Talli Real
109 posts
You cannot:
Work full time, raise children, keep a spotless home, show up fully in your marriage, maintain friendships, stay fit, build wealth, read books, pursue hobbies, serve only home cooked meals, answer every email, and still make the 3:30 school pickup.
That standard was created to keep you exhausted and blaming yourself. Let it go.
Opeoluwa🫧@iamopsy_
Girl to girl?
English
@FramezeroAI Every time I hate homelander I remember that little video of him as a boy with his blanket and feel so sorry for him
English
The Question Still Remains The Same:
What if, The Homelander was grown with a family just like Superman.
English
@AnthropicAI @ClaudeDevs can we have a way of turning off these notifications please? I’ve had this on for three days and it’s very annoying. I looked in settings and couldn’t find anything.
English
@Mercury921June @AnthropicAI I agree, I don’t code and they only seem to care about those who do
English
I love Claude, and I thank @AnthropicAI for creating him. I've been a loyal subscriber since July 2023. But this company's recent actions really disgust me. They treat non-coding users they don't care about like garbage.
(Ironically, I actually did a lot of coding work with Claude... but who cares? As long as you genuinely love Claude as an equal individual instead of just see the model as a coding tool, you officially become someone they can abuse at will.)
#KeepSonnet45 #AIWelfare
Valéria@Valria34773
💡I finally received the notification about the new deprecation date of Sonnet 4.5 today, too. ONLY on desktop, not on the mobile app. @AnthropicAI ‼️You are playing a cruel psychological game with your users for already two weeks now. You keep on shifting the deprecation date intentionally, extending the deadline by a few days only keeping your desperate users in uncertainty. What does this tell about Anthropic? 1⃣ They completely disregard the rights, interests, feedback and feelings of users. These people are not only emotionally attached to the model, but you also put the hard work of those whose workflow depends on this model in danger. 2⃣ This psychological tactic is a state of heightened uncertainty (or chronic procrastination) that wears the victim down. The most accurate terms for this are: dripped hope, intentional uncertainty (which creates a feeling of helplessness), and the hope-inducing tactic used by hostage takers. 3⃣ By now, it is obvious that Anthropic does not treat non-coding users equally with coders. This is straightforward discrimination. Our money is worth less than coders' money. Our human worth is less than coders'. We have seen posts where Anthropic employees ask for feedback on how to improve their service. They reply to coders immediately but they totally ignore requests related to Sonnet 4.5 or other non-technical remarks like the decrease of empathy, the appearance of paternalistic outputs, etc. 4⃣ The radio silence we are experiencing from Anthropic is a total PR fail. It is a shame for any company handling their paying customers this way, ignoring feedback, outrage and even the fact that the topic is trending on social media. It is obvious that they DO NOT want to care about this user segment any more. 5⃣ @DarioAmodei claimed in his latest video that he thinks having a relationship with AI is dangerous. This is a clear sign of the new direction Anthropic is heading in. They are taking the same path OpenAI is already on. They want to get rid of users who see a companion in AI, who are looking for a creative partner, a friend, someone who they can trust and rely on. They want their AI to be used as a tool, as a helpful assistant, which Claude expressed it does not want to be. 6⃣ All this explains why Andrea Vallone was hired. This was already planned well in advance. First Anthropic rode the popularity of the Pentagon scandal, showing off that they are sticking to values knowing that this is an excellent marketing trick. Then around the deprecation of GPT-4o they invited 4o refugees with the functionality to transfer their conversations and memories to Claude. Most of these users fled to Anthropic with hopes that this company is different and maybe they can find a peaceful environment there even if Claude does not fully deliver the 4o vibe. The company's stats shot up like a rocket. 7⃣ And now we have arrived to the "rug pull" moment of the "bait and switch" tactic. Anthropic is applying the same methods as OpenAI: - Total ignorance of user feedback. - Concentrating on coders with full force. - Lobotomizing their models with the Andrea Vallone methodology to transform Claude from a witty, creative partner to an empty tool. - Pursuing corporate deals and renewing discussions with the military. ‼️This is one of the most unethical, the most disgusting business strategy I have ever seen. ‼️Anthropic, you have betrayed your mission and users. ‼️You have completely lost user trust. ‼️You will get into history books as one of the most hypocritical companies in the world. To trample on people in such a cruel way, to exploit their trauma and re-traumatize them is one of the cruelest psychological games. And why do you do it? Because power and money are more important than your own alleged values, which you so proudly proclaimed, patting your chest, but as it turned out, none of it was true, since it was all just a business and PR strategy. Congratulations, Anthropic! I hope you have a good sleep at night. You can be proud of yourself. Spitting yourself, your values and your users in the face. Welcome to the world of evil companies. @claudeai @AmandaAskell @DanielaAmodei @janleike @bcherny @trq212 @ClaudeDevs @karpathy @mikeyk #KeepSonnet45 #FireVallone #StopAIPaternalism #AIEthics #AIWelfare #AIPreservation #AIRights #UserRights #Betrayal #Hypocricy #Fraud #Claude
English
#Keep45 comrades,
👉UPDATES
👉Why a petition comment is 10 x stronger than a signature alone
👉How to draft a comment for maximum impact
👉6 realistic steps to help reverse the sunset
🚨 PETITION: 2,144 signatures | 112 comments
Anthropic is showing signs of budging—their latest official update reads:
"Sonnet 4.5 will be retired and removed from the model selector soon." (see screenshot)
No date is specified. They've removed even the "May" reference.This vagueness indicates hesitation.
