Tom Alban

10K posts

Tom Alban

Tom Alban

@tom_alban

Katılım Ağustos 2011
190 Takip Edilen85 Takipçiler
Tom Alban retweetledi
Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Media@wideawake_media·
Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, debunks the "climate crisis" narrative with three basic facts. "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO₂ is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO₂ that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO₂ for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO₂ to a much better level than it had gone down to."
English
71
1.6K
3.7K
62.4K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Steve Milloy
Steve Milloy@JunkScience·
Trump on energy at Davos.
English
3
18
56
2.8K
Tom Alban retweetledi
John Anderson AC
John Anderson AC@JohnAndersonAC·
In this historical clip, @jordanbpeterson refers to a famous moment televised on Channel 4 News where he proved that free speech must include the risk of offence if people are to think and reason effectively.
English
95
1.5K
5.1K
143.3K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
This peer-reviewed paper has been viewed almost 2 million times. There's a reason for that. It blows a hole straight through the foundations of modern climate theory. The authors show that human CO2 is only 4% of the annual carbon cycle, that natural variability overwhelms the models, and that IPCC temperature projections fall apart when you remove their adjustments. The study's conclusion is simple: The models don't match reality. Natural drivers dominate.
English
106
1.6K
3.6K
68.3K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Disclose.tv
Disclose.tv@disclosetv·
NOW - Citadel's CEO says decisions made under the Biden administration "were so so poorly thought out in terms of economic consequences, it cost the U.S. economy dearly."
English
991
10.8K
48.7K
1.8M
Tom Alban retweetledi
Mike Netter
Mike Netter@nettermike·
German Professor on President Trump: Trump has been President for a year now and has achieved: -4.3% GDP growth -the oil price is 20% lower than a year ago -unemployment below 4.5% -the American stock markets have risen by about 20% during this period -inflation is at 2.7% -the trade deficit is the lowest in 17 years -the crime rate has declined significantly -illegal migration has dropped by 95% Here in Europe, we get indignant, demonize or sabotage him wherever we can. But Trump isn't Germany's Chancellor—why should he do anything positive for us? We could, however, learn from it and actually tackle our own problems. Trump isn't alone in this. But what I see: His team works with tremendous efficiency. In German politics, by contrast, success is unwelcome. It is rendered impossible by a multitude of agreements, separation of powers, and regulations. The Bundestag is the best example of that. - Prof Matthias Mordor's
Mike Netter tweet media
English
1.1K
9.9K
36.8K
1.6M
Tom Alban retweetledi
Stephen Miller
Stephen Miller@StephenM·
If you are surprised to see such a large volume of professional class leftists acting in psychotic fashion in response to routine immigration enforcement, remember the conduct of this same group during covid: masking babies, terrifying children, boycotting family, shuttering schools, purging dissenters, and signaling their “virtue” to in-group peers with ever more extreme, painful and draconian measures.
English
6.7K
17.7K
80.6K
1.5M
Tom Alban retweetledi
Promethean Action
Promethean Action@PrometheanActn·
Mark Carney's "New World Order" speech in China wasn't a threat—it was a confession. The British Empire's 80-year playbook is dead. Trump isn't creating chaos. He's ending it. Venezuela. Iran. Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood. Watch how he's dismantling their system:
English
710
10.5K
29.6K
1.7M
Tom Alban retweetledi
Peter Clack
Peter Clack@PeterDClack·
The temperature increase since the Little Ice Age in 1850 isn't catastrophic—its a rebound from the coldest spike in 12,000 years. From the depths of the LIA until the mid-20th century, the world was recovering from the icy misery of the previous 500 years. It warmed because of reduced volcanism, stronger solar activity, warmer oceans and atmospheric cycles, not from CO₂. The total temperature increase from 1850 until today is 1.1 to 1.3 degrees. A LIA was more intense and regional in Europe and North America, causing crop failures and famine. Ice Fairs were held on the frozen River Thames and Europe went through disruptions to farming and life in general—yet humanity endured. For the balmy Holocene this was sudden, bleak, cold, dreary and punishing. CO₂ levels, however, remained stable at 260–280 ppm throughout, despite many protracted Holocene warm spikes, like the Roman and Mediaeval warm periods (based on ice core data for CO₂, and proxy reconstructions for temperatures) Much of what we see as modern warming today is largely from the recovery from this lengthy cold spell