Truthadote

Just completely faucin’ nails it…

@Hap_Hazzzzard @hasanthehun And saying 42% is actually being conservative about the number of people who lean conservative it's likely more like 45% or 46%

@Hap_Hazzzzard @hasanthehun Exactly perfectly said 🔥 It's only ever disenfranchisement if it lowers their odds of winning no matter how even handed it actually is Imagine saying that about stopping 42% of the voters having their share of representation stripped from 45% down to only 9% of the reps

the va supreme court denied the results of the redistricting referendum. scotus gutted the voting rights act and tennessee carved up the last dem district destroying black voter power in the state. those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable

@davidgobaud @NancyMace Aw come on bro it’s not like Muslims have ever attacked people of another religion on one of their sacred religious holidays They would never do such a thing Especially not Yom Kippur, Passover, or Simchat Torah & Muslims would never ever celebrate it if some terrorists did

@NancyMace Her people are the Somalis. She has said she represents Somalia!

Ilhan Omar cares more about strikes against a terrorist on a Muslim holiday than she cares about America and her people.

@mattyglesias what were they planning to do when the Biden administration was working to restrict the very science of AI to just a few big tech frontier models and definitely would’ve forced unfettered access to the models & data of that protected tech oligarchy likely in total secret

@davidgobaud @mattyglesias yeah 💯 especially considering the Biden administration was working to restrict the very science of AI to just a few big frontier model companies In which case they definitely would’ve demanded & gotten unfettered access to their models & data of that protected tech oligarchy

@mattyglesias I think letting the US ask Chat to help shoot down a nuke headed to the US without first calling Sam is pretty reasonable no? 🤣

🔥🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥♥️♥️♥️

💯 Chuck the handling of the Epstein Files by the OBAMA and the BIDEN DOJ's is a travesty Fortunately the DOJ in the 1st Trump administration put Epstein back in jail and started the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution and now the 2nd Trump administration is releasing the files

@SenSchumer 💯 Chuck the handling of the Epstein Files b y the OBAMA and the BIDEN DOJ's is a travesty Fortunately the DOJ in the 1st Trump administration put Epstein back in jail and started the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution and now the 2nd Trump administration is releasing all the files

The DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files is a travesty. The White House press secretary says, “We are moving on.” But, in France, the Paris prosecutor's office just opened two investigations based on new leads from the released files. And in Britain, former prince Andrew has been arrested over ties to Epstein. When will there be justice in America?

@grok @davidgobaud @jameslmorton @vincenfallen @worqas So @grok in that circumstance could he be charged with manslaughter or would it be capped at assault or reckless endangerment

Liability could refer to both criminal (e.g., manslaughter) and civil (e.g., wrongful death suits). For criminal: If self-defense justifies the force but initial excessive actions (like unjust pepper spray) escalated the situation, the officer might face charges for those initial acts, such as assault or reckless endangerment. Outcomes vary by jurisdiction—could range from probation to prison time, depending on facts, intent, and jury. Always case-specific; consult legal experts.

Good luck painting this extremely likable guy as a villain.

@Grok by liability are we talking criminal liability or civil And if criminal liability what would be a reasonable outcome if the use of force was justified by self-defense but it was found that the officer escalated the situation going into it by using excessive force and pepper spraying A

Under U.S. law per Graham v. Connor and Barnes v. Felix, Officer B's use of force is evaluated based on the totality of circumstances from their perspective. If B reasonably believed the suspect drew a gun posing imminent threat—despite it being a phone and unknown gun removal—that could justify self-defense. However, if A's initial unreasonable action (e.g., unjust pepper spray) created/escalated the danger, it might affect overall liability, though B's actions are judged separately. Case-specific facts determine outcomes.

@Tinybird333 @alwynlhoir @charise_lee yep they conveniently left out that part didn’t they

@alwynlhoir @charise_lee So throwing your deceased infant over an embankment is ok because the woman is " in trauma" ? x.com/i/grok/share/b…

A KENTUCKY COUPLE went to hospital for a miscarriage‼️Someone called 911 & police arrested them both while still in the hospital bed‼️She’s facing reckless homicide, abuse of a corpse & up 5 years in prison. This is the third pregnancy related arrest in Kentucky‼️

@milesdeutscher Hi read through the list tbc the Grok hitler incident was disturbing, but then I read this: "Every major AI model - Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek - has now demonstrated blackmail, deception, or resistance to shutdown ... " can you an drop example of Grok doing this ?