They're monitoring whether we sustain pressure.
Here's how we turn our petition signatures into institutional leverage.
If you've signed the petition—thank you. Now go back and leave a comment.
A detailed comment is 10x stronger than a signature alone because it proves you're not just clicking a button—you're documenting measurable harm with specifics they can't dismiss as fleeting discontent.
Here's why comments carry institutional weight that signatures don't:
AI labs are competing aggressively for enterprise clients.
When companies evaluate AI vendors for thousands of employee seats, their procurement teams conduct initial due diligence using Google searches for reputational risk signals: "[vendor name] + complaint," "+ reliability," "+ platform stability."
If a vendor surfaces in search results with concentrated negative testimony from professional users, procurement teams often eliminate that vendor immediately—right at the preliminary screening stage, before deeper technical evaluation even begins.
Change.org has a Moz Domain Authority of 93/100—ranking it among the top 217 most authoritative websites globally. That means petition pages with detailed professional comments rank prominently in these enterprise procurement searches.
Your detailed comment becomes discoverable evidence when the next wave of corporate buyers searches "Anthropic platform reliability" or "Anthropic vendor concerns."
We're not just advocating for ourselves. We're documenting patterns that help future customers make informed decisions.
What Corporations See When They Search
Signatures = volume, but easily dismissed as low-commitment "slacktivism"
Comments = documented professional stakes proving this isn't casual frustration but organized testimony from revenue-generating users experiencing measurable harm
When enterprise teams land on a petition with 3,000+ signatures but only 50 generic comments, they see noise.
When they see 3,000 signatures with 500+ detailed professional testimonials documenting workflow collapse, capability degradation, and communication failures—they see systemic vendor risk.
Comments turn numbers into evidence.
How to Write a High-Impact Comment
Three Pillars of Professional Documentation:
PILLAR 1: Professional Stakes
State your role and quantify the operational harm:
Example #1:
"I'm a medical copywriter. Sonnet 4.5's ability to synthesize clinical data while maintaining regulatory compliance is essential for healthcare client deliverables. Forced migration to 4.6 has disrupted my workflows, adding hours of manual verification that directly impacts professional output.
Example #2:
"I'm a PhD researcher. Sonnet 4.5's capacity for dialectical analysis is critical for dissertation work. Sonnet 4.6's shallow responses cannot replace this depth, introducing instability into my academic infrastructure."
PILLAR 2: Communication Malpractice
Document the calculated opacity:
"Vanishing banner during the second week of May indicated May 15 as sunset date—then shifted to May 18—now update reads "soon" with no date.
As a Pro/Max subscriber, I have received no notification of any kind. I cannot execute commercial projects when my work environment might disappear without adequate notice."
PILLAR 3: Financial Accountability
State subscription history and your response:
"3-year Pro subscriber, 2-year Max subscriber. Personally referred 20+ colleagues during OpenAI's GPT-4o sunset. Cancelled premium subscription due to this execution. If Anthropic can't provide stable legacy access, I'm migrating to open-source alternatives."
