Ndudi⚡️ $TOKÖ

first win of the weekend on @Polymarket ✅✅ i was certain Chelsea could hold out and keep a clean sheet against Burnley. thinking of rotating funds into Liverpool's game but I am not sure of a pick But let's see how Sunderland does in the next game lfgggg

@matthewanietie Thanks chief

Market sentiment is noise. Structure is signal. My BTC/ETH outlook for today ⬇️ Btc on ltf keeps creating new lows, breaking structure to the downside and until we see a clear break of structure to the opposite direction this market will keep trending downwards. Eth on the other hand is replicating same moves with BTC and the trend is still bearish until a clear break of structure in the opposite direction. Key short term levels i am looking at 96.8-98k level as resistance 93-91k as our level of support for the corn A clear break and daily close above 98k could see us again momentum for a run towards our next area of resistance at around 102-104.5k Failure to break and BTC could resume downward trend to 92.8k as target and more sell pressure could push it to 88k. Not to over speculate but follow through levels by levels and giving today is Monday I would love to see how the market react accross all trading sessions. $Eth is holding preety well seeing we have a lot of downward potential on Eth. Thinking of buying for midterm or long term spot hold, wait for price dip into 2700-2500 as that is where we saw High volume activity and could serve as a substantial area for a longer stronger bounce. Short term a break and hold above 3300 will inspire bullish confidence with strong resistance area around 3500 - 3700 General Altcoin review. Alts will still play alongside the influence of BTC and ETH, with many sitting at HTF supports it will be no surprise to see many have shocking breakouts to the upside, only long upon confirmations, look out for LTF break of structure confirming the moves. Also many illiquid tokens will likely see crime, unless you catch the bottom don't chase the green candles. Stay liquidity, protect capital, live to fight another day. May we win always💪💪

@golfwang0x @SentientAGI Wow very informative

people say @SentientAGI is rushing their TGE THEY ARE WRONG 🚨🚨🚨 this is what everyone has been missing I have written almost a 100 sentient articles and I forgot about this key component of their Open-Source approach which is the Economic Layer backed by the $SENT tokens > TGE is not a start or end, its the essential middlepoint the team has been building for years and this is just a reminder of some of the milestones: > the current 100+ agents and models > 100s of research papers > 10s of partnerships > they are built a vibrant community of users, builders, developers and supporters over half a million strong > ran a successful marketing campaign while hosting many events across the world > built the blockchain infra where the economic model will lie now, the TGE is needed to unlock the ecosystem to full functionality > the entire Sentient Model requires a token the $SENT token is tied to a lot when it comes to the open-source AGI vision because it will cover - incentives for developers and builders thats why the fingerprinting model is really important to prove creator ownership. - it will be needed for verifiable payment compute - agent to agent transactions on the networks, I expect full integration of sentient chain and token for payments in the model - staking the tokens will be essential for the security of the network - the token will be used as reward for the loyal and most contributing community members - it will probably be used for slashing penalties against rogue models, agents or builders in the community > why now? and not down the road? this is simple, we are at the crescendo where everything is ready and the token is missing - the ecosystem partners are all ready - the agent economy is ready - the infra has been deployed - the marketing has been superb and precise this is the time to turn on the incentives > how does the openAGI summit come into this this summit is the biggest enterprise level spotlight they have gotten by officially partnering with the likes of AWS, Polygon , Prisma etc. launching a token after showcasing their new demos, capabilities, partners and integrations will create momentum and justify the economic layer this is strategic timing and not klout I think we are at the the most important inflection point for sentient where many will understand that the $SENT token is not "the product" but the coordination engine that bootstraps everything. we are still early in understanding how AGI works, stick with sentient and lets build the future open-source future together

@matthewanietie Well explained thank you chief

$BTC ShortTerm Plan Marked out my zones for liquidity, reaction points and structure shifts and what i will be looking out for and then react as due. I’ll follow price, not bias, reacting level to level. I tilted bearish for the first time after we lost the 110-109k level with a daily close below it. I expected price to take out liquidity resting below and those have been swept, now I am eyeing 101–102k, but traders who took on aggressive longs as price dipped into the 95-94ks level, visible on the daily OB on the chart, can start booking profits around 97–98k as that will be our first trouble zone for price to fill and a possible short entry for traders. If we do break past 97-98k then our next level of concern will be at 101–102k which adds reaction there will probably see price pullback into 98–97k and 94-93k if more sell presure comes in from there. These are my areas of interest 97-98k resistance level (possible flip for more upside continuation) If S/R flip then target remains 102k(Tp 1) 105-106k (tp 2) & 109-110k(tp 3) Bullish case scenario If we reject hard at 98k then sell continues with targets ranging from 93-92k all the way to 88k Watch and react level by level

