natalie scibetta

Hey, just thought X might appreciate a reminder of the following: It wasn't so long ago that we all wrote our own posts and responses and scripts---- and we were doing JUST FINE. It's really obvious to some of us when someone has delegated their content writing to Chatgpt. It's going to start being obvious to more people the longer this goes on. Stop doing it. It's scary and dangerous. You don't need Chatgpt to be brilliant--- you were already perfect. Who convinced you that a line of code could do your job better? Whoever it was, they were wrong. End lecture. For now.

@Kaduffnu @RealCandaceO Fuck off

@RealCandaceO Urgent Whisper? Are you trying to be a cute black mom today

My 2 year old is a sweet little chunk. Every Sunday, try as we may to explain the concept of communion, he bursts into tears at the altar, certain he is being intentionally targeted for exclusion by the Priest. Husband, in urgent whisper: “Max, it’s NOT a snack” (for the zillionth time) Max, in tears: “…but Daddy, I want to eat” The drama continues.

@truthstreamnews I have to reserve a portion of every day exclusively for the purpose of shoving the panic back down into it's box and screaming into a pillow.

So will used cars end up costing more than new cars because people will be trying to get the last vehicles that can’t be shut down remotely via software?

@HammSandwich33 @RealCandaceO You guys are so annoying. StFu.

@RealCandaceO Wait, so you “manually retyped” a supposed email and are now showing it as though it’s proof? Even for conspiracy theories, this one is on the fringe of the craziest. You’re a fucking lunatic to think that anyone would knowingly believe this shit.

🚨BREAKING: As we reported on our show yesterday, approximately 1 Hour following the WHCD shooting, the White House Military Office sent an e-mail directing the amplification of Erika Kirk’s “I want to go home” video clip. Unfortunately, the e-mail was sent to the wrong internal groups. They then attempted to have I.T revoke the e-mail. When that failed they ordered every person to destroy the e-mail. I have manually retyped the relevant portion of the e-mail that they wanted destroyed. (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks) So the question now is— why did the military so quickly prioritize making Erika Kirk the face of WHCD shooting? Is that normal emergency protocol or was this unnaturally preplanned?

@TheMilkBarTV Fucking rude. STFU.

Candace Owens BUTCHERING WORDS SUPERCUT. 29 words massacred.

This is scary level psyop. It's so clear what is happening here---- give the message that speaking out is dangerous, it's dangerous because of the left) antifa/blah blah blah whatever, reinforces the idea that the left are the source of this new danger to continue the propaganda blitz that is slowly doing it's best to chip away at unapproved narratives and I think the constant messaging also serves to exhaust the Cassandras in society who are constantly connecting dots and being told to chill out by their circle. .. It's working.

‼️Turning Point & Chloe Cole CAUGHT In A Blatant LIE About University Of Washington Event CANCELLATION!👀 Chloe Cole posted a dramatic video yesterday claiming the University of Washington event was canceled because “Antifa assembled a local militia” and she was under attack by the “woke left.” That’s not true. The real reason the event was canceled? Optics. Just two days earlier, a 19-year-old transgender woman was stabbed to death in the laundry room at Nordheim Court (right on/near UW campus). The suspect is still at large, the campus is on edge, and students are scared. University of Washington spokesperson Victor Balto confirmed it straight up: “My understanding is that the national TPUSA organization has decided to cancel this event.” Turning Point didn’t want the terrible visual of hosting a prominent “former transgender” speaker right after a trans student was murdered on campus with the killer still loose. So instead of owning the real reason, they (and Chloe) spun it as Antifa/woke mob threats to play the victim card. That’s not just dishonest — it’s straight-up gaslighting. Meanwhile, they can’t even fill rooms for Erika Kirk and JD Vance events… but sure, let’s blame Antifa. The public deserves the truth, not manufactured narratives. Watch the full breakdown and tell me: how many more lies are we going to let slide? 👇 ⚠️ATTN: My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 spot.fund/3b3k3sc 💪

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO WTF are you talking about? Do you even watch her show? She 100% tried to get in touch with Harpole like 5 times. He ignored her every time. So dumb.

