will

🚨🚨NAKED SHORT SELLERS ARE CRIMINALS BUT SEC PROTECTS THEM 🙉🙊🙈 SEC doesn't want to create Short Squeezes. But they don't want to stop the ability for Short Sellers to Naked Short companies entire floats. Truth is if the SEC actually did their job there wouldn't be a risk of a short squeezes. Illegal Naked Short Selling creates counterfeit shares that can't be delivered because they don't exist. TRADE SETTLEMENT SHOULD BE MANDATORY‼️

The collapse of $GDC GD Culture Group - Naked Shorts or Pump and Dump? If $GDC could verify their 7500 BTC with a wallet address that would go a long way to answering doubts. Instead we get promoters publishing a chart listing the company in number 7 position, based on the company's SEC disclosure. This is inadequate proof. Since speculating in GDC is almost entirely a bet on their bitcoin ownership, to allay doubts investors should demand the BTC be independently verified on-chain. Believing GDC owns 7500 BTC requires you to take the Chinese company's word as fact. They should provide a wallet address. The BTC has not been audited, and oddly they bought it at a steep discount in a share exchange asset acquisition from Pallas. One would be right to wonder why and how that discounted structure came about. BTC then worth $876M was acquired for $274M worth of $GDC shares - strikes me as very strange. Companies sometimes tell big lies (see $GTII and $MMTLP). $GDC collapsing was either 1) a loss of confidence sell off 2) short driven or 3) dilution driven. History with similar tickers shows dilution often drives the 'dump' far more than shorts. GDC increasing authorized shares from 200M to 10B, followed by a $300M ATM filing, their lack of operational income, cash burn, and stock collapse fit that pattern of a dilution driven sell off. However, whether it's lost confidence, dilution, or something worse I can't say just yet. More transparency from the company (or the next filings) will tell. Look for official word from GTC. Will they provide on-chain evidence of custody of 7500 BTC? Will they provide news that the offer of $10.75/sh flips from non-binding to binding? Or will they stay silent til we find out the next issued share count? The primary accounts pushing these tickers often use naked shorts as a talking point while never reporting on the actual dilution. Carefully read all company filings, not just social media talking points, and realize some people profit from keeping you uninformed and emotional. They don't want you asking legitimate questions. Real investors ask questions. Real communities have due diligence discussion. Be careful with those that try to stifle or shut down discussion with insults and personal attacks over filings. Watch the comments below to see who is in which category.

The collapse of $GDC GD Culture Group - Naked Shorts or Pump and Dump? If $GDC could verify their 7500 BTC with a wallet address that would go a long way to answering doubts. Instead we get promoters publishing a chart listing the company in number 7 position, based on the company's SEC disclosure. This is inadequate proof. Since speculating in GDC is almost entirely a bet on their bitcoin ownership, to allay doubts investors should demand the BTC be independently verified on-chain. Believing GDC owns 7500 BTC requires you to take the Chinese company's word as fact. They should provide a wallet address. The BTC has not been audited, and oddly they bought it at a steep discount in a share exchange asset acquisition from Pallas. One would be right to wonder why and how that discounted structure came about. BTC then worth $876M was acquired for $274M worth of $GDC shares - strikes me as very strange. Companies sometimes tell big lies (see $GTII and $MMTLP). $GDC collapsing was either 1) a loss of confidence sell off 2) short driven or 3) dilution driven. History with similar tickers shows dilution often drives the 'dump' far more than shorts. GDC increasing authorized shares from 200M to 10B, followed by a $300M ATM filing, their lack of operational income, cash burn, and stock collapse fit that pattern of a dilution driven sell off. However, whether it's lost confidence, dilution, or something worse I can't say just yet. More transparency from the company (or the next filings) will tell. Look for official word from GTC. Will they provide on-chain evidence of custody of 7500 BTC? Will they provide news that the offer of $10.75/sh flips from non-binding to binding? Or will they stay silent til we find out the next issued share count? The primary accounts pushing these tickers often use naked shorts as a talking point while never reporting on the actual dilution. Carefully read all company filings, not just social media talking points, and realize some people profit from keeping you uninformed and emotional. They don't want you asking legitimate questions. Real investors ask questions. Real communities have due diligence discussion. Be careful with those that try to stifle or shut down discussion with insults and personal attacks over filings. Watch the comments below to see who is in which category.