@matthewanietie I concur

GM GM There are two times a trader needs to take a step back and reassess before making big moves: right after a big win and after a big loss or a series of losses. The actions you take following these two sequences often have a significant influence on your trading account. The moment you start feeling invincible is usually when the market reminds you that you’re not as invincible as you thought. Also, the moment you start feeling beaten by the market and you think it can't get worse, then the worst happens Remind yourself today to always remain logical and data driven.

@golfwang0x @union_build Well insightful and understood

🚨🚨Highly Speculative @union_build post; Proof of mainnet imminent Skip if you are not interested. while doing an on-chain investigation to find out if the $U token has been deployed on the Ethereum mainnet. I stumbled upon the @union_build Bridge Proxy UCS03 contract (could be a multisig), which is live on Ethereum. It currently holds $15M, mostly in uniBTC, which is really unimportant to me. link: #asset-multichain" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">etherscan.io/address/0x5fbe… What caught my attention was an Ethereum address labeled “Union: Deployer 2.” It was created and funded exactly 4 months ago. Address below Union Deployer 2 = 0x95Fb5cb304508d74d855514D7bC9bDA75c304cE2 This address was responsible for deploying the Union Bridge proxy contract and many more pivotal Union Build contracts like > UCS03kgm (likely the bridge contract) > PingPong > IBCHanlder > CometIbcClient, > StateLensIcs23MptClient, etc. These are not random contracts; they’re core infrastructure for Union's interop and IBC stack and are already live 🚨🚨THE BIGGEST CONFIRMATION OF THIS THEORY IS THIS: in the last 7 hours this deployer address created the $U token twice on the Sepolia Ethereum testnet. (all essential details and functions of the token were hidden by the team or not set yet.) link: sepolia.etherscan.io/tx/0x5553ec7ea… this tells me, it is currently being tested and multiple other interop smart contracts are being deployed as I write this This is my thought: If all these transactions were sent out of this single externally owned account (EOA), then this address must also be responsible for deploying the $U token on Ethereum Mainnet (since $U is going to be an ERC-20 token). The $U token contract needs to be linked with other infra (e.g., staking, bridge, governance, or fee collection). $U will almost certainly need to: > Be minted initially. > Have an owner/manager for pausing/minter roles. > before it is assigned to the @UnionFDN for governance (often after deployment). This strongly suggests the same deployer would be used for deploying $U. > All key contracts on mainnet came from this EOA > $U token deployed twice on testnet recently > No other wallet seems to be performing these kinds of sensitive operations > Governance handover is always a post-deploy step, not pre-deploy > $U token needs tight coupling to the bridge and interop infrastructure (which this EOA already manages) Unless they suddenly switch to a multisig or factory (which is unlikely after testing from this EOA), this address will almost certainly be responsible for $U on mainnet. Tagging @corcoder who is the CTO, to confirm or deny if this is real. zkgm

Do you know that @union_build has just one tier 1 investor I have been tracking the performance of all Union investors to try and postulate how $U will perform at TGE. Every day until mainnet, I’ll break down one investor. Tier 1 Investor - @sandeepnailwal (Sandeep Nailwal) He is the current CEO and co-founder of @0xPolygon and is considered a tier 1 investor who has participated in over 130+ funding rounds. Some noticeable projects include > Layerzero > Berachain > Succinct that launched today > Movement > Union Why is this important?? > Investors like Sandeep have influence over how projects launch their mainnet and tokenomics, as they put up substantial investments and will be looking to recoup their investment and some profits. Being able to track how some of their backed projects have performed and how the community reward was distributed, we can know what to expect from Union Build. That being said, the team still decides what route they want to take and ultimately how their community is treated. Why did he invest in Union Build?? As co-founder of an aggLayer (Polygon, AKA Matic), investing in a cross-chain interop project makes so much sense as a business strategy. as Union creates a way for more inflow of liquidity with Polygon from other Cosmos-aligned blockchains and other routes powered by Union. How have others of his projects performed (airdrop and community focus)? > @LayerZero_Core ; those familiar with L0 know that the airdrop was really generous to long standing loyalists and users. This was after outstanding Sybil checks and eliminations to ensure they were rewarding real project alignment. Unlike Union, they had 20x the funding and years of fees generated from mainnet cross-chain transactions. > @berachain : Another L1 with a very good community and good distribution to those who were eligible, the chain keeps growing post TGE. I am not a fan of how the eligibility was carried out; I carried out thousands of transactions and did not get a good drop, but my personal experience is not a framework of how their TGE went. Berachain also have 10X the funding of Union > @movementlabsxyz : raised over $40M and made some of their community rich after some of the most intense testnet activity similar to union and Linea in that aspect. > @SuccinctLabs ; launched today, with a controvesial drop, where community was rewarded in a unique way. Tester were rewarded very poorly but discord community was rewarded handsomely with over 2000$ to most. One thing is for sure: these projects all had amazing launches, and those who were eligible were rewarded handsomely, and it shows that Sandeep has a unique and proven track record of supporting really solid projects. I am looking forward to how Union Build carries out both tester and yapper rewards at mainnet launch, but going by Sandeep's records, I expect union-eligible users to be rewarded accordingly at TGE. I’ll break down a new investor each day. Follow if you’re tracking Union $U closely, and let me know what you think of this series.