Undeniable proof that @RealCandaceO lied. She didn’t just get it wrong — she knowingly lied to her audience, treating them like idiots. This is also clear evidence of reckless disregard for the truth and actual malice in her defamation of Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk. I break down exactly why she’s going to lose the Harpole defamation case. Watch below 👇 *Uploaded the directly to X bc I know some don't like switching platforms to view videos. This one's important for people to see. Please share! @dhillonlaw

@somewheresy Not even remotely funny. Like WTF even is this you are retarded. SMH.

I’m extremely happy that Alex Jones is pissed off and losing his empire but at the same time this creatively sucks and is terrible

@MAGACult2 You are a fucking idiot

My favorite MTG story is when she said she called President Trump and asked him to tone down the rhetoric because her kids were receiving death threats and he blamed her and she thought that was terrible. Like b, you thought you were special? 😂😂🤣🤣

@JavelinNorth @SwordTruth @MAGACult2 The dude is definitely AI

@SwordTruth @MAGACult2 Ai Slop. Even the dude in the video is AI 🤡

Why Did Erika Kirk Flip on Charlie Kirk’s Longstanding Position of Not Attending the Correspondents’ Dinner? "Hey guys, Sword Truth here. Why did Erika Kirk flip on Charlie Kirk’s longstanding position of not attending the Correspondents’ Dinner? Charlie openly mocked the event and refused to go for years. Trump had not attended since 2011. Yet Erika showed up anyway and was right there in the room when the chaos erupted. The post from @BasedSamParker puts it perfectly. It is just another example of Erika reversing Charlie’s positions, and it happened at the same event Trump had stayed away from for over a decade. An interesting night of firsts, don’t you think? This is not a small detail. Charlie built the movement by rejecting the DC media circus and staying focused on the real fight. Erika shows up at the very event he criticized, ends up in the middle of gunfire, gets escorted out crying, and the whole thing becomes another high-profile optics moment for TPUSA. The contrast is glaring. The comments under the post are brutal. People are pointing out the irony that the same crowd cheering tax dollars for a bigger ballroom is the one that hates the media but still shows up for the party. Others are calling out the suspicious timing and the complete lack of angry protesters at an event everyone knew Trump would attend. One comment summed it up perfectly — the scripts seem eerily similar to previous incidents. The reversal raises serious questions about the direction. When the organization starts reversing the founder’s clear positions on things like the Correspondents’ Dinner, it shows how far the current leadership has drifted from what Charlie actually built. Erika keeps getting rolled out for these elite stages while the grassroots side struggles with turnout and chapter issues. The pattern of high-profile appearances that end in drama or questions keeps repeating. Charlie never needed the Correspondents’ Dinner or the DC circus. The current leadership does, and the results speak for themselves.

@SwordTruth Is this guy AI???

