Paul Modderman

1.2K posts

Paul Modderman

Paul Modderman

@PaulModderman

Principal Nerd @boringnerds, founding engineer @nova_ai, author. @paulmodderman.bsky.social

Minnetonka, MN Katılım Kasım 2014
1.1K Takip Edilen645 Takipçiler
Boris Cherny
Boris Cherny@bcherny·
See everyone tomorrow!!
Boris Cherny tweet media
English
148
54
3.7K
230.6K
Paul Modderman retweetledi
FORTUNE
FORTUNE@FortuneMagazine·
Nova Intelligence has raised a $31.5 million Series A led by Chemistry, Fortune exclusively learned, bringing total funding to more than $40 million. bit.ly/4tbPMx1
English
4
6
13
2.2K
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
@emollick There's something joyful in a technology forcing me to update my understanding of what "creativity" is, because I also have a hard time arguing this isn't real creativity
English
0
0
5
528
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
Opus 4.5: "you need to build a game that is coherent, fun and story driven. There are precisely two controls. One is slider, in which one side is labelled Maximum Potato and the other is labelled Formalware, there are four positions for the slider. The other is a dial that goes from Monet to Drive-Thru. These labels are literal, not figurative. Figure it out. Don't ask any questions." Then I wrote "make it even better." I didn't make a single design decision (and Claude "hand drew" all the art). I dunno, hard to argue this is not real creativity. Play it here (there are five scenes): elaborate-toffee-be16e4.netlify.app
English
18
26
413
40.1K
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
@jonerp I would like to see/hear/read this stump speech. got a link handy?
Paul Modderman tweet media
English
1
0
0
31
Paul Modderman retweetledi
Boring Enterprise Nerds
Boring Enterprise Nerds@BoringNerds·
Confused by the latest SAP "clean core" hubbub? Let's break it down and crack it wide open! How did 3 tiers become 4 levels and what does it mean for you? Only one way to find out: watch it! #SAP #ABAP youtu.be/wKl_qFmR9l0
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
3
6
434
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
@jeffzwang If this is true I’m either not doing sex right or doing vim right
English
1
0
3
161
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
@dmitriid I’d love to hear more about the setup/languages/prompts/etc in your scenario. I think people should aggressively share these counter examples.
English
1
0
2
151
Dmitrii
Dmitrii@dmitriid·
I keep saying: I have no idea what code these people are working on. Yesterday I spent $20+ and almost two hours trying to get the simplest functionality working in Claude Code. It had all context, original working code, docs, and its own analysis to work from
Steve Yegge@Steve_Yegge

Another late-night Claude Code post. First, if you've just arrived here at the party, Claude Code is NOT the same thing as Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude.ai, nor any other Claudey thing. It is its own new experimental thing, also from Anthropic, makers of Claude and Other Claudey Things. Claude Code (CC) is a new coding assistant, one which, strangely enough, only runs in a terminal. Like an xterm, or a bash shell. Or any of six WSL shells that don't quite work. As a result, CC looks comically retro-futuristic: A late-1980s vision of what AI might become. And here we are. CC is what we all thought Devin was going to be last year. When Devin came out in December, people Muntz-laughed and moved on. But CC is a bona-fide AI software engineer. It deserves the title. And the funny thing is, they appear to have eschewed RAG completely, and just told Claude to go figure stuff out on its own. I am here to say that I am addicted to Claude Code. I can't put it down. I don't mean that figuratively. I mean I literally do not know how to put my computer down and go to sleep. Because Claude Code keeps doing stuff. It keeps solving massive problems, one after another. I throw larger and larger things at it, and it is unfazed. Chomp. Chomp. Chomp. It's like that old Assassin's Creed game, Rome maybe, when you had that big network of spies working for you towards the end of the game, and you just sent them out on missions while you sat on your fat ass, and it was absolutely just as much fun as "running" around the game world? Well I remember. This, is that. You know what? We can't be more than 2-3 months away from being able to say, "Yo, CC, just... go make tests. For everything. All the stuff I failed to test over the past 2 decades, go redeem me. Write tests for it all, and make sure they are clever and meaningful, and follow our testing patterns." And then you deposit like, I dunno, $5000 into its gaping maw. It just goes off for a week or two, doing its thang on a branch somewhere, mostly I/O bound waiting on your builds. And one day you get the email you've been waiting for. It says: "Send Money". After a few more weeks of this, it finally takes you from 10% to 90% test coverage, so that when you die you will be admitted into Good Engineer Heaven. All other coding assistants will follow CC's approach, in some form factor. They are all falling over themselves right now, as we speak. Because yes, to answer all your exact same FAQs: Claude Code is that much better. The race is on!

English
1
0
9
3K
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
(Because I am in the same camp that she is on this discussion)
English
0
0
0
50
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
I’ve enjoyed this whole discussion. I especially appreciate @AmandaAskell ‘s formulation in the first sentence of this tweet. I’m often not sure how to respond to those who make the same inferential leap, and this formulation helps my communication. Thank you, Amanda.
Amanda Askell@AmandaAskell

I claimed the inference from X="LLMs are next token predictors" to Y="LLMs lack understanding, etc." is fallacious. Marcus claims that I'm saying not-X and not-Y. So I guess I'll point out that the inference "Y doesn't follow from X" to "not-X and not-Y" is also fallacious.

English
1
0
1
121
Paul Modderman
Paul Modderman@PaulModderman·
I don’t know what numbers I’d have guessed, but software dev being a top use is exactly what I’d have guessed prior to seeing the data. AI/LLMs might not be perfect software engineers yet, but they sure as hell know about code
Philipp Schmid@_philschmid

Interesting! Based on “The @AnthropicAI Economic Index” (millions of Claude conversations) AI usage is currently concentrated in software development and technical writing. TL;DR: 💻 Computer & Mathematical jobs dominate AI usage (37.2% of queries) despite being only 3.4% of workforce 📝 Writing/editing tasks are second most common (10.3% of queries) 🤝 AI augments human work (57%) more than automates it (43%) 💼 36% of jobs use AI for at least 25% of tasks, only 4% use it for 75%+ of tasks 💰 Mid-to-high wage jobs show highest AI adoption, both lowest and highest wage jobs show minimal usage 🔄 Tasks are being enhanced rather than jobs being fully automated 📊 Analysis based on real usage data from millions of Claude ai conversations 🎯 Usage concentrated in specific tasks rather than entire occupations

English
0
0
0
93