Anonymized

Hal Cranmer says assisted living is where the elderly are sent to wait till they pass away. Cranmer owns four assisted living homes in Arizona. When he first got into the business, he noticed something that bothered him. None of the residents were getting better either. They were treated like cardboard boxes at a storage unit - stacked out of the way, forgotten and slowly falling apart inside. He asked everyone in the industry why no one was trying to improve their health. The answer he kept getting was, "Well, they're old, so they don't get better." Cranmer thought that was nonsense. The standard assisted living model includes diaper changes, bingo, showers, three meals a day, and medications managed by outside doctors. Health improvement is not part of the protocol. Cranmer rejected the model and started cutting sugar, adding trainers, and putting his residents on low-carb diets. Nine of them have now moved back home in his decade running it. The industry built itself on managed decline because nobody told the elderly that recovery was still possible. — Hal Cranmer (@HalCranmer)

BREAKING: We did it. We have formally filed a Citizen’s Petition to the @FDA demanding that HCQ and Ivermectin be made available over the counter. This isn’t just about medication—it’s about your fundamental right to medical freedom. We will not let the medical industrial complex dictate what you can and cannot access. Please Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content. Follow @ZakariaMDv3

A Wharton economist ran a randomized controlled trial on almost a thousand high school students in Turkey. The result was so brutal for the AI-in-education narrative that it had to be peer-reviewed by PNAS before people would believe it. Her name is Hamsa Bastani. She teaches operations and information at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and the study she published in 2025 alongside her co-authors is one of the cleanest experiments anyone has run on what AI actually does to learning when you remove it from the equation and check what is left. The setup was a randomized controlled trial, the same methodology used in clinical drug trials. Nearly a thousand high school math students in Turkey were split into three groups and put through four sessions of ninety minutes each. One group practiced with GPT Base, a standard ChatGPT-4 interface that could answer any question directly. One group practiced with GPT Tutor, a version of the same model that had been prompted to guide students with hints rather than hand them the answer. One group practiced with nothing but their textbook and their own head. During the practice sessions, the AI groups looked like a miracle. The GPT Base group solved 48% more problems than the students working alone. The GPT Tutor group solved 127% more. Every administrator looking at those numbers would have written a press release about the transformative power of AI in education and moved on. Then the actual exam came, and AI was not allowed. The students who had practiced with GPT Base scored 17% worse than the students who had practiced alone. Seventeen percent worse, despite having solved nearly half again as many problems in the sessions leading up to it. The students who had struggled the most, who had sat with the confusion and worked through it without a tool to rescue them, were now the only ones who could actually do the math when it counted. Bastani's team read through the chat logs to understand what had actually been happening during the practice sessions, and the answer was exactly what the exam results had already implied. The GPT Base group had not been learning. They had been extracting answers and moving on, and every moment that felt like understanding was actually the model doing the cognitive work while the student's brain waited for the next problem to arrive. The paper describes it precisely: without guardrails, students attempt to use GPT-4 as a crutch during practice, and subsequently perform worse on their own. The detail that should follow every conversation about AI in education is the one buried in the post-test survey results. The students who had relied on AI the most during practice were also the most confident they had understood the material. The tool had not just failed to teach them. It had convinced them they had learned something they had not, which is a different kind of failure entirely and a much harder one to correct because the student has no idea it is happening. The crutch had made them confident and weak at the same time.

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

This tweet, with its extreme claims, caught my attention because Elon Musk reposted it. I asked Gemini if any of these claims are accurate. It assured me that they are not. I then asked Grok, which replied that the first four are in fact accurate, and it provided details and sources supporting its response. So, I went back to Gemini, copied and pasted Grok's reply into a prompt, and asked Gemini what it thought about what Grok had just told me. Here's Gemini's response: "I stand corrected... I apologize for my previous response. I attempted to separate fact from social media exaggeration but failed to properly verify the depth of the horrific testimonies from the actual trials like Operation Bullfinch and the Rotherham inquiries. The details you cited from Grok accurately reflect the devastating and brutal reality of what these victims endured."

