Cyrus

951 posts

Cyrus

Cyrus

@FlopperKev7

curious monkey

Sumali Aralık 2013
131 Sinusundan29 Mga Tagasunod
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@dccommonsense @BrianDBowers @idiotboy1999 @ExcelFrozeOver Love you Dan, but if you discharge your emotion that you feel for Trump and objectively go over the information you were just shown, I think it’s very clear what’s going on. This whole “show me evidence” defense when it was just explained to you why that’s not possible is silly.
English
2
0
1
68
Dan Carlin
Dan Carlin@dccommonsense·
@BrianDBowers @idiotboy1999 @ExcelFrozeOver Again, there are massively powerful who would like this to be true. They have virtually unlimited funds. Can hire the finest lawyers and researchers. They may even have sway over a few SCOTUS members. But with all this evidence we get...nothing?
English
3
0
29
584
Dan Carlin
Dan Carlin@dccommonsense·
Trump's constant crowing about election "rigging" is his "Big Lie". He says he doesn't need proof...he can just see it. Now he "sees" it in California."Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". And we've seen none. It's conspiracy theory stuff.
English
121
131
2.2K
63.1K
Cyrus nag-retweet
Brad Helms
Brad Helms@idiotboy1999·
Like most Americans, I don’t care a bit about 2020. Biden won. I *do* care greatly about the LA Mayor’s race. Solid statistical analysis *is* proof, Dan. Maybe not in a court of law, but certainly proof enough to treat in good faith the concerns of millions of Angelenos and Californians. Dan, respectfully…how do you prove actual voting fraud in California, specifically in the current Los Angeles mayor’s race? It is functionally impossible unless the person committing the fraud essentially outs themselves or you have undercover folks embedded with the fraudsters. There’s no chain of custody, voter rolls are never cleaned, the signature verification process on mail-in ballots is a joke (standard is 40% similar, and it takes 3 unanimous people to reject in close cases, and then there’s the whole absurd “if you are incapable of signing” process), etc. It’s actually in the California Code that a ballot identification envelope with no dated postmark (or an illegible one) and no private mail service date stamp will be counted if (1) the voter has dated the envelope (or it otherwise indicates the ballot was executed on or before Election Day) and (2) the ballot arrives by the 7-day post-election receipt deadline. Combine that with the insanely lax signature verification rules, and the statutory legality of “harvesting” operations and you end up with something like less than 1% of mail-in ballots being rejected despite millions coming in after Election Day. The opportunities for fraud in California elections are so obvious that you almost have to giggle at the idiocy. Literally no other Western democracy has anything like what California does. None. You live in a one-party city in a one-party state. The biggest donor to that party in California and LA are public employee unions, whose employees are the ones who work the vote counting process. You’re a history guru - what was it that Stalin is purported to have said about voting? I think one has to be naive, willfully ignorant or simply innumerate to look at what’s happening with mail-in ballots in this race and not have some pretty serious suspicions. Even if we want to be generous and assume that everything in LA is squeaky clean, one could not design an election process more likely to create doubt about election integrity. When people lose faith in the fidelity of elections, things everywhere start falling apart. You can’t reasonably pin LA’s issues on Trump.
English
2
1
6
655
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@jk_rowling P.s p.s You made my childhood so much more alive, being a 1997 baby the movies and books worked wonders on my imagination and my mom ran out of punishments sometimes and would have to resort to taking away my HP books. I hope to stand on your shoulders one day. Thankyou mam🫡♥️
English
0
0
0
159
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@jk_rowling @jk_rowling I beg that you stop giving attention to this subject. I am in agreeance with you, but the fact that you give your energy so often to speak on this makes it seem like those people got to you years back in the whole debacle. You are better than that to have to stoop.
English
5
0
1
2K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Yes, period huts are back. Because girls just aren’t embarrassed and awkward enough about menstruation. But what happens when the trans-identified boy feels excluded from the period hut? What if he feels less of a girl? Perhaps it would be easier just to tell girls to stay home.
Sonia Sodha@soniasodha

‘Unisex toilets outside the main toilet area for menstruating girls.’ In a British school in 2026. This is where ‘be kind’ policies have got us.

English
526
4.3K
29.5K
1M
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@jk_rowling Also yes I know agreeance is not a real word but it should be and I’ll continue to use it lol. And you occasionally should poke fun at the absurdity but this specific topic you too often comment about and it seems like it’s on your mind allot which it shouldn’t be.
English
0
0
0
150
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@paolini You there! Did you say nè to that old woman?
HT
0
0
0
18
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@paolini We are the knights who say “nè”
HT
1
0
4
143
Cyrus nag-retweet
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
As of the time of this post, almost no one is watching this video. I found that very odd, after being alerted that it exists. It seems to understand what I am talking about. Yet, I still have no idea who made it. If you made this, please identify. Thx. youtu.be/OWPVjHhQqHs?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
180
481
3.1K
467K
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@dccommonsense I don’t think he really wanted war with the US. There are allot of things in the mainstream narrative of both world wars that are sneaky and not as straight forward as the allied powers made it seem. Just like in WW1 Germany didn’t want war and neither did the American public.
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Dan Carlin
Dan Carlin@dccommonsense·
When Hitler was given estimates of U.S. production capability the Nazis laughed at what they thought were ridiculous inflated fantasies.They turned out to be UNDERestimates.Look at these factories.He probably shouldn't have declared war on the U.S..Just another Hitlerian blunder.
U.S. Naval Institute@NavalInstitute

