Deep 🔫

@sflorimm Imo cursor and deepseek dont deserves the place in this list

Suddenly it hit me. What happened to DeepSeek? Sora? GitHub Copilot? Llama? Cursor? Perplexity? What happened?

@AlemTuzlak And that tweet wasn't that deep to deserve 10000 words of articles🫪

Its funny how some big AI influencer writes a random tweet and then everyone writes articles on what he meant exactly and how you can use XYZ to achieve what they said.

My current timeline is all about loop, and i am already bored with this tl can someone please change the topic

@adrianpkstream @darekgusto Yes totally agreed

@darekgusto @thephatcoder +1 to what Darek said. With a good reference implementation, strong linting, and exhaustive style and architecture guidelines, the code produced is often more uniform and consistent than the code I would have written by hand myself.

Code review fatigue is hitting hard these days. AI code is getting worse to review not better. Shipping 5+ features a day has turned reviews into a nightmare. We're drowning in PRs. Anyone else feeling this? How do you keep quality high?

@Tech_girlll I see vibe coding as giving the AI the destination, not the roadmap. You describe what you want, and the AI figures out the architecture, implementation, and decisions. Once you're heavily planning and steering those decisions, it's no longer pure vibe coding.

No one seems to agree on what vibe coding actually means. Is it coding without understanding? Coding with AI? Or just a catchy label for modern software development?

@Venkydotdev Prompting is an art 😆

Is prompting an engineering?

@mikeydsoftware Not necessarily faster, but with smaller loops and more focused goals. That way, if there's a loophole or the agent starts drifting, we can catch it early and correct it before it compounds into a bigger issue.

@thephatcoder you mean optimizing the agent loops to be faster?

Agent loop or Human in the loop? Which one produces better software today? 🤔

@Aevmorfop U mentioned exactly what I'm facing right now Sometimes I move so fast that I lose track of what's actually going on and it becomes hard to catch up with my own code and decisions I'll try following your advice shipping one feature at a time but with the highest quality possible

@thephatcoder Sometimes I purposefully go slower so I’m able to follow what’s going on. You don’t need 5 features a day. You need one that’s working super well.

@darekgusto True 🫶

@thephatcoder Everyone loves getting hearts

This X notification is really addictive

@AtSynct Yeah, that's solid advice. Keeping the LLM in its "smart zone" with smaller, focused tasks tends to produce much better results. Once the context gets too broad, models are more likely to miss details, make assumptions, or start doing weird things.

@thephatcoder If you've got a decent underlying architecture and some good skills/rules laid out, most projects can keep the AI generally in-line. I also make relatively small-ish requests so that it's not biting off more than it can "understand" and doing weird things.

@darekgusto I still find value in leading by example For greenfield work I establish the architecture and patterns first. Once they're clear I let the agent handle the repetitive parts. It may not be the fully autonomous 2026 workflow but it gives me predictable results & better consistency

@thephatcoder For me it's primarily leading by example. Meaning, I write enough of the code myself for the AI to know the patterns it should follow. But it's not a solution for 2026, doesn't take advantage of the new goodies.

@DanielSmidstrup Nemotron 3 ultra and minimax m3

Developers, what's your main AI right now ? -> Gemini 3.1 -> Opus 4.8 -> Opus 4.7 -> Sonnet 4.6 -> Codex -> GPT 5.5 -> Grok 4.3

@petergyang Is this the right time to show ads after each prompts 🫪

this agentic coding crack is more addictive than video games smh

@icanvardar Loops ain't leaving us anytime soon

people still writing loops in 2026 how’s life?

@darekgusto Haha its going too fast like i am already missing copy pasting code from chatgpt or claude instead of prompting agents directly 🤣

Are you a prompter or are you a looper? Myself, I'm still stuck in 2025 but trying to catch up with 2026 now in June.

@callmidavid Reviewing AI generated code is becoming a bottleneck to me especially when working with team

So you review every line of code written by Ai?🤌

@mvanhorn That was unnecessary imo 😅

@steipete It's not rocket science many of us have been doing this unknowingly for a while. We just never had the right name for it. Now we do and it's Loop Engineering. XD

Here’s your monthly reminder that you shouldn’t be prompting coding agents anymore. You should be designing loops that prompt your agents.