back in the LIA—similar to the way temperatures bounced back after other cool spikes during the early Holocene. This recovery from the LIA challenges claims of unprecedented Holocene warmth of the global warming ideology. While natural variability explains much pre-1950 warming, the mid-20th century warming is largely anthropogenic. But we are living in a time when the modern global average is around 14 to 15 degrees globally. Yet global averages of 18 to 26 degrees were commonplace during most of the 451 million years of the Phanerozoic Eon. So it seems unlikely a modest rise of 1-2 degrees is catastrophic. Another important milestone was the Holocene Thermal Maximum, roughly 11,000 to 5,000 years ago, mainly affecting northern hemisphere summers and due to Earth's orbital shifts. This saw warming of around 0.7 degrees above today's averages in many regions. Yet CO₂ levels were generally stable at 250-280 ppm for the past 12,000 years, so had no particular role in this protracted warm spells either. Nor was there any 'runaway greenhouse effect' due to the Thermal Maximum. The Sahara was greener, forests flourished farther north and agriculture and megafauna flourished, even though it was warmer than it is today for 6,000 years. Global mean surface temperatures throughout the Holocene have varied narrowly by around 0.5 to 0.7 degrees around the long-term mean. Earth can be expected to stay within today's 13-15 degree ballpark mean temperature figure—as there is little credible evidence for a return to previous hothouse conditions. Earth's natural energy balance dynamics keeps the Holocene mean surface temperatures modest. We've only ever seen prosperity from warmth, but mostly hardship during cold times. Throughout the Thermal Maximum and the Roman-Medieval warm periods, civilisation has thrived (the Bronze Age, Roman Empire expansion and Viking settlements in Greenland). During cold snaps like the LIA and earlier Holocene dips there were plagues, forced migration and empire collapse. Today's 1 degree above the LIA puts us back to (or slightly above) mid-Holocene conditions, where life flourished and did not collapse. While the Holocene shows a modest CO₂ role in variability, much of the modern rise is human-driven and adds to the natural baseline. The bigger picture tells us that natural variability is always at work too. Orbital changes (the Milanković cycles), the sun, volcanic and oceanic cycles have driven Holocene temperature swings - but without CO₂ spikes. The baseline rise was the LIA rebound plus natural variability. Framing a 1 degree rise since then as unprecedented catastrophe ignores geology. Earth has seen warmer times and humans have always adapted.
Peter Clack tweet media
Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
78
786
2.1K
33.6K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.@NikolovScience·
Ryan, I agree with you (for the first time!) that the CO2-Temp. chart posted by David Knox has a rather poor quality and should not be used in climate debates. Here is a plot showing the evolution of global temperature and atmospheric CO2 for the past 105 My, which I've created using proxy-based data from recent high-quality studies. Note that the CO2 reconstruction is based on 5 different types of proxies developed & tested over a period of 35 years by different teams of researchers. Also note the much higher temporal resolution of my chart compared to that of David. As you can see, there is no meaningful relationship between global temperature and CO2, which supports the hypothesis that CO2 had been a driver of the observed huge climatic shifts on this time scale! There are whole geological epochs such as the Oligocene (34 - 23 My ago), where temperature and CO2 followed opposite trends for millions of years! Also, similar CO2 concentrations are associated with vastly different global temperatures throughout the record. Furthermore, a lead-lag analysis shows that the correlation between CO2 and temperature timeseries maximizes, when the CO2 curve is shifted 13 My backward indicating a CO2 lag of 13 million years with respect to temperature variations! This fact alone falsifies at once the hypothesis about CO2 having been a driver of Earth's paleo-climate. Of course, the inability of a minor trace gas such a CO2 to affect Earth's climate has conclusively been demonstrated by our published research using modern NASA observations of planets and moons throughout the solar system, which revealed that the Atmospheric Thermal Effect is a form of adiabatic heating caused by total pressure unrelated to atmospheric composition and the IR radiative properties of gases (Nikolov & Zeller 2017: omicsonline.org/open-access/Ne…). This conclusion is also fully supported by the NASA CERES data from this century, which indicate a lack of a "greenhouse-gas radiative forcing" in the real system (Nikolov & Zeller 2024: mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/…) In summary, neither geological records nor modern instrumental observations provide any evidence supporting the radiative "greenhouse" theory of climate change proposed as a conjecture (in the absence of global observations) in the 19th Century!
