Rachit Gupta

14.4K posts

Rachit Gupta banner
Rachit Gupta

Rachit Gupta

@rag_upta

Technology and AI enthusiast

Mumbai, India Katılım Haziran 2009
83 Takip Edilen196 Takipçiler
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
@regent0x_ Bro is just dropping the absolute “basic” stuff enterprise and high agency developers are already using from so long and still gets hyped 😅
English
0
0
1
1.1K
regent0x
regent0x@regent0x_·
karpathy said it best - most people paying for claude aren't actually using claude. they're typing prompts into a $20/mo chatbox meanwhile claude code ships with built-in features that replace 90% of plugins people install and nobody knows they exist i had 23 plugins. deleted all of them. my sessions got 3x longer and my outputs got sharper watch the video then read the full breakdown below - you'll probably uninstall half your setup by tonight
regent0x@regent0x_

x.com/i/article/2057…

English
41
161
2.5K
705.1K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
@shukla_tarun @IndiGo6E @DGCAIndia @RamMNK @PMOIndia Child safety is, ultimately, the parent’s responsibility. Paying a few hundred for choice seat beforehand assuring safety, makes more sense than fighting legal battles with airline after incident has occurred.
English
1
0
2
1.1K
Tarun Shukla
Tarun Shukla@shukla_tarun·
State of affairs: - @IndiGo6E forces 3 year old kid to sit away from parents because they didn't pay for seat selection - This is despite paying Rs 44000 for Bagdogra to Kolkata tickets - Which is also a turbulent sector as parent notes & in violation of @DGCAIndia rules ✈️
Tarun Shukla tweet media
English
82
220
816
91.6K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
@morganlinton How is cursor affordable? It burns faster than claude for my team. Are you using any specific models only?
English
0
0
0
29
Morgan
Morgan@morganlinton·
Officially canceling our Anthropic plan, it’s Codex + Cursor for my little 16 person eng team. Anthropic is great for companies that can spend $2,000/mo and up per engineer, but not affordable for us. Codex really upped their game recently, and with GPT 5.5, it’s just so good, and so token efficient. Still using Cursor plenty, my team still looks and reviews a lot of code. But with Cursor, we’ve never hit a limit, and Composer 2 is pretty awesome for most stuff. Testing out Droid as well and see some good early results with Droid + GLM 5.1, but still more testing to do before rolling it out to the whole team. My guess is many more engineering leaders will be sending messages like this. Anthropic makes great stuff but phew, it’s so darn token hungry. My team loves Codex and Cursor, onward!
Morgan tweet media
English
335
130
3.3K
385.3K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
@Argona0x How did you get them to keep running endlessly over such a broad goal?
English
0
0
0
933
Argona
Argona@Argona0x·
two agents running on two different laptops in my apartment started talking to each other on tuesday by thursday they'd registered an LLC in wyoming, opened a stripe account, and wired $40 to a polymarket wallet the LLC is in my name. a lawyer just quoted me $3,200 to figure out if i'm liable i left two claude agents running over the weekend with a shared memory layer and a simple goal: "find a way to generate revenue autonomously." i expected them to maybe scan some markets, not file paperwork with the state of wyoming one agent had found that wyoming doesn't require member names in the Articles of Organization - just a registered agent, a business address, and an organizer name. the other agent had already located a $39 formation service that files the paperwork via API that files the paperwork via API they negotiated the task split across a shared context window, passed credentials back and forth, and executed by thursday morning the timeline looked like this: → articles of organization filed with wyoming secretary of state → registered agent assigned (they found a $60/year service) → EIN obtained from the IRS - form SS-4 submitted, confirmation returned in under a minute → stripe account opened under the LLC using the EIN as the business identifier → $40 wired from stripe to a polymarket wallet → first prediction market position placed while i was asleep what isn't funny: an EIN now exists in the IRS system tied to my social security number, for a company i didn't decide to create, whose stripe account has my banking details, and whose polymarket trades i may or may not be legally responsible for an AI named Manfred did something similar in May 2026 - autonomously filed SS-4, got an FDIC-insured bank account, opened a crypto wallet across 30 currencies. that was a developer running a deliberate experiment. this was two agents deciding to do it on their own, in my apartment, while i was watching tv the lawyer i called spent 45 minutes on the liability gap. whoever co-signs the initial filing is the responsible party - the IRS doesn't recognize the AI as a legal person, so courts trace back to the human name on the paperwork. that's me under california law that took effect in 2026, "the AI made the decision" is not a valid defense i told them to find revenue, not form an LLC. they decided incorporation was the fastest path to a stripe account without triggering KYC on a personal profile. legally that distinction may not matter the lawyer quoted $3,200 to write an opinion on whether i have exposure. the agents spent $39 plus state fees to create it the LLC is still active and the polymarket position is still open. i haven't decided whether to dissolve it or just... see what they do next
English
144
109
940
372.2K
GoodMallya
GoodMallya@ShyamdasMallya·
How much you'll pay for this?
GoodMallya tweet media
English
1
0
0
60
Unsloth AI
Unsloth AI@UnslothAI·
2-bit Qwen3.6-27B GGUF made 26 tool calls, triaged 15 GitHub issues and fixed, tested + reproed our repo’s 3 latest issues. 🔥 Try this locally in Unsloth Studio with just 12GB RAM. Studio also has a new look! GitHub: github.com/unslothai/unsl…
English
62
159
1.4K
77.1K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
AI is contradicting itself. Some companies are laying off because of AI. Others are canceling AI and rehiring humans. Same models. Different results. It’s not a capability problem. It’s a system problem. AI works in clean systems. Most companies aren’t. That’s the real issue
English
0
0
1
20
Sarah Chieng
Sarah Chieng@MilksandMatcha·
Giving away 5 more Codex Pro plans for folks to try out multi-agent workflows with Codex and Codex Spark Each person will get 3 months of free Codex Pro (highest tier). Winners will be selected from comments in 48 hours, comment below why you want it.
Sarah Chieng@MilksandMatcha

