mandem

That is the way to go !

Saint Hippolytus of Rome taught that the Antichrist will rebuild the temple in Jerusalem, and temporarily restore the kingdom of the jews. Hippolytus believed that the Antichrist will be an Israelite born from the tribe of Dan. He stated that the Antichrist will rebuild the stone temple in Jerusalem and hand it over to the jews. By performing magical signs, lying wonders, and emulating the life of Christ, the Antichrist will deceive the jewish people into believing he is the true, long-awaited Messiah. He will briefly set up the kingdom of Judah and demand that humanity worship him as God before being destroyed by Christ's Second Coming. Jews hate Rome.

@ChMeggle @Plbien1 @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Sous Macron, la France a constitutionnalisé le droit à l’IVG en 2024 et il a aussi lancé une réforme de la fin de vie vers une « aide à mourir »...

@mandem71029974 @Plbien1 @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Emmanuel Macron n’est pas un tueur sanguinaire.

Alors, Madame @xfedorova , quand allez-vous accepter de parler à @AmourskyCyrille qui vous a proposé un debat sur @CNEWS, la chaîne qui vous emploie ?

@Morphomerle @ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Encore faut-il permettre les conditions de la contraction...

@ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS En tant que vraie russe, @xfedorova a tout simplement peur de la contradiction 😂😂😂

@Plbien1 @ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Soutenir Macron alors...

@ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Soutenir l'invasion de l'Ukraine, c'est pas une opinion, ça devrait être OQTF sur le champs

@Lovanium2024 @ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS Si elle détestait la contraction, pourquoi l'interdire de parler alors...

@ChMeggle @xfedorova @AmourskyCyrille @CNEWS @xfedorova déteste la contradiction, elle va très probablement vous bloquer sur X mais continuer de s'exprimer sur @CNEWS ... 😂

@edouardhusson @EmmanuelMacron quid?

Dire qu'il est nécessaire de rappeler de telles évidences dans la France de 2026 !

@e_l_g_c_a @ShoahUkraine Also, if there is a coordinated, continent‑wide plan to annihilate the Jews, why is there no clear, written decree or public order that spells that out in plain language? The answer is that there is no such decree or public order and historians explicitly admit this.

@e_l_g_c_a @ShoahUkraine The Wannsee Protocol itself does not contain an explicit sentence like “exterminate/kill/eliminate the Jews,” and there is no surviving written order from Hitler that openly says “I order the extermination of all European Jews.”

This is one of the most important articles I've spent weeks to research and write that proves the following thesis : The Holodomor Was Not an Ethnic Genocide. Part 1: The Specific Claim at Stake: The Holodomor was not an ethnic genocide in the sense that the Holocaust was. The Nazi state identified Jews through racial laws based on ancestry, applied its destructive policy to Jews regardless of class or political behavior, built dedicated extermination infrastructure, and documented its intent openly in its internal records. None of these conditions was present in Soviet Ukraine in 1932-33. The Soviet state did not define Ukrainians as a racial enemy, did not apply its policy on the basis of Ukrainian ancestry, did not build dedicated machinery for Ukrainian destruction, and did not document any such intent. The man who first argued the famine was ethnic genocide, Robert Conquest, abandoned the thesis before he died. The Soviet apparatus that enforced the famine in Ukraine was staffed at every level by ethnic Ukrainians. Kazakhs, under the same Soviet collectivization policy, died at three times the proportional rate of Ukrainians without anyone calling that genocide. The regime that allegedly destroyed Ukrainians as a nation had spent the preceding decade aggressively building Ukrainian-language schools, publishing, and party institutions, and would spend the following decade expanding Ukrainian territory, granting Ukraine an independent United Nations seat, and presiding over Ukrainian demographic recovery. The internal documents of the Soviet state from 1932-33 do not speak of destroying Ukrainians. They speak of class war and grain procurement. Every major archival historian who has worked the post-1991 Soviet record (Davies, Wheatcroft, Tauger, Cameron, Pianciola) has rejected the ethnic genocide thesis. This article examines the evidence against it. The famine that swept the Soviet Union in 1932-33 killed millions. The best demographic estimates place Ukrainian losses between 3.5 and 5 million, with comparable proportional devastation in Kazakhstan and mass mortality across the Volga, the North Caucasus, the Kuban, and Western Siberia. It was caused by Soviet policy: forced collectivization, ruinous grain procurement quotas, and an ideological refusal to relieve the catastrophe as it unfolded. Stalin and the Soviet leadership are responsible for these deaths. None of that is in dispute here. What is in dispute is something far more specific. The claim that the Holodomor was an ethnic genocide, that Stalin engineered the famine to destroy Ukrainians as a national group, is a much narrower historical and legal proposition. It is the thesis of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), of Timothy Snyder's Bloodlands (2010), and of Anne Applebaum's Red Famine (2017). It has become the official position of the Ukrainian state and, increasingly, of Western parliaments. It is also wrong. The evidence (geographic, demographic, institutional, and documentary) does not support it. The most rigorous archival historians of the famine, working from materials unavailable to Conquest, have rejected it. The post-Soviet opening of the archives, which the genocide camp expected would vindicate the engineered-famine thesis, produced the opposite result. What follows is the case against the ethnic genocide reading, point by point, set against the strongest evidence and historians the opposing camp can muster.