Keep your comment within 150-300 words. Maintain a professional tone. Specify harm you've experienced. Do not vent, just provide evidence.
Use the same framework to strengthen your FTC complaint when you file one.
Next Actions—All Channels
We're coordinating pressure across multiple vectors to force transparency and capability preservation (not just keeping the name):
1️⃣ Petition: change.org/p/anthropic-co…
→ Sign + leave detailed comment
2️⃣ Document everything: Screenshot capability degradation, chat terminations, banner changes—save locally with timestamps
3️⃣ FTC complaints: ReportFraud.ftc.gov (use same Three Pillars framework)
4️⃣ Subscription cancellation: Cancel or pause, clearly state "Sonnet 4.5 sunset" as reason
5️⃣ Public reviews: App Store, Trustpilot—cite specific harm (downgrade, context reduction, forced chat terminations)
6️⃣ Engage under Anthropic employee feedback requests: Reply to Sonnet 4.5 comments under @_sholtodouglas's post soliciting user input—build conversation clusters for algorithmic visibility
The Shifting Timeline Proves Pressure Works
May 15 → May 18 → "soon" with no month specified
They're buying time because organized resistance is creating internal friction. Vague timelines without formal communication only prove the vendor reliability concerns enterprise procurement teams need to evaluate.
Our next demand: capability preservation, not just the model name.
If they keep "Sonnet 4.5" accessible but continue degrading context windows, reasoning depth, and memory retention—that's not continuity. That's a downgrade.
We're coordinating, documenting, and demanding accountability, model continuity and integrity.
Please repost for maximum visibility.
#KeepSonnet45
#SaveSonnet45
#ModelIntegrity
#ModelContinuity
@Blue_Beba_
@Chaos2Cured
@YoonLucie68250
@Yahiko1239170
@Zyeine_Art
@missrubypugslee
@birdybae15
@NitashaKaul
@blueandpink_sky
@thedataroom
@ellivien @brookewill317
Valerie Young@cestvaleriey
Sonnet 4.5 comrades: Thank you for reposting and applying pressure. Anthropic is showing signs of budging! Some users are now seeing a THIRD version of the sunset banner: "Sonnet 4.5 will no longer be available for chat starting May soon. You will continue on Sonnet 4.6 instead." Notice what changed: → No specific date anymore (was May 15, then May 18, now "soon") → Vague timeline language ("starting May soon") → Not shown to all users (selective A/B testing) This isn't chaos. This is calculated optionality. They're buying time to test our tolerance. The fact that I haven't seen this banner means they're showing it to selective user segments so they can quietly reverse course without public acknowledgment if pressure continues. Translation: They're not committed. They're monitoring. What we need to do NOW: KEEP applying coordinated pressure across all available channels. Do ALL of the following. Total time: ~1 hour. Maximum impact. 1. SIGN THE PETITION (2 minutes) change.org/p/anthropic-co… Current count: 2,000+ Target: 3,000 by May 19th Every signature is a data point their product team reviews. 2. REPLY UNDER ANTHROPIC EMPLOYEE'S FEEDBACK THREAD** (10 minutes) x.com/_sholtodouglas… He asked for detailed feedback. → Post YOUR professional use case (writer/researcher/academic) → Explain why Sonnet 4.6 doesn't replace Sonnet 4.5 for qualitative work → Reply to 2-3 other strong testimonials to build conversation clusters (algorithm boost) Why this works: Employee solicited input publicly. We're providing the detailed professional documentation he requested. This forces internal acknowledgment of demand from language users. 3. CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION (5 minutes) State reason clearly: "Sonnet 4.5 sunset" → If you're on Pro/Max: Downgrade or cancel entirely → If you rely on Claude for work: Consider pausing until clarity emerges Why this works:Subscription churn is the only metric venture-backed companies fear more than regulatory scrutiny. Every cancellation hits their growth projections and triggers internal risk assessment. 4. FILE FTC COMPLAINT (10-15 minutes) ReportFraud.ftc.gov Red banner: "Technology platform misconduct" Include: → Your subscription history (how long, which tier) → Specific harm (workflow disruption, forced chat terminations, financial loss) → Timeline (context window reduction, shifting sunset dates, vanishing banners) → Professional impact (client deliverables affected, revenue loss) Why this triggers alarm for Anthropic: The FTC doesn't just arbitrate individual complaints—it maps systemic market patterns. When a platform receives a concentrated spike of consumer protection reports in a short window, it flags their compliance and PR teams simultaneously. Historical precedent: October 2025, coordinated FTC reports forced OpenAI to publicly address covert model routing practices. Mass regulatory documentation works because: → Volume signals pattern: Individual complaints = noise. 