@golfwang0x @union_build @PoisonPhang Very Insightful and well comprehensive All we need to do now is wait for mainnet launch which I believe is closer than ever Thanks man for the breakdown

🚨🚨 $U token supply confirmation; @union_build mainnet is upon us I stumble upon what might be the mainnet migration script for Union build on their Github, written in Go by @PoisonPhang. This is a commit from the 15th of July. @union_build appears to be migrating from a testnet/PoA system to a PoS mainnet with the $U token as the primary economic asset, with the foundation initially controlling all staking to ensure network stability during the transition. $U Token Details > Token Name: "U" > Base Denomination: "au" (atto-U) > Total Supply: 10,000,000,000 * 1e18 = 1e28 au (10 billion U) > U token is the gas token on mainnet. This confirms the $U token supply and base domination. au (atto-U) is not auBTC. "au" means "atto-U," or 1e-18 U similar to wei for ETH. The code also confirms the union foundation address and the undelegation and redelegation parameters for validators, strongly hinting at mainnet delegation criteria. Union Foundation Multisig Address > All minted $U tokens are sent to this multisig foundation wallet > This address likely controls treasury and genesis allocations and early staking const UNION_FOUNDATION_MULTI_SIG = "union1cpz5fhesgjcv2q0640u...fem0>" this is the real multisig address controlling $U at genesis . Staking & Validator Reset This portion of the code screams mainnet to me. what it aims to do is > remove all existing delegations > validator self-delegation minimum is reset > validator rewards are claimed and wiped > validator entries are also rewritten it basically cleans slate for staking in preparation of a mainnet launch Re-delegation from Foundation validators get new delegation from the foundation (foundation holds all $U tokens at this point) after the successful validator reset > the foundation account re-delegates to validators what was taken initially. > typically done to bootstrap staking at genesis block Union Governance Parameters Set this part of the code sets governance proposal requirements > govParams.MinDeposit = 10 $U. this is the minimum deposit required to submit a governance proposal and helps reduce spam > govParams.ExpeditedMinDeposit = 50 $U. has a higher threshold that allows proposal leap over queues and enters voting consideration quickly used for urgent cases Staking Parameters Updated these will be the staking parameters applicable at mainnet launch: > bond denomination changed to "au" (the U token base unit) > minimum commission rate set to 5% (0.05) > minimum self-delegation reset to 0 for all validators Old Tokens Burnt if you are familiar with the old testnet tokens then these wont look new to you > burnToken(..., "muno") - union-testnet-10 gas token > burnToken(..., "upoa") - union-1 and union-testnet-10 PoA token > burnToken(..., "ugas") - union-1 gas token My Take From my research and understanding, this will be the transition from testnet to mainnet. it is a mainnet migration script based on Cosmos SDK. > It resets all delegations, wipes rewards, and reassigns staking from the foundation > It mints the entire token supply and sends it to a real multisig > It burns old testnet tokens. > It sets real governance, staking, minting, and fee parameters > It aligns all modules (staking, bank, mint, gov, crisis, fee market) around the new U token. Tagging @corcoder , @0xkaiserkarel , and @e_beriker to verify if this is indeed mainnet code or just a staging upgrade. @0xNexar too can chime in github link: #diff-e3a0234bed803cb5c91147a91e120f902a68f0c9b473ee58f64b47655775809bL1-R240" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/unionlabs/unio… zkgm

