Remnite

A trader has two $100K GoatFunded accounts. He made $6,000 on one account and $4,500 on the other. First payout request on the 12th for $6K got denied for “copy trading.” Support said the decision was FINAL. Again, second payout request on the 15th for $4.5K also got denied for “copy trading.” Support STILL said the decision was FINAL. Then a bigger influencer complained about the same issue that same day… and GoatFunded suddenly reviewed HIS case and paid him, calling it a “kind gesture.” Now after multiple draggings left and right, this trader’s $4,500 payout was suddenly paid today. So tell me @GoatFunded @EdwardXLreal … how is his $6,000 still unpaid if both accounts were accused of the SAME copy trading violation? If you had “valid proof” against him, why pay one account and still hold the other? Your own actions are making traders question the entire process. Because if he wasn’t guilty on the second account, then how exactly is he guilty on the first one? 🚩 At this point, it no longer looks like rule enforcement. It looks like public pressure decides who gets justice.

Calling out @GoatFunded. A long thread. I bought a 100k instant prop firm account last month and made $3919 profit after 1 month. I didn't violate any drawdown rule, keeping risk to 0.5% per trade. I requested a payout last Thursday.

Not up to 3mins😳😳😳 Thank you @Khldfx @fundingpips

A lot of emotions are flying around concerning copy-trading breaches in the prop space, but I think it’s important people look at this issue logically and fairly. Every serious prop firm has rules against: •copy trading, •signal mirroring, •passing services, •and coordinated trading across accounts. Why? Because prop firms are built to evaluate independent traders, not networks of traders executing identical positions. From the information shared internally, @GoatFunded does not randomly breach accounts over one similar trade. The firm stated that multiple matching positions and clear trading patterns are reviewed before action is taken, and supporting trade evidence is attached during communication with affected traders. One thing many people don’t realize is that when disputes go public online, audiences often only see screenshots of payout denials — not the full investigation, trade comparisons, or risk analysis behind the decision. That doesn’t mean traders shouldn’t ask questions or seek transparency. They absolutely should. But it also means people should avoid assuming every denied payout is automatically “scam behavior,” especially in cases involving coordinated execution patterns. At the end of the day: •independent traders have nothing to fear. •firms must protect their ecosystem. •and consistent rule enforcement is necessary for long-term sustainability in this industry. Trade your own strategy.
Take your own entries.
Manage your own risk.
That’s the safest path for everyone. ✍️vee

@EdwardXLreal @iamdakejr @GoatFunded You’re a clown bro You don’t pay shit.. Show me a Nigerian that’s not your affiliate with $15k or $20k payout and I’ll delete my tweet..