Following this line of thinking---- I personally don't think ANY mass or school shooting that has happened in this country, nor any act of domestic terrorism (McVey, Boston, Las Vegas, the bar in FL, the theater in Colorado, Parkland /Nicholas Cruz, Sandy Hook etc) were real. Either they were entirely staged, entirely provoked and controlled, or simply not what we were told occurred or why or by whom (Thinking of Las Vegas when I say this last one). I KIND of think that something really happened in Uvalde, however, because that story in my opinion is even more horrific than Sandy Hook and yet that story was in and out of the news within 2-3 weeks while Alex Jones was being sued for billions over Sandy Hook (2012) in 2023 just for comparison. We never heard a peep about that story once it was out of the news. I think it was real because I think that that is probably how law enforcement might actually behave if an actual non hoax school shooting happened involving automatic weapons. If you remember, the cops just stood around outside while 2nd graders were being machine gunned a few feet away inside a classroom and parents ended up running into the school long before the cops did because THAT'S how PARENTS would actually respond to hearing that someone was shooting at their kids at their school vs the absolute psychopaths they cast as the Sandy Hook parents who behaved very similarly to Erika Kirk in multiple interviews after the fact. My point is that I think that every act of shocking, allegedly premeditated violence in the news in the last 20 years has been manufactured with the express motivation of chipping away at gun rights. These people are not dumb and they aren't impatient. They know there's no chance of pulling a gun buyback in the US and so the only way to disarm its population is by ever so slowly banning groups of people from purchasing guns (felons, marijuana smokers, domestic violence offender s even if never convicted----if you are even booked for DV you can kiss your gun rights goodbye for life as far as I know. Red flag laws that make it so all that has to happen for you to have your guns and gun rights revoked is for someone----anyone----- to officially report you as being mentally unstable. Goodbye guns, goodbye right to use guns or own guns. The penalty for being caught with a gun when you are a felon can be up to ten years. The penalty for being caught with ONE BULLET when you are a felon is up to 5 years. You do not need to have also committed a crime. They've spent more than 20 years making sure that the biggest typical non compliers who also tend to stick together, distrust outsiders and approach anything coming from the government with suspicion make up the biggest group of people with no gun rights so that they either never own guns or they do and get caught and locked up for decades ---- either way, they've taken extra care to greatly handicap a significant threat to future planned dystopias. Whoever is left over that might someday decide to acquire guns and hasn't lost their right to do so was likely vaccinated and therefore sterilized while simultaneously encouraged to self neuter, self emasculate, self destruct. The only thing standing in between us and hostile takeover is guns. If they could have gotten away with just incinerating all of us, they would have done that a long time ago. Don't you think it's weird that the biggest cheerleaders for banning guns here are part of a culture that hands every 18 year old guns and makes it mandatory they learn how to use them in their own country? Honest opinion is it was too late for us a long time ago. Anything we do from here on out can only hope to slow what's coming down best case scenario.

Why is Trump lying to the American people about building a ballroom, when it’s really a military grade bunker? This isn’t for dinners at the White House, this is for what’s coming…

@YoungGun8140 WTF!!! CAN YOU PLEASE NOT CUT CLIPS LIKE THIS? Cut before he starts talking about time travel or after he is done talking about time travel. Why do it this way? WTF is really going on?!?

Creepy messages emerge from UFO scientist found dead, this is getting weird.

@charise_lee Same people trying to assassinate Trump as attempted to assassinate Hitler, probably lol.

@letsdiscusssomething breaks down #KarolineLeavitts babbling #Sycophant

@WithoutHistory They didn't turn off his mic, what is the point of saying that? You must just assume that no one will watch the entire clip. SMH.

French historian tells the truth. So they cut off his mic.

Another thing is that statement from the alleged coroner about how if not stopped by Charlie's super neck it would have killed the people standing behind the banner. Since we know that that was BS, (the super neck) then how do we explain the fact that the people standing directly behind him behind the banner were not harmed? Even if it wasn't a 30. 6 (it obviously wasn't) if it was any kind of actual bullet wouldn't someone else have been hit or almost hit? I think this is part of the reason for grabbing the ad cards from the cameras

@BlakeBednarz Can you explain why the kid in the video wasn't hurt or was he injured from this experiment?

To my squibber friends, the bar is much, much higher! Let me help y’all out - Erika swapped out CK’s necklace without him knowing with a weaponized NitroCarbon shaped charge and he was really killed - By his own people! I applaud your tenaciousness by this wasn’t even close.

Hey you're right!!! That actually makes a million times more sense as to why she might have been seen there---- that would be a reason to have been there that day. Wouldn't have been wise to have had it in her possession to early as it could have been found. I also kind of think that the plan to take him out was not planned very far in advance. I think it was planned because of what he said in that text to everyone the day before.