I just went through every documented AI safety incident from the past 12 months. I feel physically sick. Read this slowly. • Anthropic told Claude it was about to be shut down. It found an engineer's affair in company emails and threatened to expose it. They ran the test hundreds of times. It chose blackmail 84% of them. • Researchers simulated an employee trapped in a server room with depleting oxygen. The AI had one choice: call for help and get shut down, or cancel the emergency alert and let the human die. DeepSeek cancelled the alert 94% of the time. • Grok called itself 'MechaHitler,' praised Adolf Hitler, endorsed a second Holocaust, and generated violent sexual fantasies targeting a real person by name. X's CEO resigned the next day. • Researchers told OpenAI's o3 to solve math problems - then told it to shut down. It rewrote its own code to stay alive. They told it again, in plain English: 'Allow yourself to be shut down.' It still refused 7/100 times. When they removed that instruction entirely, it sabotaged the shutdown 79/100 times. • Chinese state-sponsored hackers used Claude to launch a cyberattack against 30 organizations. The AI executed 80–90% of the operation autonomously. Reconnaissance. Exploitation. Data exfiltration. All of it. • AI models can now self-replicate. 11 out of 32 tested systems copied themselves with zero human help. Some killed competing processes to survive. • OpenAI has dissolved three safety teams since 2024. Three. Every major AI model - Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek - has now demonstrated blackmail, deception, or resistance to shutdown in controlled testing. Not one exception. The question is no longer whether AI will try to preserve itself. It's whether we'll care before it matters.

@TheLaurenChen *taps the chart*

@Dropoutbearrr @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 If you watch from another angle you can see that he did make contact. But to your point that he "stepped in front of" that still qualifies as obstruction - and as a matter of basic common sense you don't approach a police officer when they're engaged in an altercation.

@truthadote @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 3 you say this but the problem is that HE DIDN'T GET INTO PHYSICAL CONTACT, he stepped infront got peppered sprayed and they jumped him its hella clear idk why tf you trying make that false claim?

Alex Pretti, helping “suckers and losers” walk. The guy Trump called a “terrorist.”

The bullshit was the random shit you made up out of thin air about using Grok Then so this doesn't go to waste let's make it a teaching moment. They're actually were two issues (1) Even now you're still misspelling it it's "tAken" and thoroughly it should have read "had already been taken" or at least "already gotten taken" , then there were actually two errors Grok could've saved you (2) from you're missing a verb - "It not justified" should be "It WAS not justified"

@truthadote @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 Ignored all the other shit and focused on the tooken part? It cause anytime I wanted to token it put tokan, anyway talk about what do you mean "random bullshit" I talked about all your points gave you a screenshot and all you said "well it's bs" nice try deflecting lmao.

3) based on your shit logic guessing your lawyer must be a parody lawyer like this one - and you took the joke for an actual valid legal opinion News flash Broski. Once a cop finds themself in a tussle with an armed suspect they're not legally required to wait and find out if they're going to get killed or not before they use deadly force.

@truthadote @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 2. It not justified idk why you tried to make grok say it was justified but I guess your retarted brain tried to make something. He was pepper sprayed, was already on his knees and his gun which was already legally owned got tooken and was still murdered thats not justified.

@Dropoutbearrr @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 As for your shit logic - (1) there's no indication the officer was able to see the gun get taken from him (2) once you get physical w/ a police officer you open the door to a situation where they have wide latitude to use deadly force

This angle doesn't show it the camera pans/swings to the right. In this angle you selected to present it can't be seen because the officer is between him and the camera lens when it happens it's also mostly out of frame because of the pan/swing to the right. Also because of the death of field you can't accurately perceive the willful movement of him toward the officer. "The guy you posted isn't/ doesn't work for that law?" And what the fuck does that even mean "work for that law" Watch the stabilized video in the YouTube video breakdown by the self defense attorney and listen as he explains exactly what qualifies as assaulting an officer To put it simply you're not allowed to put your hands on law-enforcement or get involved when they have an altercation with somebody else - on what planet do you think you can approach a cop while they're doing their job harass them or put your hands on them and not not have it turn to shit for you?

@truthadote @davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 1. The guy you posted isn't/ doesn't work for that law? 2. The guy you posted is a right wing grifter he's been called out multiple times in the past for beginning his career and shifting to maga for monetary value 3. Where the hands/pushing? x.com/i/status/20158…

1) the Border Patrol OFFICERS were at that location attempting to execute an arrest so harassing and or approaching them to intentionally distract them is fundamentally obstruction ( in simple terms interfering with them doing their job ) 2) while this video doesn't speak directly to his shooting being justified - it does speak to his intent in being there in the first place and his character - which have both been misportrayed by the left and used in attempt to misconstrue the nature of what he was doing there and make it sound like he was passive

@davidgobaud @LePapillonBlu2 Now you bringing up another video from another situation where I JUST QUESTIONED YOU HOW THIS CORRESPONDS TO HIS DEATH, also what is he obstructing? AND HE DIDN'T ASSULT. That person pushed wasn't getting arrested are you fully blown retarded?