@Loursronchon @LaurentDBE @xfedorova m.youtube.com/watch?v=YvPMnS…

@Loursronchon @LaurentDBE @xfedorova "Faire la propagande de Poutine ce n'est pas vraiment de la liberté d'expression " Tout est propagande dans les affaires humaines. Quelle est la propagande qui autorise la liberté d'expression? Faire la propagande de Macron ?

Pourquoi tant de haine à l’égard de @xfedorova ? Elle est russe et sans aucun doute favorable à la Russie. Et alors ? Pourquoi la liberté d’expression ne devrait-elle pas être protégée dans son cas ? Je rappelle que nous ne sommes pas officiellement en guerre avec la Russie. Tout intervenant médiatique exerce une forme d’influence, quelle que soit sa sensibilité ou ses convictions. On ne devrait pas pratiquer de discrimination fondée sur les opinions politiques ou les origines.

Il existe aujourd'hui en France une étrange conception de la liberté d'expression. Elle est célébrée, invoquée, brandie comme une valeur absolue, mais seulement à condition qu'elle serve les bons discours, les bonnes causes, les bons camps. Dès qu'une voix s'écarte du récit dominant, dès qu'elle ose contester une version officielle, le réflexe n'est plus le débat, mais l'interdiction.

@rose1_flamingo @xfedorova Bobo colobo ? Paresse intellectuelle ? Le manicheisme c'est pour les NPCs.

@xfedorova Ce que vous faites ne relève pas de la liberté d'expression mais du parti pris, la manœuvre politique, du relais local en faveur d'1 régime autoritaire se vautrant dans le crime de guerre Crimes de guerre, ça vous inspire qque chose? Ce truc qui brise les gens et leurs libertés

@Chibani43804875 @xfedorova Pratiquement tous les autres grands médias français, c'est l'extrême centre mondialiste et subventionné. Bonjour la nuance.

@xfedorova Quelle HONTE !! La liberté d’expression à la Boloré !

@Patou01000011 @xfedorova "Le problème ce n'est pas que vous ayez un avis différent, mais que vous propagez les mensonges du Kremlin, sans nuance ni contradictions." Qui décide ce qui est de la bonne et de la mauvaise propagande? Caligulette ?

@xfedorova Le problème ce n'est pas que vous ayez un avis différent, mais que vous propagez les mensonges du Kremlin, sans nuance ni contradictions. En Russie vous seriez en prison pour avoir fait moins de la moitié de ce que vous faites en France, mais c'est la France le problème... 🤔

@MARCLANDES40 @xfedorova Toujours aussi bouché alors?

@xfedorova Tiens revoilà l’agent Russe !! DEHORS!!

@xfedorova C'est comme d'écrire democracy sur l'institution la plus antidémocratique qui soit.

@maximumpain333 That level of crystalline antisemitism...