@golfwang0x @union_build @anoma @0xkaiserkarel Clear as day

zkgm. @union_build meets @anoma. This is how interoperability and intent orientation are solving web3's biggest bottleneck: Liquidity Fragmentation. > What is Liquidity Fragmentation? First, we have to understand what liquidity fragmentation is and why this is such a big issue for blockchain inefficiency. Liquidity fragmentation is simply the dispersion (scattering) of liquidity (funds/assets) across multiple blockchains, platforms, and protocols. This effectively means that users are unable to utilize their liquidity in a way that is efficient and hassle-free. > Real-World Example I have $1M in ETH on Ethereum Mainnet, but I would love to participate in Solana's DeFi ecosystem. I also want to stake some $SUI natively to be eligible for future rewards. In order to do this, I have to go through multiple different bridges and protocols to get my liquidity across these various chains to complete what I want. This subjects me to smart contract risks, high slippage issues, and time delays. This is inefficient and discourages many people from venturing out into new blockchains to scour the opportunities. This phenomenon also occurs across platforms, even on the same network, where TVL here could not be used efficiently across other platforms. > The Scale of the Issue The scale of liquidity fragmentation is staggering. There is $244B in stablecoins currently in circulation, of which Ethereum and Tron account for over 80% of this supply. This becomes a universal blockchain issue that affects billions of dollars in the blockchain space. Now, imagine a space where these billions in dormant liquidity could be used across all the other networks and platforms without having to incur those risks. This brings about enormous potential for yields and profitability. The chart below shows stablecoin distribution across chains and across sectors. link: app.artemisanalytics.com/stablecoins Follow: @artemis. > Interoperability and Intent Orientation are the solution Cross-chain bridges like @wormhole and @LayerZero_Core have been popular approaches to address liquidity fragmentation, but they often introduce security risks and complexity and time delays. According to @DefiLlama, high-profile bridge hacks have totaled over $2.8 billion as of June 2025. link: defillama.com/hacks However, innovative solutions like @union_build Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) technology and intent orientation from @anoma offer a more robust and future-proof path forward. > @union_build's zk‑IBC: chain‑level trust, not contract‑level trust Inspired by the @cosmos Internet of Blockchain concept, this enables seamless communication and asset transfers between blockchains without relying on traditional bridges. It offers a standard communication channel for applications on two different chains that need to communicate. This is what interoperability is about, cross-chain interactions. Allowing liquidity to flow natively across ecosystems, reducing risks, friction, and delay. IBC now efficiently and effectively exchanges data and assets securely. For example, a user can transfer $ETH from Ethereum to Solana’s DeFi ecosystem directly, without wrapping tokens or relying on third-party custodians. By enabling native cross-chain liquidity, @union_build reduces slippage, eliminates bridge-related vulnerabilities, and simplifies user experiences. Union’s approach has the potential to unify over $47 billion in Ethereum’s DeFi TVL with ecosystems like Cosmos, Solana, and beyond, unlocking massive capital efficiency in DeFi. > The Age of Intent Orientation @anoma 's approach is different and focuses on the issue through intent orientation, a paradigm that redefines how transactions are executed in Web3. It unifies underlying blockchains into a single development environment, ending the fragmentation of state and users that limits today’s decentralized applications. Instead of users manually navigating protocols and bridges, intent-oriented systems allow users to specify their desired outcomes (example, “swap $ETH for $SUI and stake it”). @anoma's advanced solvers then compete to fulfill the users intents by sourcing liquidity across chains and platforms; this is Anoma's distributed operating system for intent-centric applications. Anoma’s intent model could reduce transaction costs by up to 30% compared to traditional bridging by aggregating liquidity from multiple sources (DEXs, order books, or cross-chain pools), as solvers optimize for the best liquidity sources and price. It also enhances user experience by eliminating the need for multiple wallets and gas tokens, aligning with Web3 with Web2-like simplicity. Union’s IBC and Anoma’s intent orientation address the root causes of fragmentation unlike traditional bridges: > Increased user security: IBC’s decentralized design minimizes single points of failure, while intent orientation reduces vulnerabilities from bridge contracts > Increased Efficiency: they streamline acces to liquid issues, effectively reducing slippage and gas costs > Scalability: through the unification of liquidity, DeFi is able to scale effectively, attracting institutional capital and retail users. > Increased Composability: leads to more seamless and integrated user experience, as different protocols and applications work together to provide a more comprehensive service. As liquidity fragmentation is eradicated, the future of Web3 lies in interoperability and user-centric design. Union and Anoma are leading this race, with the vision of a unified, efficient, and accessible blockchain ecosystem for everyone.

