Nunya biddness
786 posts


Brad Pitt was so cocky that he stopped a take without Tarantino’s permission in mid scene and Tarantino almost lost it
“The look on Quentin’s face, I mean, he was insanely grave.”
“Brad, what did you just do?’”
Tarantino asked Pitt.
Pitt said, ‘Well, I cut the camera.’
Tarantino said, ‘Never again in your life will you ever cut a camera or you’ll be dead in this business. That’s my domain. Don’t stop behavior.’”
English

‘Please leave my property now or you will be trespassing, and I will call the sheriff and have you arrested.’ That’s all you need to say. What they’re doing is legal unless you tell them to leave, then it’s illegal! If they had legal standing to come inside they would’ve done so, most likely with much more backup than this.
English

A Palm Beach County man firmly invoked his Fourth Amendment rights when police and a family services worker arrived without a warrant for a welfare check on his young daughter.
Speaking calmly through his intercom with cameras recording, he asked if they had a warrant.
When they said no, he refused to open the door or wake his sleeping child, told them it was harassment, and ordered them to leave. The officers departed without entering.
English

@leegee010 @RealEmirHan I loved it, especially when he changed history to assure the Tate murders never happened. Some true revenge porn type of shit!!!
English

@RealEmirHan I’m a fan of Tarantino, but this film is proper shit…
English

@liquid2ulu I mean, I am pretty much libertarian, but that is a poorly worded question at best. I have no idea what he is getting at.
English

Anyone remember that time that Bernie tried debating a libertarian?
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders
Mr. Bezos: Let's have that debate. Under my 5% billionaires wealth tax, we'd: -Give $12K to a working family of 4 -Expand Medicare for dental, vision, hearing -Guarantee universal childcare -Raise starting teacher pay to $60K And you'd still be worth $269 billion after taxes.
English

@WolfgangRichtEU @verynotserious @IfindRetards Dear @WolfgangRichtEU at first I was all WTF but then I LOLd -so subtle
English

@verynotserious @IfindRetards Dear Seriously,
I don't think your mother would like me to cheat on her.
Have a wonderful day,
Wolfgang
English

Australian trans woman Roxanne Tickle sued women only app Giggle for Girls after being banned (AI flagged her as male). Court ruled it was indirect discrimination—sex is "changeable," not strictly biological. Giggle lost, paid damages. Appeal decision today upheld it and doubled the damages.

English

@Michael_P_USA @WallStreetApes “Save on printing! Simply post a positive review on twitter and save 2% off next month’s subscription fee! That’s FIVE FREE PAGES “
- Act now for this awesome incentive, only at @HP
English

American bought a brand new printer. She bought the ink for the printer, she bought the paper for the printer, now she’s at home and is ready to print
She can’t print
“They remotely shut off my printer until I paid $7.50 cents to print in my own home, to print on my printer, that I own in my home”
This is the new $7.50 subscription plan by HP Printers
Here’s how the plans work
HP’s Instant Ink and newer All-in Plan programs are subscription services options:
- You pay a monthly fee based on pages printed (not ink used).
- Plans start low, from $1.79–$7.99 per month for 10–100 pages
- $7–$8 per month plans are for around 100 pages
If your payment fails. HP will remotely shutoff your printer
English

@Markzam_x @XFreeze Thanks for your reply. It gives me something to think about
English

Bitcoin. Is neutral. It doesn’t care if you’re young or old, male or female, rich or poor, Christian or Muslim, black or white, Dollars or Rands.
Bitcoin offers a refreshing departure from polarised narratives.
I have investments in Bitcoin. I tried alt-coins and got burned.
I don’t offer financial advice. It’s important to research Bitcoin and make an informed decision.
If you are not in Bitcoin and want to know more. I can refer you to material that will help you understand.
English

Raptor 3 is engineering black magic
SpaceX’s Raptor is the FIRST full-flow staged combustion engine to ever fly - only the 3rd ever built (after the Soviet RD-270 and the 2000s US demo that never flew)
→ Both fuel-rich + oxidizer-rich preburners
→ 100% of propellant through the turbines before the main chamber
→ Auto-ignites from hot preburner gases (no Merlin igniter fluid)
→ Record 350 bar chamber pressure
Raptor 3 goes even crazier:
Everything internalized with regenerative cooling. No heat shields. No fire suppression system. Saves 10+ tons
This is how Starship becomes rapidly reusable

English

@ConservCoach44 @1stclassclips There it is the tolerant left blatantly ignoring the LAW and just screaming insults! I won’t tolerate the hatred. Blocked!!!
English

@XFreeze The irony is that just about zero of your countrymen have the faintest idea of just how ground breaking this technology is.
Wilful ignorance is the disease that prevents progress and feeds regress.
Those who carry this mental affliction always blame others for their plight.
English

@WutrainS @prairie_observe @Breaking57 ALLEGEDLY gave them a hard time! Since this is THE Phillip Turner, I would say the he most definitely did NOT give anyone a hard time…
English

@prairie_observe @Breaking57 That case is completely different. This person went into a dance studio/ Ballet and gave the people a hard time. The court case you referenced had to do with a police station.
English

He also doesn’t have to ID based on this situation, and he should know; there is case law in Texas. Look up Turner v Driver… the guy filming is Phillip Turner! And while you are correct about shutting up, for most people that’s a wise move. For him, he asks pointed questions to help establish foundation for any future litigation, should it come to that.
English

@Breaking57 Whatever your views on this behavior, if you are this guy, why are you talking? Just give them your ID & don’t answer any questions. They can detain you & speak to witnesses but you don’t have to say a word.
English

@thesincerevp @elonmusk Guess he should just pack it in then, and let innovators like yourself lead the way!
English