THE END OF SOUL CONTRACTS Have you noticed it lately? The tension. The unraveling. The sudden coldness or distance in once-familiar relationships. It might feel like the people you've known for years are suddenly speaking a different language. Or maybe you’re just no longer able to pretend that you share the same values, outlook, or even sense of reality anymore. If this resonates with you, you’re not alone. What you're experiencing is part of a deeper shift. One that many in the spiritual community have come to know as the end of soul contracts. Over the past few years, the energy on Earth has been rising in intensity. Wave after wave of higher frequency light is flooding the planet, triggering deep awakenings, inner clearings, and the collapse of anything not in alignment with the truth of who we really are. And with that, many of the karmic bonds, agreements, and entanglements that kept certain people in our lives are naturally dissolving. This isn't punishment. It’s not betrayal. It's quantum realignment. We are frequency beings living in an energetic universe. As your soul evolves and your vibration rises, you're naturally going to move out of resonance with people who are choosing to remain in fear, control, or ego-based patterns. This includes old friends, family members, long-term partners, and even spiritual teachers or mentors. You’re not doing anything wrong. You’re simply no longer a match. Some of these relationships were rooted in karmic lessons that have now been learned. Others were soul contracts created before this lifetime to help us awaken, challenge us, or remind us of our worth. Once the purpose is complete, the contract dissolves. Clinging on only causes pain. It can feel like grief. It can feel like confusion. And it can feel like guilt. But here's the truth: These relationships are already expired in the higher realms. You are simply catching up with the energetic reality. This part of the journey is rarely easy. It takes courage to walk away when society teaches us to keep the peace, stay loyal, or "stick it out." But in 5D consciousness, love doesn’t mean staying silent or small. It means honouring the truth of your soul. Sometimes, the most loving thing you can do is to let go. You don’t need to make it dramatic. You don’t need to prove your point. You don’t need to explain your awakening to those who haven’t yet remembered their own. Just allow the separation to unfold naturally, with as much compassion and clarity as you can. Bless them. Release them. Thank them. Then keep walking. Because just beyond the pain of these endings is the beauty of something new: soul-aligned friendships, deep spiritual partnerships, collaborations that light up your purpose, and a sense of belonging you may have never truly known until now. Your Soul Family is waiting for you on the other side of these expired contracts. And you’ll recognize them not by how long you’ve known them, but by the way they feel: safe, expansive, familiar, even ancient. Let yourself evolve. Let the old fall away. You are not abandoning anyone. You are just honouring the contract you made with yourself first. And let’s be clear: this path does not make you superior, more awakened, or better than anyone else. Just like a grandparent isn’t better than a toddler, we simply hold different experiences at different stages of the soul’s unfolding. Some are just beginning their human journey, and others have walked this path many lifetimes. Some may even be returning ascended masters in disguise, assisting the collective shift. All are valuable. All are sacred. Every soul is here for a reason.

The Miraculous Medal is a small oval sacramental that originated from a series of apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary to Saint Catherine Labouré in Paris in 1830. A young novice with the Daughters of Charity, Catherine experienced several visions in the convent chapel on Rue du Bac. The most significant occurred on November 27, when Mary appeared standing upon a globe with rays of light streaming from her hands, crushing a serpent beneath her feet. An inscription encircled the image: O Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee. Mary instructed Catherine to have a medal struck according to this model, promising that those who wore it with confidence would receive great graces. On the reverse side the design features a large M surmounted by a cross, with the Sacred Heart of Jesus crowned with thorns and the Immaculate Heart of Mary pierced by a sword, surrounded by twelve stars representing the apostles. The first medals were produced in 1832 amid a cholera epidemic in Paris, and reports of healings, conversions, and protections spread rapidly. What began as the Medal of the Immaculate Conception soon earned the name Miraculous Medal because of the extraordinary favors associated with it. A Church inquiry in 1836 affirmed its supernatural character, and devotion spread worldwide. Far more than jewelry or a charm, the medal serves as a visible sign of trust in Mary's intercession and a reminder of the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, which would later be defined as dogma in 1854. Worn around the neck or carried with faith, it invites the wearer to prayer and reliance on God's mercy through the Mother of Christ. Millions have embraced it across cultures and centuries, finding in its simple form both comfort in trial and encouragement in daily life. Its enduring power lies not in the medal itself, but the awakening in the wearer to follow Mary's admonition to "Do whatever He (my Son) tells you." (Jn 2:5)

@OzKaterji In 140 years, this post will not have aged well either.

For those who think that Russia is winning the war in Ukraine, if Russia was to keep advancing at this rate, it would take 140 years for the frontline to reach Kyiv. That’s not a typo. 140 years.