Asset Rich 🥀
117.9K posts

Asset Rich 🥀
@AssetRich
Scientist, IT Specialist, Democratic Socialist. ex Labour. #3Point5Percent Consumer of fine (and not so fine) food and alcohol. 'Cum grano salis' optional.


Kanye West should never have been invited to headline Wireless. This government stands firmly with the Jewish community, and we will not stop in our fight to confront and defeat the poison of antisemitism. We will always take the action necessary to protect the public and uphold our values.

Iranian Jewish Rabbi standing on top of the ruins of a bombed synagogue in Tehran by ‘Israel’

JUST IN: Iranians are gathering on bridges and around power plants, forming human chains after threats of US and Israeli strikes on Iran's civilian infrastructure.

He hablado con el presidente de Egipto, @AlsisiOfficial, con el rey de Jordania, @KingAbdullahII, y con el Emir de Qatar, @TamimBinHamad. Todos deseamos un Oriente Medio próspero y en paz. Una escalada del conflicto supondrá un devastador retroceso global. España exige el fin inmediato de esta guerra.

⚡️ 🚫 Bahraini Foreign Minister: We are submitting a draft resolution to the UN Security Council concerning the security of maritime navigation in the Arabian Gulf. Gulf states are the primary source of energy flow to the world, making the Strait of Hormuz a shared international responsibility. If the Security Council allows the Strait of Hormuz to remain closed today, the same will happen with other straits later. #Iran's insistence on disrupting international navigation is not an emergency but rather part of a documented negative approach. The proposed draft resolution does not create a new reality but rather constitutes a serious response to repeated aggressive Iranian behavior.

Trump threatens “a whole civilization will die tonight”. Vance hints at nukes These madmen are openly threatening nuclear annihilation

Iran is likely to deploy human shields to its bridges and power plants tonight. The use of civilians as human shields is banned under the Geneva Conventions (article 51).


The quote has been changed to something completely different - with no explanation. Well, that doesn't make any sense at all, does it? What possible explanation is there for this? Well, I've submitted some questions to @bbcpress.