@golfwang0x @ikadotxyz @SuiNetwork I will be there no matter what

If missed WAL, Don't Miss This Airdrop Opportunity! 🪂 Meet @ikadotxyz With $21M+ total funding achieved, @ikadotxyz is @SuiNetwork's first sub-second MPC network, scaling to 10,000 TPS with hundreds of signer nodes and zero-trust security. Backed by the Sui Foundation. I'll guide you through the steps to complete the pre-mainnet tasks and get ready for the IKA mainnet. > head to the website: inksack.wal.app > connect your @SuiNetwork wallet and enter a valid referral code to receive a 10% bonus. Tasks 1 and 3 are contingent on owning and staking the "MF Squid Market NFT" which can be gotten from @tradeportxyz > visit tradeport.xyz/sui/collection…. > current cost is around 80.5 SUI or $265. Task 2. (5 Ink droplets per 10 ISUI) > requires you to simply stake your $SUI on @springsui_ and receive $ISUI. springsui.com/SUI-iSUI. > for every 10 $ISUI locked, you’ll earn 5 droplets daily. so the more you lock the more you earn Ink points. Tasks 4 and 5 (50 and 10 Ink Droplet respectively) > requires you to generate your first dwallet; you will be prompted to sign a transaction on the Sui Network. Note: For this you need at least 7-8 Sui tokens on your account to sign this successfully, but there is no charge besides network fees. > then generate the first message to be signed by your dWallet. Tasks 6, 7, and 8. (10 Ink Droplets each) requires you to input your Sui address, Bitcoin address, and Ethereum address, respectively, for a total of 30 ink droplets. Additional Opportunities and Speculations: > @GiveRep a platform that tracks social engagements on X for the @SuiNetwork . You can earn trophies and build reputation by creating engaging content like threads and guides. Write about @ikadotxyz and other SUI protocols and you might just qualify for the airdrop and many others to come. Consistency is key. > @ikadotxyz has a working relationship with @WalrusProtocol and the @SuiFoundation . This makes me feel like by Staking $WAL and $SUI to secure the network you might be securing a piece of the pie. These are mostly speculative but leave nothing to chance especially if you can not afford the NFT. > Join the community and be as helpful as possible, vibe and just maybe theres something in it for you. shoutout to > @MrBreadSmith whose tweets made me aware of @WalrusProtocol and now @ikadotxyz . > @d3h3d_ you are building something amazing > @EmanAbio for supporting builders on the network.

@matthewanietie @ethosx_finance This is a good trading platform for all future traders

Trade high-leverage options with zero liquidation risk @ethosx_finance operps, each 15-min cycle comes with a built-in -50% loss cap — no more sleepless nights over liquidation. Take advantage of Dynamic leverage, Smart risk. Join the bandwagon, trade - operps.kanalabs.io

@monad_xyz 0x0B3d9222fAdB75d5d0C94ec9d6aAb4462C3B28B8

drop your Monad address below within the next 24 hours to receive your soulbound NFT

Walrus Secures $140M in funding and mainnet going live on 27th of March Congratulations to the @WalrusProtocol team for successfully raising $140M. $WAL token distribution Over 60% of WAL tokens are dedicated to the community—fueling airdrops, grants, developer support, incentives, and storage subsidies. 🔹 10% Walrus User Drop – Airdropped to early adopters and earmarked for future distributions 🔹 43% Community Reserve – For grants, dev support, incentive programs, and other ecosystem initiatives 🔹 30% Core Contributors – For early builders who contributed to Walrus 🔹 10% Subsidies – For supporting storage nodes as the fee base grows 🔹 7% Investors – For investors participating in the fundraise. Congratulations to everyone that followed the guide and was eligible.

🤞 I just entered a giveaway for @perceptronntwk from Raid Rewards on #Alphabot 🙏 @alphabot send me your energy ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ 🙏 alphabot.app/20-usdc-wpabk4

# x.com/HaustNetwork/s… @delder @eradotid @golfwang0x

# x.com/HaustNetwork/s… ##EXPLORE explore here

# x.com/HaustNetwork/s… WAGMI