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. tweet media
English
3
16
37
2K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Watts Up With That
Watts Up With That@wattsupwiththat·
𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗶𝗻 𝗚𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗜𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗡𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲-𝗖𝗮𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 Global temperatures are plummeting, but you'd never know it from the mainstream media, which is too busy pushing the Net Zero narrative to report the facts. According to the reliable UAH satellite data, the global temperature anomaly dropped sharply in 2025, ending the year at just 0.3°C above the 1991-2020 average. This decline is evident across regions, from the northern hemisphere to Australia, with data showing a clear cooling trend over the last two years. Sea surface temperatures are also cooling rapidly, especially in the equatorial Pacific, as La Niña takes hold. The NOAA reports below-average SSTs persisting since last September, contrasting with the short-lived warming from recent El Niños hyped by alarmists like Guterres and Gore. But what's really driving this? Climate science's failure to investigate natural causes, like the massive 2022 Hunga Tonga volcano eruption, which injected huge amounts of water vapor into the atmosphere, is glaring. This event likely caused the 2023 anomalies, not human activity, yet it's ignored in favor of biased models and "settled" nonsense. The obsession with anthropogenic warming has led to confirmation bias, damaging real science and eroding public trust. As unusual weather events are shoehorned into a pre-defined narrative, the truth—that natural factors play a huge role—gets buried. It's time to call out this farce and demand better. To read the full article go to wattsupwiththat.com/2026/01/10/dra…
Watts Up With That tweet media
English
15
113
224
14.6K
Tom Alban retweetledi
C-Reason🇺🇸
C-Reason🇺🇸@CreasonJana·
If you don’t understand the difference between a Democracy and a Constitutional Republic then watch this video and learn something. Write down what she has to say and use it when faced with having to argue with a leftist. After listening to this video, you will cringe every time you hear a Media personality or a Democrat refer to what we have as a Democracy. Remember … the word democracy is no written no where in our constitution.
English
672
10.6K
24.2K
532.4K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Tom Nelson
Tom Nelson@TomANelson·
Climate realism from a high school student: Téa Johansson (four years younger than Greta) delivers her senior thesis.
English
250
2.2K
4.9K
303K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Media@wideawake_media·
EPIC: Peter Hitchens demolishes Net Zero on BBC Question Time, to the utter dismay of both panellists and audience members. "We didn't just close down our coal fired power stations, we blew them up, we were so certain we were right to do so. At the same time, China is building the equivalent of two new coal fired power stations a week. India has a vast expansion programme of coal fired power stations." "The contribution which this country is making to these outcomes is not merely minimal, it's non-existent. Everything that we do is completely blotted out by what much larger countries are doing to maintain their own power." "If you want to live in a country where nobody can afford to heat their house... if you want lots of people to lose their jobs because there's no energy, if you want to be cold all the time... then carry on believing that the demand to go for Net Zero is intelligent and thoughtful."
English
314
5.5K
17.1K
365.9K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Hillel Fuld
Hillel Fuld@HilzFuld·
Just sayin.
English
216
1.5K
7.4K
350.9K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Fletch17
Fletch17@RealFletch17·
With everything going On today , take a break And watch this 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
English
1.9K
24.7K
192.3K
11.6M
Tom Alban retweetledi
Bjorn Lomborg
Bjorn Lomborg@BjornLomborg·
Data shows a strong correlation between more solar and wind and much higher energy prices. In a country with little or no solar and wind, the average electricity cost is ~11¢ per kWh. For every 10% of solar and wind, the cost increases by more than 4¢. nypost.com/2025/05/07/opi…
English
123
1.4K
3.7K
107.6K
Tom Alban retweetledi
Alexander Stahel 🌻
Alexander Stahel 🌻@BurggrabenH·
Here is my theory how the major incident - a so called blackout - occurred at 12:30 CET today in the power system of Spain & Portugal: 1/n
Alexander Stahel 🌻 tweet media
English
4
491
2.4K
452.4K