AlexThinker

11K posts

AlexThinker

AlexThinker

@cn_iter

San Francisco, CA Entrou em Eylül 2016
244 Seguindo592 Seguidores
杰尼龟
杰尼龟@shishi_2000·
网传碧桂园选妃事件,真是上流社会做下流事
中文
516
243
4.4K
1.3M
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@Suozhang_NY 911。把你想对美国政府讲的话,直接对着电话讲。不用担心语言问题,里面有在线中文翻译。
中文
0
0
0
42
所长 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈
走线烧饼唐这些天由支那公众号、外宣号有组织正面宣传,且参选洛杉矶市长,这位可以直接定格为支共海外代理人!本届川普政府最失败之处是该打击的不打击,该遣返的不遣返,留一堆丁胖子金牌讲师、唐某这类盲流豁豁美利坚,而赶走了那些对美国未来真正有帮助的人群!
夏一旦同学@Danyixia

中国小伙为美国民众发放免费酱饼,得到美国民众的喜爱。

中文
10
4
22
2.7K
幸存
幸存@JY8964·
@Suozhang_NY 这种傻逼玩意为什么不被川普铁拳呢?还有那个神马讲师!
中文
2
0
1
130
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@Stanleysobest 记住大概数字。一吨100元约1亿人民币。一吨约100万张纸钞。
中文
0
0
0
183
Stanley
Stanley@Stanleysobest·
hr面试出这题为难人,求 高人指点, 在线等答案…… 挺急的!
Stanley tweet media
中文
286
2
335
379.3K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@aeon0wang @ztaiztai @shishi_2000 观念问题咯。就如同几十年前,吃顿肯德基,会被小粉红扣上“汉奸”的帽子,吃一顿肯德基给美国贡献多少侵略未来中国的子弹。又好比古时候男女授受不亲,女人的胳膊被男人看见后,就要嫁给男人。您看现在,即使屁股被看见了,也没什么事。即使同居打胎了,也没什么事。这才几年,整个社会观念发生了改变。
中文
1
0
0
96
xiao ming
xiao ming@aeon0wang·
@cn_iter @ztaiztai @shishi_2000 不是男女做爱,而是太随意了,就跟动物一样,人生为智慧生物,比低等生物还追求本能毫无节制,完全无视各种契约精神,纯粹交配而交配,所谓大洪水也是比方,灾难也是各种混乱后人自己招来的,你根本看不到背后所带来的社会混乱,没有规则,你总有一天会受到重锤
中文
1
0
0
28
杰尼龟
杰尼龟@shishi_2000·
@cn_iter 您可以增加点智慧吗,有没有可能这段文案是我复制的热评发的,看您反应这么大,我不得不怀疑,这里面的某位女士是不是您的亲戚或者直系亲属,我可能冒犯到您了,在这里跟您道歉,说实话我也挺想加入这种活动的,您如果有渠道可以引荐一下,我也不在乎什么上流社会下流事的
中文
0
0
1
29
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@liusw10 @Alex8282019 会把顾客与老板的矛盾,变成顾客与服务员的矛盾。服务员服务了顾客,两者建立了良好关系。但是不合理的收费方式,是老板制定的。顾客犯不着与服务员争吵。
中文
0
0
1
1.9K
neek
neek@liusw10·
@Alex8282019 如果不给第二次的15%小费,会有什么后果?
中文
11
0
2
33.9K
二爷Alex
二爷Alex@Alex8282019·
有些华人餐馆太无耻了。今天在“山城辣妹子火锅”吃饭,我结账的时候发现,它在送来确认的账单上强制加入了15%的小费——改叫服务费,强制也就算了,更逆天的是,在刷完卡后,在送来签字确认的账单上,它居然又堂而皇之的收最低15%的小费!而且数额还是在上一个确认账单全额的情况下的15%! 也就是说,它在强制收15%小费的基础上,再全额乘以15%小费。连收两次小费。我是真的没有见过如此无耻的店家。