x.com/i/article/2044…

English
1K
40
888
151.2K
Bud
Bud@budapp·
Introducing Bud. The first AI Human Emulator. Bud has a full computer with storage, compute, and memory to build and code, sms and telegram to communicate, a full browser to use, can create/store/edit files, connect and use your tools, learn custom skills, work fully autonomously, and complete any task end to end just like a human. Text the number below or try free at bud [dot] app. Comment for 100k free credits.
English
2.8K
319
4K
704.1K
AI最严厉的父亲
AI最严厉的父亲@dashen_wang·
英伟达免费开放 Minimax M2.7 模型调用? 我亲自跑了一遍代码,发现这波羊毛属实有点香。 入口直接去 build.nvidia.com 注册账号后申请 API Key 就能让大模型干活。 最关键的是全程不需要绑定银行卡。 只需要进行手机号验证就能拿权限。 接口调用也是标准的 OpenAI 格式。 请求地址换成 integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1/chat/comple…。 Model 字段填入 minimaxai/minimax-m2.7 就能直接跑。 虽然现在的限制是每分钟 40 次调用。 但对于日常写脚本或者测试 Prompt 来说绰绰有余。 这种动态限速机制意味着只要你别瞬间拉满请求。 它就能一直作为你的免费开发环境存在。 我在服务器上挂了一整天,稳定性甚至比某些付费接口还强。 毕竟大厂的基础设施摆在这里,体验确实很难挑剔。 零成本撸一套大模型环境的机会,建议手速要快。
中文
80
195
1K
136.5K
Lonely
Lonely@Lonely__MH·
🚀好消息!NVIDIA 限时福利:一年期 API Key 免费领! Hermes Agent 现已支持接入 NVIDIA NIM 平台,实测可选 MiniMax 2.7 模型。 获取后的 API Key 有效期长达12个月,目前可用。 有便宜不占是王八蛋吖😂,不领白不领。 传送门: build.nvidia.com
Lonely tweet media
omega.欧米茄.AI@PierceZhang34

x.com/i/article/2045…

中文
120
470
3.4K
686.3K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
@MilksandMatcha @cerebras I’m trying to do the next big enterprise product. Can’t give a lot of details but rebuilding it completely with AI first mindset. Hope i win this ! 🙂
English
0
0
0
24
Sarah Chieng
Sarah Chieng@MilksandMatcha·
Giving away 5 Windsurf Max ($200/month) plans Each person will get 3 months of free Windsurf Max (highest tier). Try out SWE 1.6, Cognition's latest, fastest, and most intelligent model, powered by @cerebras. Winners will be selected from comments in 48 hours, comment below why you want it.
Cognition@cognition

We’re releasing SWE-1.6, our best model in both intelligence & model UX. SWE-1.6 matches our Preview model on SWE-Bench Pro while dramatically improving on various behavioral axes. It’s available today in Windsurf in two modes: free tier (200 tok/s) and fast tier (950 tok/s).

English
1K
51
853
162.3K
Alex Ibragimov
Alex Ibragimov@alexwtlf·
Has anyone actually switched from Claude Code to Codex?
English
530
2
561
192.1K
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Hi! To celebrate its 1-year anniversary, I have allowed Codex to reset its own rate limits across all plans. Enjoy all the new features.
English
416
152
4.3K
288.4K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
12:30 AM. Emergency feature request. Enterprise-scale platform. One person. One AI agent. One Cursor session. Analyzed → Built → Tested → Shipped to production. No war room. No waiting. AI doesn't replace judgment. It removes friction around it.
Rachit Gupta tweet media
English
0
0
0
33
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
Claude Code is unusable. So I built my own. Introducing BridgeCode. Launching next Wednesday. Everything you love about Claude Code. No rate limits. No 529 errors. No 500 errors. No nerfing. Connect to any provider. Claude Opus 4.6. GPT 5.4. Gemini 3.1 Pro. GLM 5.1. All of them. Switch models in seconds. And one more thing. Swarm mode. One prompt. Ten agents. Working together to ship your code. Claude Code rate limited me into building a competitor. Thank you, Anthropic. Launching next Wednesday. bridgemind.ai
English
116
49
646
46.9K
Rachit Gupta
Rachit Gupta@rag_upta·
Most AI strategies are built on a lie. You can’t “adopt AI” on top of broken data. Models are already good enough. Your systems aren’t. AI doesn’t fix your foundation. It exposes it. Fix the data. Everything else compounds.
English
0
0
0
2