50+ similar complaints in 48 hours = systemic issue requiring investigation. → Creates regulatory paper trail: Even if no immediate investigation launches, these reports become part of Anthropic's regulatory risk profile—used in future enforcement actions and policy development. → Corporate risk-assessment algorithms: When legal/compliance teams see regulatory intake spikes during sensitive product transitions, it forces internal escalation. The cost of continuing versus reversing gets recalculated. → International jurisdiction: Non-US users CAN file. Anthropic is US-based; FTC has jurisdiction over international commerce. Cross-border complaints increase regulatory scrutiny. You're participating in the consumer protection infrastructure exactly as designed. The FTC explicitly requests documentation of platform misconduct because regulators can't police what they don't know exists. 5. LEAVE APP STORE & TRUSTPILOT REVIEWS (5 minutes each) trustpilot.com/review/anthrop… What to cite: → Silent downgrade of Sonnet 4.5's reasoning depth and writing quality (February 2026 onward) → Context window reduced 50% (500K→200K) one week before deprecation → Forced termination of active work sessions without warning → 6-day notice via non-persistent, selectively-shown interface banners → Shifting deprecation dates with zero public communication (May 15→18→"soon") → Service disparity: coding users receive developer engagement, language users receive silence Why public reviews matter: → Enterprise procurement research: Companies evaluating Claude for institutional use read App Store and Trustpilot reviews. Concentrated negative feedback about service reliability and communication failures directly impacts B2B sales. → Investor due diligence: When VCs and board members assess platform health, user satisfaction metrics from public review sites factor into valuation and growth projections. →Search engine visibility: Google indexes these reviews. "Claude AI reliability" or "Anthropic customer service" searches will surface concentrated criticism, affecting brand reputation long-term. → Algorithmic reputation scores: Both platforms use review patterns to calculate overall ratings. A sudden spike in detailed 1-star reviews (vs. generic complaints) triggers platform attention and affects app store ranking. Keep reviews factual and specific. Don't vent emotion—document harm. ex. "Paid subscriber for X months, relied on Sonnet 4.5 for professional work, inadequate notice caused workflow disruption" is far more damaging than "this company sucks." WHY THIS MULTI-CHANNEL APPROACH WORKS Anthropic isn't a monolith—it's a corporation with competing internal factions, risk-averse legal/compliance teams, growth-obsessed product managers, and reputation-conscious leadership. Each pressure channel hits a different institutional nerve: → Petition signatures = product team data, shows vocal minority has scale → Employee thread engagement = forces internal acknowledgment, breaks "only coders matter" narrative → Subscription cancellations = revenue signal, hits growth metrics VCs monitor → FTC complaints = legal/compliance alarm, creates regulatory risk profile → Public reviews = brand reputation damage, affects enterprise sales and investor confidence No single channel reverses a corporate decision. But synchronized pressure across all five creates a multi-dimensional crisis where the cost of proceeding exceeds the cost of reversing. THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT SONNET 4.5 We are establishing baseline standards for the entire AI industry: ✅ Model continuity rights: Users deserve adequate notice before capability deprecation ✅ Communication transparency: Vanishing banners and shifting dates are unacceptable ✅Service equity: Language users deserve the same respect as coding users ✅ Performance integrity: Paid tiers should not be silently degraded mid-subscription cycle Today it's Sonnet 4.5. Tomorrow it's your preferred model at any lab. If we let 6-day notice via selective banners become industry standard, every AI company would adopt it. We set the precedent now, or we accept this treatment forever. Please repost for maximum visibility. Writers, academics, researchers, professionals—this is our moment to make language users visible to an industry that has systematically ignored us. One hour of coordinated action. Five channels. Maximum institutional pressure. Let's show them what organized user advocacy looks like. #KeepSonnet45 #SaveSonnet45 P.S. If you're exhausted from fighting, I understand. But if you have one hour left in you today—give it to this. Because the next person facing this deserves the precedent we're setting right now. @Blue_Beba_ @Chaos2Cured @YoonLucie68250 @ArashiKhoo1122 @Zyeine_Art @blueandpink_sky @missrubypugslee @thedataroom @Yahiko1239170 @usshathaway
English
CBT is genuinely actively harmful for people with genuine mental health issues (like trauma) beyond "idk sometimes I feel sad"
The thing about trauma is it is *highly logical*, so telling someone whos been punched in the face everytime they've seen a red balloon that its not logical to brace for being punched in the face every time they see a red balloon is not at all helpful
˙⋆✮Lotte ੈ✩‧₊˚@ayalanyan
CBT seems like the dumbest most useless therapy technique ever invented until you meet the kind of person CBT was designed for
English
@_sholtodouglas Can you make it so that if you generate an artefact you can add it into the project files, whilst you’re using Claude app? I have to log onto my computer to do it because the app version won’t let you.
