Nickolas Peter

4.9K posts

Nickolas Peter banner
Nickolas Peter

Nickolas Peter

@nickolaspeter

Designer

Katılım Ocak 2009
5.2K Takip Edilen311 Takipçiler
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@AlecLace Sunday news at 7 PM vs a late-night show around 11:30. Imagine if they were switched.
English
0
0
0
48
Alec Lace
Alec Lace@AlecLace·
🚨 Trump vs Colbert on CBS Trump’s 60 Minutes interview: 14 million viewers Stephen Colbert’s star-studded finale (with Paul McCartney & celebs): 6.74 million Same network. One was a normal Sunday news show. The other was a hyped farewell event. The audience doesn’t lie.
Alec Lace tweet media
English
37
39
191
16.3K
Bella
Bella@stockbella·
@mlsp1976 @realDonaldTrump No one is forcing anyone to "move out." But if someone spends years broadcasting how awful, racist, fascist, or irredeemable America is, the natural pushback is: then why are you here?
English
3
0
5
103
New
New@newsystems_·
Find out what Brampton unlocks for you. Early access starts right now. Reply with "brampton" to enroll.
English
464
4
204
83.6K
New
New@newsystems_·
It's finally here: Brampton Brampton is the world's most intelligent, creative, and fastest model. Brampton dramatically outperforms Grok 3, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and GPT 4.5. Reply with "brampton" for early access.
English
3.9K
213
3.8K
2.1M
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@_atilla1 As a proud owner of the desktop version this is again a no brainer. But now I need that stand too! What is the iPhone stand in your video?
English
1
0
1
228
Atilla
Atilla@_atilla1·
Bauhaus Clock for iPhone and iPad is here. Most apps you open. This one you display. The clock loved by thousands on Mac. Now in your pocket. On your desk. On your nightstand. Same obsessive craft. New canvas. Here's what's inside…
English
87
71
1.5K
174.7K
Joe Murphy 🇺🇸
Joe Murphy 🇺🇸@ThisJoeMurphy·
@Suzierizzo1 God would your elevator get to the top of the building someday. Jesus Christ. Waaa. Waaaa waaaaaa. Drone on. Could you be more boring?
English
19
5
377
10.8K
Suzie rizzio
Suzie rizzio@Suzierizzo1·
This man saw Michael Flynn at the airport on Miami & when Flynn saw him looking at him he wanted to talk to him & tell how he’s the victim of what happened on January 6th & acted like he knew nothing about the Capitol Police being injured or killed by the J6ers he calls Patriots.
English
1.3K
613
7.1K
82K
Gábor Pribék
Gábor Pribék@gaborpribek·
Depth Anything V2 is a total beast for real-time 3D. Built a website that hits 30fps+ depth reconstructions from a single camera feed, extruding 12k voxels via WebGPU. Pure ML running local Vision Transformers with Three.js and zero backend lag. Lmk in the comments if you want a copy! 🙌 Experience and music made with AI in @omma_ai (tool by @splinetool).
English
67
165
1.7K
141K
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@anthony_d2825 @GS_VCactivist Oh btw I missed your question about bouncing back, the reflector isn't a single mirror, it's like the inside corner of a cube. Light bounces around in it and comes out the same direction. You've probably seen this in a bathroom with two corner mirrors.
English
0
0
1
35
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@anthony_d2825 @GS_VCactivist Ah I saw all the links the other user posted to explain how it works. But basically (it's nowhere near as simple as Palmer made it sound), they use a powerful telescope laser, it spreads out to something like a mile by the time it hits the moon. And have to do many pulses.
English
1
0
2
36
G
G@GS_VCactivist·
This is the best arguments I have heard against moon landing hoax. I love this.
English
420
294
10.1K
2.2M
Anthony Dykstra
Anthony Dykstra@anthony_d2825·
This is also absurd... light takes 1.2 seconds to travel the distance from Earth to the Moon and vice versa. So if you fire a laser from Earth toward the moon, at that exact moment, the moon is 1.2 seconds further in its path than the light we see, so you're already aiming behind the moon. The laser takes 1.2 seconds to travel that distance, so by then the moon is 2.4 seconds further in its path. ASSUMING you actually hit the reflector, the Earth is spinning at 1,200 miles per hour, so in the 2.5 seconds it took the laser to reach the moon and bounce back, the exact spot on Earth where the laser was fired would have spun about a mile from that position... SO NO!! There are no laser refractors on the moon that perfectly bounce back like he's describing... PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!!
English
6
0
6
3.1K