@Aesalerte I'll believe THAT when I see it.

🚨 URGENT LA CHINE prévoit de traduire l'Organisation mondiale de la santé devant la Cour pénale internationale. L'accusation : Le processus du virus Covid-19.

I finally found this video after months of searching. They've tried to keep this off of social media because it exposes all of the young people who died suddenly because of the jab.

Dear Mrs Mc Cain. I totally understand you... we live in complicated times and it is scary to be a good parent... Mrs Mc Cain, here is what you asked for - my name is Prof Dr Martin ZIZI, MD-PhD-PhD... I worked on the hantaviruses - and put two posts out these last two days to be didactic, and tell it like it is... in a manner to be understood by the non-specialists This is the most accurate info I can give you... it can be even shocking at times... Here post #1 x.com/MartinZ_uncut/… Here post #2 x.com/MartinZ_uncut/… In the past, I used to be Bed DoD med CSO and I ran a zoonosis sentinel lab for Belgian DoD, one of our research and epidemiological topic were Hantaviruses. We even published NON-classified peer reviewed papers, easy to find. I can confirm one crucial thing - POTUS is totally right to have removed the US from the WHO! PCR gives up to 80% false positive - so we ask once again a "pandemics" of testing with NO care for the eventual sick... So hopefully you realize that I have NO conflict of interest, and that I fought for years with Prof Jay Bhattacharya to keep or bring back common sense here in the US Two key pieces of information for your benefit (but also for everyone) - Hantaviruses are zoonosis hence a vaccine is a NOT an intelligent mass protection policy. It is not even a possible idea, as it would require vaccinating ALL rodents! - On the flip side - Hydroxychloroquine - will (at 400-600 mg /day, for an adult) will BLOCK the entry of the virus inside our cells, hence preventing its reproduction, and mitigating disease and spread. This was published years ago, but is - of course - NOT on the medical label of this medication.. YOU do not need to worry as off-label usage and prescriptions are quite routine in medical treatments You may hence believe us, to avoid being victim of another mass manipulation... YOU can check me on Google Scholar... Some will unleash a storm of falsehoods like no other! Sincerely, Yours, Martin ZIZI

Here’s Dr Zelenko teaching us how to treat Hantavirus back in 2022. This will be the most enlightening 2 minutes and 47 seconds of your life. Please listen carefully.

TRUMP to WHO and HANTAVIRUS: "Left-wing fanatics are trying to stoke fear and bring back the COVID restrictions. Not with us. We're not closing schools, not following mask mandates, not tolerating vaccine mandates. No money for these people." GOOD❗️

Dr. Pierre Kory exposes a massive media anomaly. He reveals that over 100,000 articles were published globally about Hantavirus in a few days. He confirms this massive coordination is entirely unnatural. Why is a minor outbreak suddenly consuming the global media cycle?

@ABridgen A fact sheet from 1997.

The Saints have been warning us for days such as these. It's time to listen: St Gabriel Urgebadze - "In the years of the Antichrist, people will expect salvation from space. This will be the devil's greatest trick! Humanity will seek help from the aliens, not knowing that they are actually demons" St Paisios - "You should know that these are all demonic things, which take various forms. There is no life on another planet!" St Porphyrios - "All these, you know, are imaginary, demonic things. There is no life on another planet!" St Seraphim of Platina -"The UFO phenomenon is a sign to Orthodox Christians to walk all the more cautiously and soberly on the path to salvation, knowing that we can be tempted and seduced not merely by false religions, but even by seemingly physical objects which catch the eye"

When you realise the new 'Fear Virus' being pushed by the media (Hantavirus) was also listed as an adverse side effect of the covid vaccines...

