outside of physics for its organizing principle. We need a second level of explanation. This becomes clearer if we draw an analogy to human language. The words you read in a book are written in ink. Yet their sequence did not arise from the chemicals in the ink, nor from any chemical interaction between the ink and the paper, nor even from the electronic impulses in the computer when it was originally keyed in. The information is completely independent of the material medium used to store and transmit it. Exactly the same reasoning applies to the information in DNA. It is independent of the material medium—the strand of chemicals—used to store and transmit it. If we knew how to translate the message encoded in a DNA molecule, we could write it out using other material. We could write it in Magic Marker, in crayon, in finger paint. We could even write with a stick in the sand. And it would still be the same message. Changing the material medium does not change the message. Information is independent of the material substance that stores and conveys it. And because a message is independent of the material medium, it does not originate from the medium. The DNA message does not originate in the chemistry of a DNA molecule—any more than the text in a book arose from the paper and ink used to print it. Yet that is precisely what the reductionist maintains. He proposes that the forces in the chemicals themselves originated the information in DNA. This is tantamount to saying that the ink wrote the words in a book, that the ink molecules spontaneously organized themselves into a complex arrangement of words and paragraphs. In reality, of course, the words on this page were constrained by the principles of the English language—rules of grammar, interpretation, and sentence construction—along with the rules of logic and reasoning. By the same token, Polanyi argues, the information in the DNA molecule is constrained by special organic rules and principles—principles not reducible to the laws of physics and chemistry." (from The Soul of Science)

English
0
3
7
785
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
Christianity will be the only religion govt’s ever persecute. Ever wonder why that is? 🤨
Kat Kanada tweet media
English
0
3
3
153
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
Today is unbearable. 🖤
English
0
0
2
164
Kat Kanada
Kat Kanada@kat57028·
God, Please use this tragic moment to achieve your good and perfect plan. Please use this pain for good the way only You can. Amen. ✝️🤍🕊️
English
0
4
7
245