JackDaPic

PulseChain, PulseX, HEX, ProveX all have more potential for maximum gains than Bitcoin does, because BTC has a 1.6 Trillion dollar market cap already. It's been around for 17 years already. You are not an early adopter in $BTC. Those 4 coins all do things that BTC can't. PulseChain has better potential, better technology, higher throughput, lower fees, is more secure, and is less owned by governments and banks to boot. HEX did a 10,000x in price in the last 10 years and doesn't make electricity companies and mining hardware manufacturers rich at the cost of the price. PulseX removes middlemen from trading, its just you and the code. ProveX uses zero knowledge tech to enable peer 2 peer trading and issue other kinds of proofs. Better potential, better tech.

When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure. Not hype. Not another token. Not another chart. Infrastructure. Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable. PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one. So that’s where I focused. It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app. But a lot of projects depend on it. That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done. At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces. Software is like an onion. There are layers upon layers. Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks. Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it. And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them. That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on. That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases. There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong. But infrastructure has to be agnostic. If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.” That is not how we grow. A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer. That is not always easy. But I think it matters. And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things. I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction. But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that. The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all. If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better. That is how this should work. And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows. That is how you grow. That is how you get taken seriously as a chain. In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong. That is part of why I’m building Cappy. If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions. I am building the wallet I personally would want to use. That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible. There is no single perfect answer for everyone. But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it. A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really. I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time. Maybe I was wrong to expect that. Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning. Either way, it is what it is. At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist. That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else. That is fine. You can dislike the software I write and not use it. It really is that simple. But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important. People ask, “What about Sigma?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?” That is exactly the point. These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch. Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly. And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them. I am not randomly jumping between projects. I am building the layers that make the next layer possible. I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not. What I do know is that I am at least decent at software. So that is where I am putting my energy. I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing. Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No. Do I respect what he has built? Yes. Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes. Those things can all be true at the same time. I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from. Many of you support me, and I see that. I do not take it lightly. All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can. Not because everyone has to use it. Not because I think I am the answer to every problem. Not because I agree with every project. But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces. That is what I am trying to do. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.

@iambroots @cz_binance @cryptomanran T’es gay

Man ya’ll actually think RH cares about you that much anymore that he will do something for your #Pulsechain bags? @cz_binance is the G.O.A.T @cryptomanran is the 2nd G.O.A.T. For giving RH a platform opportunity for the 2nd time. But I don’t think RH knows how to pump his bags anymore.

@GordonGekko @cryptomanran @RichardHeartWin Suuu

@cryptomanran @RichardHeartWin This sounds WILD Ran

Hey @RichardHeartWin …. Let’s do it.

@cryptomanran @RichardHeartWin Salut

"speak English" but I like pictures #PulseChain

@izzohodwar @spond Yes

@WhalePulse 2.1b pas 15k, plus important

ProveX should do 750k USD volume to burn 15k, daily ...

@BillyM2k PulseChain

The SEC tried to take him down. They failed. Interpol came next. His tokens are down 95% but his community is still here. Nobody has told this story honestly. Until now. The spam king turned rumored crypto billionaire turned international fugitive who somehow still hasn't lost. The good, the bad, and why PulseChain isn't going anywhere 🧵 Full article 👇 #PulseChain #HEX #RichardHeart

@RichardHeartWin Christine Lagarde AMLD5

Which specific humans outside of crypto and humans at specific entities do you think have done lots of damage to crypto?

@DeFiTracer Tu sens mauvais

🚨 BREAKING: 🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SAID THAT $BTC AND CRYPTO MARKET BILL WILL BE APPROVED SOON HE CONFIRMED THAT THIS BILL WILL INJECT TRILLIONS INTO THE MARKET GIGA BULLISH FOR CRYPTO!!

@DoubtToken Pourquoi tu vends alors?

The 2024 $INC surge on PulseChain showed its potential for massive, rapid gains. In under 2 months, it delivered an over 20x return, surging from $0.45 to just over $10! 👀 We're at almost the exact same price that kicked off that monster move, with INC currently trading at $0.46. 🕵️ Will we see a repeat of this move in 2026? 🤔

I don't like the idea that a person's skin color makes them untrustworthy, nor their parents nationality, nor where they were born and hence, what passports they ended up with. Seems quite un-American. As you say, your last name is Szabo, and while you jest you don't mind if people trust you less because of it, I don't think it's fair or just. The founders of the United States weren't United States citizens at all. It's not a good heuristic. It's similar to saying that if you have a USA passport only, we can trust you more, but I think you'd agree that quite a few USA passport holders ain't trustworthy. There are many countries that have actually enacted your purity test idea. There's a whole wikipedia article on it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_…

Coinbase was down. PulseChain, PulseX, HEX, Pump dot tires, ProveX were up. Show respect.

@LibertySwapFi @zkxwallet This check out ✅️

@EmmanuelMacron The majority of the $69B datacenter investment in France is based on a UAE intention that is neither finalized nor binding. Given the anti-tech stance of your 🤡 government, it would be a miracle if this investment ever materializes.

@anndylian Bla bla bla

@anndylian Non, il faut acheter hex, perdre 99% et faire x10000

Is starting a project the best way to become a crypto millionaire? Answer: _____