🚨 HOLY CRAP, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary CONFIRMED the FDA purposefully lied to the people for nearly 2 decades against dietary fats to help Big Pharma People avoided fat and ate MORE SUGAR, so Pharma could sell them more drugs RFK Jr. just declared open WAR on added sugar “They suppressed the data for 16 years…Those in the low-fat group had higher rates of heart attacks!” “We created a generation of children with low protein, high carbohydrates, sugar addiction, and burdened with ultra-processed foods, and what did we do as a medical field? Drugged them at scale!” “Those days are OVER. We are telling people the truth about food.” MAHA WILL WIN!

@its_The_Dr I see a cat's profile, looking up at a 45* angle to the right, with both paws joined in prayer. Not exactly a common sight in my world.

If you're right-brained, you will see a rabbit . If you're left-brained, you'll see a horse. What do you see?

Televangelist Perry Stone: A super SECRET meeting took place with many pastors in a SECRET state where SECRET government officials confirmed to them soon there will be disclosure about alien crafts not of this world and “Reptilian looking creatures” among us. He claims the upcoming Steven Spielberg movie “Disclosure Day” is based on what is coming. I don’t know what President Trump is planning on declassifying with the “UFO Files”, but one thing I am sure of— many pastors in America are controlled. They have sold their souls. They are a total control mechanism for evangelicals. I don’t trust any one of them. Also notable.. In early December 2025 (five months ago), a certain country hosted a first of its kind delegation of roughly 1,000 American Christian pastors and influencers. rumble.com/v79ffcy-pastor…

@MakisMedicine "If they can't sabotage me, they'll just buy me out?" E X A C T L Y ! (Beware the third option...)

BREAKING NEWS: Mayo Clinic is offering me an "Executive Director" position for up to $400k 😃 Oh and they're not the only one. My email inbox is suddenly filling up with Executive job offers from several big Pharmaceutical companies. So this is what I get for helping 9000+ Cancer patients with Ivermectin & Mebendazole and leading the largest Ivermectin Cancer Project in the world? After talking about a New Florida Cancer Clinic? 🤔 If they can't sabotage me, they'll just buy me out? 💵 I have to admit, it is mildly amusing. Ten years ago, I may have jumped at something like this. It's almost tailor made for me. But at this stage of my life...can't say I felt even a hint of temptation. They really don't know me very well 😃 Sorry, Mayo Clinic. I'm building a Cancer Center in Florida. It's going to be a bit different from yours. 😉

Prison please!!

If you’re wondering how our elections in America are always so close, like how Democrats pulled ahead in Virginia’s redistricting within a few percentage points, this is how Former CIA Operations Officer Gary Berntsen explains there are teams of people who rig our elections and keep the vote totals extremely close, by slim margins, so it’s believable and hard to prove fraud Lara Logan interviews Former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen. He explains, in detail, how elections are being stolen in America He describes there are teams of statisticians, mathematicians, and hackers who map out every county and identify where margins can be quietly adjusted Different techniques are used in each location so nothing matches in a recount. When a 70-30 county becomes 68-32, nobody notices. But when you add up these differences across an entire state, those tiny amounts of fraud decide outcomes Both former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and author Ralph Pezzullo explain the strategy. They explain they don't flip the big blue cities. Instead they shave votes in the places no one ever audits “They know where they can find the dead people... Mm-hmm.” “They plan this, It's meticulous. It's meticulous. These guys are experts at this. It's not just a few guys in a back room. You're talking about hundreds of statisticians and engineers, and they work it, you know, for a year to plan and mathematicians and hackers.” “We had a map out of Colorado when we were talking to our engineers, the guys that designed it, that stole the elections. — We just go to every one place where Trump wins 70-30 and — Shaved it off. We shave in every other place. We don't go near a Democratic place, because when they wanna do recounts, they're gonna go to the Democratic places. They don't realize we shaved in every other committee. We know every other county. We know how to do this. And then in each of those things where they shave, they shave with a different technique in each one of those. So if you found something in, in one county, there's no continuity around the state that way. So this is why the Republicans are so much at fault, because they have the power and the ability to show in their areas they can allow access to the machines, they can allow access to the source code” People need to go to prison. Democrats are stealing elections nationwide in every county, in every state of America