#OTD in 1940, the Vought F4U Corsair flew for the first time. In 1943, the Corsair and F6F Hellcat (AKA the "Terrible Twins") destroyed 5 enemy planes for every U.S. plane lost. This 1944 photo is of factory-fresh Corsairs and Hellcats being prepared to be shipped to the Pacific.

English
56
68
1.6K
164.6K
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
I will do my best to ingrain your messages and pass on your god given talents to the younger generations. You did a great job sir, thankyou!💪♥️ #jordanpeterson
English
0
0
0
18
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
One of my favorite intellectuals @jordanbpeterson is very sick and I hope everyone can put him in your thoughts and prayers. I love the way he speaks and dives into philosophy but it’s been evident for the last year or two that he has lost his spunk and vigor.
English
2
0
0
13
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
He used to be much more clear concise animated and powerful in his messages. By the time the Peterson academy came around last year it was too late, in those lessons he is a shadow of himself and seems hollowed out and his thinking obscured and scattered. It happens to us all.
English
0
0
0
12
Cyrus nag-retweet
MAHA Action
MAHA Action@MAHA_Action·
RFK Jr. reveals FDA officials admitted they literally do not know how many chemicals are in the American food supply. “When I came in, I asked FDA, ‘How many chemicals are in our food?’” “They said, ‘We don’t know.’” “‘We don’t have a list of them.’” “It’s somewhere between 4,000 and 12,000.” “In Europe, they only have 400 chemicals in their food.” “The 9,600 extra ones that we have are all illegal there.”
English
753
11K
29.2K
658K
Cyrus nag-retweet
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Read this book and give it to all your friends. Survival of civilization depends on it!
Gad Saad@GadSaad

#2 across all new releases in Canada.

English
7.9K
34.5K
178.3K
38.9M
Cyrus nag-retweet
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
This is indefensible: Spraying glyphosate over wild lands is ecocide, and toxic to humans, of course. But there is one upside: It allows us to see the full corruption of our system, which pretends to be preoccupied with our health, even as it poisons the world behind our backs.
Massimo@Rainmaker1973

The U.S. Forest Service is spraying glyphosate (Roundup) across tens of thousands of acres of national forests this spring to support commercial timber production. Following wildfires, forests naturally regenerate with diverse shrubs, wildflowers, and wildlife. However, a recent investigation reveals that the Forest Service and private logging companies are routinely applying the herbicide to eliminate competing native vegetation, favoring commercially valuable species such as Douglas fir and sugar pine. This practice has created large areas with significantly reduced biodiversity, often described as "dead zones", where insect, bird, and plant populations have sharply declined. Glyphosate, classified by the World Health Organization as a probable human carcinogen, has seen its use in California national forests quintuple over the past two decades, reaching a record 266,000 pounds in 2023. Local communities, environmental groups, and residents are raising concerns about potential impacts on water quality, endangered species (including salmon and rare foxes), and public health. Critics argue that prioritizing industrial timber production over ecological diversity conflicts with the broader mission of national forests as public lands. The issue has intensified debates over forest management, balancing economic interests with long-term environmental and community health.

English
586
7.3K
22.6K
831.4K
Cyrus nag-retweet
Jay Henry
Jay Henry@jay_h3nry·
LOOK CLOSER. The scale is set to 185 before Khamzat Chimaev steps on. Bar goes up. Calls 185. He steps off. The commission never moves it off 185 when he walks away and Khamzat steps back on. The bar is stuck to the top #UFC328 #MMATwitter
English
325
304
5.8K
2.4M
Cyrus nag-retweet
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Hitler was a socialist, therefore all socialists are Hitler
English
41.4K
74.3K
648.8K
111.1M
Cyrus nag-retweet
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has just BANNED AI data centers from using up all the water needed by citizens during a drought And the law BANS utility companies from charging higher prices because of data centers "How are you going to say that somehow the water can go to a data center when we need to water for our own people and for the core functions of our society?"
English
922
7.4K
28.5K
564.6K
Cyrus
Cyrus@FlopperKev7·
@Cyvertray @paolini What is a formal “you”? In English if he is talking to Arya referring to her as “you” in a sentence there is no formal version of that word in English so it’s casual and neutral in use.
English
1
0
0
36
𝙲𝚢𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚢📯
@paolini I got a question for you, something that, as a german, having read your books in german, i have always wondered. Is Eragon using the informal "you" when speaking to Arya or Nasuada or the formal one?
English
3
0
3
444