Travis Riecks

@DocStrangelove2 You look ready.

@TheMindjacked @L6_Underground Can't imagine the horrors that would ensue if linked ammunition separated from each other durring cycling.

@L6_Underground Why is it printed so hastily and with as few layer lines as possible? This shits gonna delaminate

What the hell is this

@HardPass4 Coulter principle?

I haven’t heard much more about that shooting at the mosque yesterday…wonder why that is

@jondelarroz To be fair. He did a fantastic job as Oberyn Martell, and season one of the Mandalorian. That was before they tried to put him in everything.

Do you have Pedro Pascal fatigue?

@BecomingCritter The bigger concern is that you insist she get a seat at the thanksgiving table.

why when i have sex with a petite blonde it’s a type but apparently it’s a “fetish” when she’s a blowup doll

@jerrycurld That ejection pattern makes me feel funny in the pants area.

They tell me post groups of my decent round count PSA krink.. it’s a 8.5” 556, anything 5moa or less is a win imo I didn’t buy this for groups, I bought it to abuse and mag dump into trash

@Nap51M Not sure if top-tier rage-bait or actually retarded.

No semi auto AR based rifle is sub minute. Additionally, there is no situation in which you need a sub minute semi auto rifle in any military application. The average human does become 1 moa wide until you hit 1 mile and you don't shoot even at 1 mile with .308 Winchester.

@RepJackKimble Take notes kids. This is proper trolling.

Just a friendly warning. We don’t even make $200k per year in Congress despite working nearly 140 days. If we aren’t properly compensated, a lot of us will go to the private sector and you will be left with some real idiots in Congress.

@StationCommandr @Fat_Electrician Agreed. But, what percentage of NASA are Astronauts?

@Mebe1001 @Fat_Electrician Hehe. Women throw themselves at astronauts. They've admitted it.

Unpopular opinion: this is correct. Fighting & fucking. Almost every major technological advancement in human history can be traced back to one of two motivations: A. Kill the enemy B. Put the wife in a good mood Humanity didn’t invent faster ships, stronger metals, or the internet because we’re enlightened scholars. We did it because some dude either wanted to win a war, or get laid.

@guildelin @Fat_Electrician Valid. I concede my point.

@Mebe1001 @Fat_Electrician Counter point... we want space program to fight and fuck aliens

@Zoma3mk An underbarrel m249

“You get an AK-47 with unlimited budget for attachments. What are you putting on it?”

@WhatAreYouDrunk @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician Have not. Is it worth a watch?

@Mebe1001 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician Ever watch "The Day the Universe Changed"?

@WhatAreYouDrunk @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician It can also be traced back to the Great Famine of 1315–1317, as well as Martin Luther.....neither of which produced much sex or war. "Can be traced to" doesn't mean what you think it means.

@Mebe1001 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician "...can be traced back to..." So he is correct.

Not disagreeing with that. I'm asking you to tell me where I said fire doesn't allow more sexual access. Spoiler alert, you can't, because I didn't. You're literally arguing against a point I didn't make... To be clear, because you seem to be struggling with this, I am saying (focus now) your rationale supposes (this means that you assume, and you expect everyone else to assume the same thing) that the chronological advances in technology exist in a straight line, without forks, meaning all post-Prometheus events must share the same explanation and justification. This is an inherently flawed and remedial understanding of how science and engineering advance. This exists separately from my previous assertion, which you have not addressed. I do appreciate that you have noticed my girth, though.

@Mebe1001 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician You really are thick. Fire make woman happier. Man with fire more better for woman. Woman close by easier to fuck, woman far away harder. Fire about fucking.

@Fluffy_product @Fat_Electrician The means to build a rocket ship would be the attractor, not the ability.

@Mebe1001 @Fat_Electrician Bro I’m 95% sure if i built a rocket it’d help me get laid

@Charles61592281 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician Please tell me where I said women stayed away from the warmth and safety of the fire. You might try a little harder.

@Mebe1001 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician "If we were to follow your chain of reasoning, then everything goes back to man's discovery of fire, which was first used to cook and stay warm..." Please tell me how women stayed away from the warmth and safety of the fire. You are trying too hard.

The moment NASA forked off, its mission statement changed. We can separate NASA's Apollo program from the military minuteman program, because the budgetary commity did. As much fun as it is to lump everything technologically similar into a singular pool, and use that to ascribe intent, the reality of the situation is always more complicated. If we were to follow your chain of reasoning, then everything goes back to man's discovery of fire, which was first used to cook and stay warm....ergo all science and technology is solely about cooking food and staying warm. While most things, throughout most of human history are indeed directly developed for the purpose of winning wars(although at a more remedial level you could lump this into "dissuading predators") or gaining sexual access to the females of the species.....it's not 100%, regardless of how entertaining it is to state said misnomer.

@Mebe1001 @Kylel999 @Fat_Electrician NASA started as NARA, which grew from the military rocketry exploitation and development programs following WWII. You can't separate NASA from military purposes until the late 70s.

@sidewayskoyote @Roofhopper87 @Fat_Electrician Kindly explain to the class the functional differences and similarities between a solid fuel low orbit rocket and a hydrogen powered heavy lift platform. Don't worry, I'll wait. This is fun.

What bullshit. SLVs *to this day* have dual purpose utility and the technology fuels military development at least as much as civilian. In rocketry, yes. Fuck look at centaur. Then there's the spinoffs. I would give you a heinlein quote or three and explain spinoffs but I don't think you can handle it

@danjamin18 One must admit, their indoctrination techniques work. If your ideology is indefensible, train your members to avoid trying.

Mormons: Facts are lies and anti-lds bigotry.

That would make sense....if there wasn't a clear fork in development between Minuteman and Saturn. A necessary divergence due to different use cases. If you wanted to draw a real corilation, then you would look at the development of composite materials, as their use case in LWF program.

@Mebe1001 @Roofhopper87 @Fat_Electrician He said develop not invent. You think the scud is the pinnacle of technology or something?