中文
473
19
1K
324.1K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@aeon0wang @ztaiztai @shishi_2000 男女一起做个爱,怎么让您生出如此大的恨意。欲人上帝拿大洪水把所有人都淹死。我没太理解,“做爱”与“让大洪水把人淹死”哪个更邪恶。
中文
1
0
0
31
xiao ming
xiao ming@aeon0wang·
@ztaiztai @shishi_2000 不是洗净,是像上帝那样发大洪水,更有可能是世界大战,大破才大立,偏离基准线越多,振幅越大,崩溃速度越快
中文
2
0
0
34
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@shishi_2000 ”真是上流社会做下流事”。从这句话感受到了您的酸。似乎上流人应该做您心目中圣人的事情。有没有可能,您这么多年塑造的的文化内核,本身就是错的。被人编写成的。用您能理解的话来说,就是您的思维模式,是被别人塑造出来的,不是您自己悟出来的。您的大脑其实受控于其他人,且您不自知。
中文
1
0
0
41
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@shishi_2000 男人喜欢女人,并不下流。有没有可能,您从小接受的文化教育有问题。他下流,让他继续下流下去,为什么感觉到您挺着急的。
中文
2
0
4
16.4K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@shishi_2000 问题在于,人家自己甘愿下流。您一个八杆子打不着的人,却似乎显得有点着急。这视频是您能看到的,还有很多比这刺激100倍,您看不到的,该怎么说呢。
中文
1
0
1
270
杰尼龟
杰尼龟@shishi_2000·
@cn_iter 我明白您的意思,因为您或者您的原生家庭可能从小都和这种环境有过接触,又或者是身处这种环境里,这是我文化程度涉及不到的,所以我觉得您说的没有问题
中文
1
0
3
415
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@shishi_2000 不是。有什么问题吗?下流的男人与下流的女人一起玩些下流的游戏。您有什么意见吗?
中文
2
0
0
441
杰尼龟
杰尼龟@shishi_2000·
@cn_iter 确实不敢苟同您的见解,男人喜欢女人确实不是下流,但是一个男人陪着很多女人一起下流,那就不止是下流问题了,您懂吗
中文
1
0
9
12.4K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@Eden_CSD @Lgreezx @shishi_2000 我来回答。通过官商勾结,从老百姓身上搜刮来的。不过呢,老百姓是支持国家的任何决策的。就比如建国后的各种运动,整死那么多老百姓,老百姓不也傻呵呵的只恨日本人么。遇到任何不公的事情,只要把国家在下一盘大棋的叙事搬出来,都能让老百姓闭嘴。毕竟老百姓只敢恨贪官,从来不敢恨皇上。
中文
0
0
0
44
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@chidunews @williamlab 也不是这样啦。这个和圈子有关系。越是底层,越是没自信的人,喜欢排挤同类。我接触到的人,基本都是相互尊重、帮持、资源互换。也基本没遇到过互踩的情况。所以我很纳闷twitter上为什么老有人说,被同胞坑了。有没有可能,自身属于被坑体质。如同算命里面的“身弱”,容易沾染不好的事情。
中文
1
0
16
3K
尺度新闻观察
尺度新闻观察@chidunews·
@williamlab 真的假的,不是都是印度人抱团排挤外人吗?中国人在一起就是互相背后捅刀子?现在刀口向外啦?
中文
5
0
186
22.1K
陳威廉
陳威廉@williamlab·
硅谷员工疯狂吐槽团队里几乎全是中国人,哈哈哈哈哈他写的太好笑了。 鸠占鹊巢了属于是。
陳威廉 tweet media陳威廉 tweet media
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