@BlakeBednarz She woulhd have had to have picked up that exploding necklace from somewhere.... perhaps somewhere where it may have been tested... like fort Huachaca! But no one can put her at that fort prior to the killing, right? Whoops!

@OneGoodShibe @BlakeBednarz That's real footage and that's one of the security people grabbing his arm as he fell it's just zoomed in.

@BlakeBednarz WTF are you guys using an AI recreation of Charlie's death for? There was nowhere near that much blood. Some tatted guy is holding Charlie's arm as he falls? Giant BS here.

I have, up to this point, been extremely skeptical of all of this kind of theories, however this just made me think of something. As many have brought up, this necklace was mentioned by multiple people and I think held out a window by Erika at some point. I also remember her mentioning that he "grabbed his wedding ring and necklace and left" the morning of the tenth. Everyone got stuck on the wedding ring---"why wasn't he wearing his ring?" Etc but I'm pretty sure she said he grabbed the necklace also, which suggests that his nightly ritual included removing his jewelry and putting it in the same place to put back on in the morning. If he was the type of person who does this sort of thing, it wouldn't have been hard at all to switch his necklace out with a different one or more likely, just switch PART of his necklace out. I remember her saying that there were multiple "charms" on that necklace. He would have noticed a difference in weight and sound if the whole thing was replaced but not necessarily if it was only one part switched out. It was a St Christopher medallion, right? In my experience with human behavior when there is a secret of some kind, those who know of the secret, however dumb it is to do this, tend to overcompensate for the lie by giving too many details and if that necklace was in front brain of a group of liars, they might have thought it prudent to mention it thinking to not mention it would somehow be suspicious even though that's nonsensical. That's how people hiding something think. It can be hard to see the situation as an outsider who has no clue what happened and so instead of just acting normal, they mention things no one would have otherwise given a sercond thought to, they give too many details which people telling the truth tend not to do, they feel like they need to explain things like the whereabouts of objects that no one was looking for or thinking about... This is very common and that's exactly what these people all did in interviews. Necklace was brought up by Harpole, Erika, Frank....idk who else but I know for sure that those three mentioned it. And for no good reason because the necklace played no part whatsoever in the official narrative. It being a much loved item to Charlie isn't enough of a reason to bring it up multiple times and wave it around out a car window like anyone would have a clue why she was doing that that wasn't someone in the family or close circle. Charlie had many followers but they weren't necessarily FANS because he wasn't just some celebrity. What Charlie SAID was important, not what he wore or did or how attractive he was and therefore he is unlikely to have had die hard fans who knew everything about him including the story about the necklace and would have been looking for it or asking for it. I still think this theory is a long shot but I also think I just made a damn good case for how it might have been pulled off and how people involved acted during and after and why (they are lying and guilty of SOMETHING, not necessarily murder but of SOMETHING.)

@Maximus163 @royermattw @ChrisDJackson Good point.

It seems security worked just fine so it’s more of a point why a new ballroom isn’t needed. That’s why the whole thing defies logic. Trump nor any member of his administration were ever in any danger at all. Now if the shooter had gotten through & shot up the correspondent’s dinner, then they’d have an argument. Unfortunately for them, this showed that current security measures are more than enough. 🤷

Ashley St. Clair confirmed the WH runs group chats telling these accounts what to post. Within minutes of shots fired tonight, before there was any news of casualties and before the President said this exact talking point, this was the chat in real time.

@joanfromboston @royermattw Well put.

Again....this was a planned, fake attempt and the goal aside from stopping the Epstein Awards at this dinner.....was to PUSH FOR THE "BAALROOM". This is not just about a bunker or data center - I don't think most people object to any POTUS having one -which would be UNDERGROUND ....this actually IS about the "Baalroom" on top. NONE of these people are Christians and I don't think any of them are actual Jews either....They're something ELSE that hides like the cuckoo inside other nests.