
Scarpetta
8.1K posts

Scarpetta
@scarpetablog
My earliest memories are of being very sensitive, liberal and vocal. Not much has changed.














🚨 After three years of research, my biography on King Abdullah has been published. You can now order "The Most American King - Abdullah of Jordan"⬇️ amazon.com/Most-American-…




More updates based on new information & findings: New information that has been revealed and shared with me since my last post increases the likelihood of death by airstrike quite significantly. Examining official Israeli Statement: A brief examination of what both Dr. Chen Kugel, Israel’s chief forensic pathologist, and IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari, are saying, and perhaps more importantly not saying. Given the incentives and biases at play, the language and framing used by both Hagari and Dr. Kugel are exactly what we would expect if the Bibas family had been killed in an Israeli airstrike. While Dr. Kugel has previously shared inaccurate information in both interviews and press conferences, whether intentionally or not, I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he is speaking accurately here. In a recent press conference, Dr. Kugel stated, “We found no injuries caused by bombing.” However, this does not mean they weren’t killed by an airstrike. His phrasing could simply mean that the bodies were not exposed to a direct explosion. We know that a significant portion of airstrike deaths occur not from the blast itself but from building collapses, a distinction that his statement does not address. His specific wording allows him to support the official narrative without needing to make any outright false claims. Most notably, he avoided mentioning their cause of death entirely, as well as addressing the allegations of a cover-up. Source: youtube.com/watch?v=WBygsN… Daniel Hagari has a much longer history of blatant misinformation. His statements regarding the Bibas family follow a familiar pattern; vague language and strategic phrasing. “They killed them with their bare hands, afterwards they committed horrific acts to cover up these atrocities” He uses the term “bare hands” but this is still quite vague. Many interpreted this as “choked to death” but he nor anyone from the forensics team has made this claim. Bare hands can also mean blunt force trauma. “Committed horrific acts to cover up these atrocities” seems to suggest that the bodies have some indication of being killed by an airstrike. To be clear: a thorough forensics report should be able to distinguish between “killed in an airstrike” and “killed with bare hands and then an attempt to cover it up” but currently details of such a report don’t exist. He then goes on to say “This assessment is based on both forensic findings through the identification process & intelligence that supports the findings” The inclusion of “intelligence that supports these findings” is worth noting. Interestingly, in a follow-up question, he reverses the order “It’s supported by intelligence, and was supported yesterday by experts at the National Center of Forensic Medicine.” Including intelligence allows for greater flexibility in how the cause of death can be described. Relevant data can be cherry-picked from forensics and the gaps can easily be filled with “intelligence” findings. I found one prior example of Hagari attributing findings to both forensics & intelligence and that is the case of Noa Marciano where they reached the highly implausible conclusion that she was “injured in an airstrike, brought to the hospital only to be killed by Hamas” (elaborated on in my initial analysis) Also, both in English & Hebrew Hagari says "forensic findings from the identification process" not "findings from a forensics report". This wording is very specific and seems to indicate that they're relying far more heavily on "intelligence", with forensics contributing most to the identification. Source: youtube.com/watch?v=qp00JE… He continues and says “We have shared these findings with our partners around the world so they can verify it” A trusted third-party forensics team verifying the report is all they would need to confirm their claims and would be very easy to do. Yet based on a recent report by Ronen Bergman, who has strong ties in the Israeli intelligence community provides significant clarity. In this report he clearly states information sharing is only with the US intelligence but no mention of forensics. Source: ynet.co.il/news/article/b… If in the next week or so there is no independent verification then at that point, we can conclude with near certainty that their official claims are not true. 2. More hostages killed by airstrikes & misinforming hostage families about the cause of death: a) The IDF initially told the family of Israeli hostage Ron Sherman that he was murdered in captivity. A few weeks later a member of Israel’s pathology team reached out to inform them that Ron was killed by carbon monoxide poisoning released from an Israeli bunker-buster bomb. It’s reasonable to assume that the pathology team reaching out was a result of the family of Nik Brezner, who was killed with Ron, requesting a full autopsy report. At that moment the true cause of death could no longer be kept. Source: ynetnews.com/article/h1zan0… b) On January 15th, Hamas reported that Yossi Sharabi was killed in an airstrike. That same day they released a video of Noa Argamani, who was injured in that same airstrike, stating that Yossi was killed. Hagari quickly came out to say that Hamas was lying and that he was murdered but after a month the IDF came out and stated that “Sharabi was most likely killed in an airstrike”. Their investigation into this incident was likely instigated by the fact that Noa, who was clearly injured, corroborated these claims in her video. Source: timesofisrael.com/idf-hostage-yo… c) Mother of released Israeli captive Naama Levi: "From her time in captivity, she mainly has anger towards the state. She feels they tried to kill her because they bombed the houses she was in. In one case, they got out last minute, the wall fell and she was injured. She has hard stories. Her biggest fear was our bombings." Source: ynet.co.il/yedioth/articl… 3. The “returning” of the wrong body instead of Bibas This was attributed to many as an attempt by Hamas at psychological warfare. While this is possible, a far more plausible explanation is simply a misidentification of the body and Israel seems to agree. “A senior Israeli official said that, according to the assessment, Hamas did not deliver her body intentionally – it did so by mistake.” #autoplay" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">ynet.co.il/news/article/s…
The misidentification of the body is far more likely if killed by airstrike than if executed. It’s plausible that it took them days/weeks to recover the bodies from under the rubble where the bodies wouldn’t be in great condition and potentially buried with many others. Identifying two young children with red hair would be easy, but it’s not hard to see a situation where Shiri was confused with another woman in the same building. Misidentification is possible even if executed but far less likely. To conclude: One hypothesis suggests that Bibas is just another instance of tens of thousands killed in airstrikes including at least a dozen other hostages. With Israeli authorities behaving as expected. The other hypothesis suggests that militants for the first time since the start of the conflict (as far as I could find) killed a baby with their bare hands, with no clear incentive. They then manipulated the bodies to make it seem like an airstrike. Israel has proof of this yet for some reason shows no intention to go through the process to verify their claims. I'll let you decide what is more plausible.