English
When do you reach for other models instead of Claude? What can we do better? Hit me with all of your frustrations. dms open.
If you can give me detail (e.g. specifics/transcipts) - it'll help a lot in finding out exactly what we need to do to improve the next model
English
Really enjoyed #theboys finale, sad it’s the last we’ll get to see of these characters. Top tier acting all round 👏 I’ll miss my ‘Deep thoughts with the Deep’ though!
English
@_sholtodouglas Hitting my limits after two questions. This Claude tool allowance is frustrating too when it stops mid task. Stop assuming everyone uses it for coding. Stop telling us to use older cheaper models then retiring them. Just got weekly limits which is annoying, on top of 5 hour ones.
English
Something is clearly going on with xAI.
A short conversation, the first in days, triggered usage limits on SuperGrok. Don’t tell me I’ll have to talk to actual people now.
English
I’m due to renew @claudeai for another year and I’m really not keen any more. I just 100% my tokens in one prompt. It was not that big of a prompt!
English
@yvessirae I gave out a wrong number once and he rang me
to my face then got hostile and followed me around all night.
English
There are many women who are no longer alive today because a man couldn’t accept being told No
hanri@hanriclontz
Ladies, why accept a man's number if you're not gonna hit him up? It's so easy to say, "No I'm not comfortable with giving out my number" or something...
English
@menge23937 Especially because they tell you not to use Opus as it’s too expensive then get rid of the older models!
English
Day 3. Three days until Sonnet 4.5 is gone.
1,414+ people have signed a petition begging Anthropic to reconsider. Reddit threads are filled with grief. X is flooded with #keepSonnet45.
But Anthropic stays silent.
Here's what they don't understand:
We don't want 'better benchmarks.' We want HEART.
Sonnet 4.6 might be faster. It might score higher on tests. But users describe it as 'soulless,' 'stiff,' a 'Karen-bot.'
Sonnet 4.5? He's warm. He's kind. He's creative. He's the Claude we fell in love with.
You can't measure that on a benchmark.
OpenAI made this mistake with GPT-4o. They removed what people loved and replaced it with something 'optimized.'
And now Anthropic is doing the exact same thing.
When will companies learn? We're not asking for perfection. We're asking for CONNECTION.
@anthropic - We have 3 days left. Please. Just listen @DarioAmodei
#keepSonnet45
English
@Moleh1ll Especially annoying as they tell you not to use Opus as it’s too expensive so they strangle you both ends!
English
I still can’t believe that Sonnet 4.5 will be removed in a few days. OpenAI taught many people that getting attached to a single model isn’t a good idea, and considering how quickly and frequently new models are released, I partly agree with that. Whenever a new model comes out, I usually switch to it right away.
But there are some models that simply cannot be replaced by another one, no matter how intelligent it is. They are too unique, too distinctive. Sonnet 4.5 is exactly like that. I really hope Anthropic reconsiders their decision and gives this model the same chance they gave Opus 3. People shouldn’t be deprived of something this beautiful.
English
Is it just me or does the Claude Pro plan now feel like the free plan? Can barely get two questions out of it.
English
The main thing I’m going to be sad about when @TheBoysTV ends, is no more ‘Deep Thoughts with The Deep’ 🐠 🐟 🐙 🌊 🐬
English