milky brown sugar coffee

Pada doyan ngelalap daun ini gakkk? WKWKWK Enak loh, tekstur dan aromanya unik banget haha Tapi buset dah susah banget nyarinya, di pasar pun JARANG ada yg jual. Harus metik sendiri di kebon klo mau makan daun beginian haha Ada yg bisa nebak? Pernah nyoba gak? 🤣

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.

Soal copyright: Di dunia akademis, ada perusahaan mafia raksasa bernama Elsevier. Grup pemilik Elsevier merampok £3.3 miliar per tahun. Mafia Jurnal Elsevier menguasai distribusi jurnal akademis di planet. Padahal, mereka tidak berkontribusi terhadap pengecekan kualitas jurnal. Dosen dan peneliti yang mengecek keabsahan jurnal yang dipublikasi tidak menerima royalti apapun dari Elsevier. Untuk mempublikasikan paper ke jurnal milik Elsevier, harus bayar. Untuk mendownload paper dari jurnal milik Elsevier, juga harus bayar. Elsevier sendiri hanya gabut saja. Mereka tidak melakukan apapun kecuali merampok dan memalak. Akibat biaya random dan mencekik yang dipalak oleh Elsevier, hingga ratusan dollar per access paper, universitas-universitas di negara miskin menjerit. Perkembangan riset di negara-negara miskin itu pun terhambat bahkan mati. Bukan hanya negara-negara miskin, universitas di negara-negara kaya juga menjerit dan sempat mengadakan boikot. Budaya publikasi preprint ke Arxiv salah satunya berasal dari sini. Jika paper dipublikasi gratis sebelum dipublish, kita tinggal download preprintnya saja. Sekelompok peneliti di Kazakhstan pun membuat alternatif bernama Sci-Hub yang dengan berani membajak sebanyak-banyaknya paper dari Elsevier dan menguploadnya secara gratis

Resiko KB cewe : Gangguan hormon, kulit break out, kanker, sakit jantung, dan banyak lagi. Resiko KB cowo (kondom) : Ga enak, ga nyaman🥺 ga bisa ngerasain memek langsung huhuhu