中文
194
98
927
603.9K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@rongrong0509 trump及maga们的本意是,硅谷高科技公司的优质岗位,该由本土人担任。可实际情况是,这些高科技如此快的成长,本身源自内外专家学者极客们的共同努力才发展出来的。trump想法,与习近平类似。比如台湾的台积电,习近平与小粉红们的想法,应该由爱国粉红们掌控。硅谷企业也应该由maga掌控。maga=小粉红
中文
0
0
1
321
LexAuric
LexAuric@rongrong0509·
绿卡申请者必须离境等?川普的“堵漏”实为“断路” 川普政府最新移民政策:想拿绿卡?先滚出美国,回老家等着。官方说法是“堵上法律漏洞”。可这“漏洞”就像大选时喊的“不查身份证”一样,纯属欲盖弥彰。真实目的只有一个——堵死移民通道,让合法移民也进不来。 先看庇护移民。他们本就是因政治迫害、战乱无法在母国生存才逃来美国。现在让他们“回国等待”,等于告诉他们:你能安全回去,说明你不需要庇护;你若不敢回去,就是违反移民法,直接遣返。这哪是堵漏,这是断桥。桥断了,对岸的人只能淹死。 再看雇佣移民(EB类)。这是美国最需要的群体——硅谷的工程师、实验室的科学家、医院的医生。他们能在美国工作,是因为已有雇主担保。让他们“离境等待”,等于让他们丢了工作。丢了工作,绿卡资格自动丧失。川普这是帮美国“清理”人才,把顶尖大脑往外赶。加拿大、德国、澳大利亚正举着欢迎牌,等着接收这些被美国踢出去的精英。 家属移民、投资移民本就大多在境外等,新政策对它们影响不大。但川普团队故意把所有类别混为一谈,给公众一个印象:“所有移民都在插队”。这是赤裸裸的欺骗。 MAGA运动本质是反移民,不分合法非法,不分高端低端。只要不是“自己人”,就统统是“敌人”。甚至肤色都不是标准——你看他们骂欧洲白左时,可没因为对方是白人嘴下留情。恨的是立场,不是颜色。 为什么选这个时间点推新政?因为伊朗战争打成泥潭,访华没讨到便宜,内政外交乏善可陈。于是又祭出老剧本——打移民牌,稳住基本盘。川粉们对“移民滚出去”永远买账,哪怕这政策会掏空美国科技创新、瘫痪医疗体系、让硅谷变成空壳。 可悲的是,美国本土蓝领工人不会因此多一个岗位,因为那些被驱逐的高端人才留下的空缺,美国人补不上。没有印度工程师,苹果代码谁写?没有中国博士,实验室谁管?没有外国护士,乡村医院谁开门?川普的“断路”政策,最终断的是美国自己的血管。 至于那些欢呼的MAGA,他们很快就会看到后果——物价更贵、看病更难、科技公司搬走、房价不降反升。因为他们不知道,美国之所以强大,正是因为全世界的人才愿意来。现在门关上了,人才会去别家。美国剩下的,只有一群相信自己赢了的人,和一间被自己拆空了的大房子。
中文
13
22
71
6.1K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@BTC99M 女孩子也想做爱。钱只是一个借口。给足钱,她会说缺自由,缺生命力,缺理解。总之编一堆理由,以达到做爱的目的。
中文
0
1
6
2.6K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@jackkkkkcool @whyyoutouzhele 是取消户籍方面,关于农村人缴纳社保少的问题。翻译过来就是,要求农村户籍,在缴纳社保方面,与城里人统一标准。但是领取时,按照农村当地收入水平领取。核心一句话,扩大从老百姓身上吸血的范围。
中文
0
1
9
621
李老师不是你老师
李老师不是你老师@whyyoutouzhele·
5月22日,中国国务院发布指导意见,要求各城市保障公民无论户籍身份如何,都能公平享有公共服务,并全面取消社保户籍限制。不过北京上海等大城市如何落实仍未知。
李老师不是你老师 tweet media
中文
201
49
926
295.7K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@guoyuan6 @MianMaoKu 普京、希特勒、习近平、trump,一路货色。典型的民族主义者。都在幻想给自己这个国家或人种,一个牛逼的未来。事实结果大概率会朝反方向发展。
中文
0
0
3
163
Dax
Dax@guoyuan6·
@MianMaoKu 😂美国公民自己人也抓进去。疯了吧。
中文
2
0
0
289
MMK
MMK@MianMaoKu·
先搞无证的,再搞有证的,然后搞绿卡,然后搞归化公民,最后就是搞持不同政见的美国人。#熟悉的配方
中文
11
2
78
6.2K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@dennisottawa 您最好庆幸有这些反贼的存在。当某天反贼们放弃道德幻想后,他们会比目前中共里面蝇营狗苟之辈,更没底线。这些人回去,也不会是那些乖乖种地的屁民。吃你们这伙人最狠的,或许会是这些放弃道德包袱的反贼。
中文
3
0
4
473
枫叶留声机
枫叶留声机@dennisottawa·
现在不晓得国土安全部宣布的政策是否包括政治庇护。假如包括的话那就好玩儿了。 华川粉反贼全部被赶回中国,先回去坐牢,这样才能证明确实受到政治迫害。在牢里等待美国的绿卡,最好争取多判几年,否则出狱了还都去不了美国🤣🤣
中文
16
4
104
7.7K
AlexThinker
AlexThinker@cn_iter·
@calibillionare 其实我是支持给反共人士发枪这个策略。同时建议再赠送一些自杀式无人机或远程导弹。这样会更省时间。
中文
0
0
0
71
加州大富翁
加州大富翁@calibillionare·
我觉得这还不够,核心是大量虚假政治庇护诉求淹没了移民局的资源。美国在政治庇护方面应避免庇护申请者处于经济目的来美国,也就是如果在人均收入较为发达国家受到迫害,例如在英国因言论获罪,那么可以在美国申请政治庇护。如果像中国这样的人均收入欠发达国家,应该去同等水平或者经济更差一些的国家去申请庇护,我相信有不少国家愿意接收邓海燕们这样的能人。 还有庇护属于特权,绿卡也属于特权,入籍公民也属于特权,美国政府清查造假的庇护通过者取消其绿卡,例如返回母国这种行为 ,并对其处以浪费国家资源的罚金,之后驱逐出境,这也是common sense。 同时对于小丑式的口头反共群体,美国政府应给他们一人发一把AK47,200发弹药,一身防弹衣和头盔,送到中国国境线旁,我相信依靠这百万大军,让中共下台并非难事,呆在美国反什么共,去前线反共才对。
Homeland Security@DHSgov

An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes. The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over.

中文
18
1
36
3.6K