Richard Franks

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia Proverbs 30:5-6 the word of God is pure and if you add to it you're a liar.

@RickAFranks @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia None of those verses say that.

I’ve had 10,000 Christians tell me I’m not a Christian today. And not one of them has invited me to their church. You guys are terrible at missionary work.

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia Deuteronomy 12:32 do not add or take away from...

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia Deuteronomy 4:2 another clear and direct command not to add or take away from any of the writings or prophecy in that book.

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia Joe Smith dreamed up were called.

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia Galations 1: 8-9 states that if we or an angel or any man preach a different or other gospel he be accursed... So that's pretty clear that any other stories or ideas about Jesus and such are gonna be lies. Specifically "angels" like macaroni or bologna or whatever the demons who

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia So...you are illiterate? Rev 22:18 and 19 specifically says no man can add to or take away from the prophecy in the book (specifically referred Revelations itself is the common understanding) so no new prophecy about end times or judgment etc, all the things John covered there.

@_Tony_Tonez_ race" verse anywhere. So why is that super strange, easily refuted claim so important that every Catholic knows it and says it? Why?

@_Tony_Tonez_ So if it's not true, why push that claim? That's what I don't get. There's no "need" for the claim. There's no call for it in any scripture anywhere. There's no "I will literally pass my authority by word of mouth and secret handshake thru the generations like a baton in a relay

@abcquertybro @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia So ...?

@RickAFranks @HilltopAutoServ @FiredUpCoug @auroradelpia "if it's not in the bible it's wrong" where does it say that in the bible?

@_Tony_Tonez_ That's completely unrelated to the question and not at all in dispute. You claim a direct unbroken line of authority passed from the literal apostles to each and every bishop today. That's not true. That one thing. That one thing I keep asking about. Just that one.

@RickAFranks You are a for real clown bot. The church records say that we have a church built where Christ was crucified and a church built where Peter died. Now that is continuity, bro.

@_Tony_Tonez_ own church records of the schism disprove it. You all just get angry. It's like you can't step back and go "well shit, all of this other stuff makes sense and checks out but this one part is wrong." Without thinking it's denying the entire thing and destroying the church.

@_Tony_Tonez_ your church. I'm asking about the one little thing that never made sense. That's it. But no one can ever answer it. I don't know why. You all just get angry and talk about 31 other things and no one will ever address the unbroken chain of authority claim. When I point out your

@_Tony_Tonez_ None of the other stuff you're saying about tradition or your heritage or a building or anything else has anything at all to do with what I am asking you. And I keep consistently asking the same thing over and over and you keep saying all sorts of disconnected and unrelated stuff

@_Tony_Tonez_ historical documents say there was no single leader in any of the Holy Sees for the first several hundred years and your own church documents the schism in which people were appointed by heretics but retained their positions as part of political negotiation. That's it. That's all

@_Tony_Tonez_ What are you even talking about? Lol. I just keep asking the same simple question and you will not answer it. It's crazy.

@RickAFranks Do you cry when you see a crucifix? You sound like a spoiled brat child little cry baby

@_Tony_Tonez_ was a kid and no one has ever been able to answer it. Not nuns or priests or even Cardinal of the Philadelphia arch diocese Anthony Bevilacqua. Why not?

@_Tony_Tonez_ power and continued to serve as part of the political deal that ended the schism. That disproves the unbroken line. It's your own church's history. So why keep saying the unbroken line thing when your own records disprove it? That's all I want to know. Been asking this since I