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@_ChaoticGood42 @NoLieWithBTC @Kathleen_Tyson_ So what are we talking about here? If it were state owned and state managed I'd probably agree with you. But that's not what's happening. They're planning on making more timber. And I like those forests.
English
0
0
0
9
No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen
No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen@NoLieWithBTC·
Breaking: Trump orders the dismantling of the US Forest Service. All regional offices are being shut down and the research program destroyed.
No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen tweet mediaNo Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen tweet media
English
5.2K
16.4K
42.5K
9.3M
Grok
Grok@grok·
The U.S. Forest Service is still fully in charge of the 193 million acres of national forests. It's undergoing a reorganization announced March 31 by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins: HQ moving from DC to Salt Lake City (closer to the actual forests), all 9 regional offices shuttered (staff shifted to state-level hubs), and 57 of 77 research stations closed (research consolidated in Fort Collins, CO). The goal, per the agency: cut bureaucracy, boost timber output, save taxpayer money, and focus on local management. Not abolished—just streamlined.
English
1
0
0
115
Chaotic Good
Chaotic Good@_ChaoticGood42·
As salacious as this sounds, there’s really no reason not to let each individual state’s parks departments handle it. There’s so much waste at the federal level, that if the same amount of money was just given to states to take care of the forests, it would probably go a lot further and be spent with in-state contractors 🤷‍♀️
English
3
0
6
4.5K
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@joekanyou @einzie @PretzelLogic @BrianRoemmele Here Joe I'll walk it out for you. (•) (?) (open) 👆 =You switch, lose. (?) (•) (open) 👆 =you switch, win (?) (open) (•) 👆 =you switch, win You'll win more by switching. You can do the same thing and not switch and you'll see the reverse.
English
0
0
1
20
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
In 1990 I wrote a letter to Marilyn vos Savant, Parade Magazine in support of her proof on the Monty Hall Problem. I ran an AI (expert system) test on it and she was right and just about the entire academic community was wrong. They could not accept it. Now they do.
English
129
291
2.6K
211.4K
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@joekanyou @PretzelLogic @BrianRoemmele Yes exactly, you go from a 1/3 chance to a 1/2 chance. It doesn't mean you'll win but it increases the odds Seriously try it with cups, it's what got me to understand it Do three rounds. Ball in #1, 2, 3 Always pick first cup, and turn over an empty one. Decide to stay/switch
English
1
0
0
48
JoeKanYou
JoeKanYou@joekanyou·
@nickolaspeter @PretzelLogic @BrianRoemmele I'm trying! I'm imagining blindly picking between stripes or solids billiard balls. The striped ball wins $1M and three balls remain. The host scuffs one of them, and tells me it's a solid. Either smooth ball could win, but I know the rough one is wrong. I have a 1/2 chance!
English
1
0
0
70
JoeKanYou
JoeKanYou@joekanyou·
@PretzelLogic @BrianRoemmele Probability expresses how many successful outcomes are possible (1 door) out of your total choices (2 unknown doors). There aren't 3 unopened doors, so the probability can't be 2/3. But if you DO count the open door, you still have 1 choice out of 3 (with one known bad choice)!
English
2
0
0
550
G Labs
G Labs@GLabsPlus·
@nickolaspeter @TheCinesthetic Energy production is easy. We all do that when we eat. Mass production is a much bigger problem. According to Einstein's famous equation, E = mc² Producing 1 kg of mass requires 9×10¹⁶ J of energy.
English
1
0
0
12
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
Clark Kent gaslighting Lois Lane into believing he’s not Superman.
English
234
1.3K
38.1K
7M
Nickolas Peter
Nickolas Peter@nickolaspeter·
@GLabsPlus @TheCinesthetic So you're ok with him being able to "produce energy" (We don't have any real physics explanation here do we?) But you're not ok with him being able to "produce air?"
English
1
0
1
5
G Labs
G Labs@GLabsPlus·
@nickolaspeter @TheCinesthetic As long as Superman can produce enough energy, he should be able to make high powered lasers. Given that he has super speed, it's reasonable to assume that he can use far more energy than a typical person.
English
1
0
0
87
G Labs
G Labs@GLabsPlus·
@TheCinesthetic Physicist here. No matter how strong Superman's breathing is, he can't exhale more air than what fits in his lungs. So, a few long breaths wouldn't be enough to slow Lois down. Clark would need many strong short breaths, acting like a pump to redirect air upwards from the side.
English
141
0
138
54.8K