@babytinkrbell @MarioNawfal I’m glad they posted this and disseminated the info, thank you as well for clarifying the timeline
English

@MarioNawfal Why are you posting this? He got them back today
English

@chadswift6 @DarkSevariant @Tutrifour @ grok how would insurance work in this scenario? Would the cyber trucks insurance be involved? What are the financial issues, as well as legal and insurance rate issues ?
English

@mikehod25 @DarkSevariant @Tutrifour Ya that's not how it works. The person at FAULT pays for all the damage their action caused. If you watch the video the CT did stay in the lane and take the hit. The momentum and tire blow out forced it into the other lane.
English

Last night was the biggest disaster in the history of Tesla.
Let me walk you through what actually happened on that earnings call, because the headlines are doing you a disservice:
Elon Musk got on the call and admitted (his words) that Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capability to achieve unsupervised FSD."
He said he wished it were otherwise. He said the memory bandwidth is one-eighth of what Hardware 4 has. And that's the end of the conversation.
Approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles on the road right now have Hardware 3. Many of those owners paid $8,000 to $15,000 for Full Self-Driving capability based on Musk's repeated promises (going back to 2016) that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. As recently as 2022, Musk was publicly assuring owners that HW3 had the processing power to get it done.
BUT IT DIDN'T
Those promises are now officially broken.
The solution is a "discounted trade-in" toward a new car with Hardware 4.
Not a refund or a free upgrade...
A discount on buying ANOTHER Tesla.
Investor Ross Gerber said it too - all HW3 owners got screwed, and with roughly 285,000 FSD purchasers affected, the potential liability runs into the BILLIONS.
But that's not even the worst part.
Musk was asked if the current FSD v14.3 was ready for unsupervised deployment. He said yes. Then immediately walked it back and admitted Tesla has "major architectural improvements" in the pipeline that would significantly improve safety.
What he really means: the software isn't SAFE ENOUGH to deploy without a human watching. Full unsupervised FSD for consumer cars is pushed to Q4 2026. At the earliest... Maybe.
How many times has this deadline been pushed? I've lost count. And trust me, I've seen a lot of broken promises. But this one takes the cake.
Now let's talk about the numbers everyone is celebrating:
Tesla reported $22.4 billion in revenue and $0.41 in non-GAAP earnings. A "double beat." The stock popped 4% after hours. Victory, right?
WRONG
Dig into the actual filing:
The number one driver of operating income improvement wasn't cost reductions, wasn't volume growth, wasn't FSD revenue. It was - and Tesla listed this FIRST in their own shareholder letter - "one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs."
They released warranty reserves. They booked tariff refund windfalls. They stretched supplier payments by 10 days. They took on billions in new debt. Then they presented everything through non-GAAP metrics that strip out over $1 billion in stock-based compensation.
GAAP net income was $477 million on $22.4 billion in revenue. That's a 2.1% net margin. On a $1.4 trillion market cap.
Let me put that in perspective:
3.75 billion shares outstanding. Annualize the Q1 GAAP profit and you get roughly $1.9 billion. That's a trailing P/E ratio north of 700. Use the adjusted number - strip out stock comp, which is a REAL cost to shareholders through dilution - and you're still at around 250x earnings.
All of this is extremely bad, but I didn't even talk about the CAPEX BOMB yet...
3 months ago, Tesla guided to "over $20 billion" in 2026 capital expenditure. Last night they raised it to over $25 billion. A $5 billion increase in a single quarter. That's 3x their historical annual capex run rate - $8.5 billion in 2025, $11.3 billion in 2024. The CFO confirmed on the call that Tesla expects NEGATIVE free cash flow for the rest of the year.
So you have a company generating roughly $6 billion in annual free cash flow on a good year, and they're about to spend $25 billion.
The math doesn't work.
They will almost certainly need to issue equity. Which means dilution. Which means the $1.9 billion in annual earnings gets spread across even MORE shares.
The core auto business is literally deteriorating in real time:
Tesla delivered 358,000 vehicles in Q1 (missed estimates again).
They produced 408,000. That's 50,000 cars sitting on lots that nobody bought.
Inventory days jumped from 10 to 27 in just a few quarters. California (their most important US market) saw registrations crash 24% year over year.
Their market share in the state fell from 9.2% to 7.7%. That's on top of a Q1 2025 that was ALREADY weak from Model Y retooling. They're declining off a decline.
And here's what really kills the bull case...
The entire valuation rests on robotaxis, Optimus robots, and autonomy. So let's put numbers on it:
Waymo - the actual leader in autonomous driving with 15 million completed rides in 2025 alone, over 127 million autonomous miles driven, operating commercially across 6 US cities with plans to expand to 20 more - just raised $16 billion at a $126 billion valuation.
That's the market's verdict on what the LEADING robotaxi company is worth. $126 billion.
And Waymo is YEARS ahead of Tesla in actual deployment.
Tesla has 3.75 billion shares outstanding. So even if you assign $126 billion in robotaxi value (giving Tesla full credit for matching Waymo despite being nowhere close) that's $33 a share. Add the auto business at generous auto-industry multiples, maybe $20 a share. Throw in energy storage and services, $10-15.
Sum of the parts gets you to roughly $65-70 a share if you're feeling generous. Maybe $50 if you're not.
The stock is $387.
So what exactly are you paying for?
You're paying for a STORY. You're paying for PROMISES that keep getting pushed back, technology that keeps falling short, and a business plan that requires spending $25 billion a year while the core product sells fewer units at declining margins in a market where California sales just fell 24% and the federal EV tax credit is gone.
I managed the number one mutual fund in America. I founded two billion-dollar hedge funds. I've been doing this since 1981.
And I am telling you:
Tesla at $387 is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career.
THE CRASH WILL BE EPIC
English








