Five Metal

23.5K posts

Five Metal

Five Metal

@FiveMeta1_

شامل ہوئے Kasım 2019
79 فالونگ87 فالوورز
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
For the Motherland
For the Motherland@srsasot_·
Anti-China Filipinos: 😱 China is controlling us. Reality: Dude, you have to ask permission from the U.S. just to buy Russian oil. That's how control looks like. Like getting parental consent to join your class filed trip in grade school.
English
92
399
3.4K
68.2K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Framer 🇱🇹
Framer 🇱🇹@Framer_X·
Seedance 2.0 nails any animation style 🔥 Perfect consistency. Frame by frame. Tutorial below👇
English
35
78
725
39.6K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Carl Zha
Carl Zha@CarlZha·
China's UN Ambassador: "US-Israeli atrocity has crossed the line of human morality and conscience"
English
4
71
214
3.5K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
China pulse 🇨🇳
China pulse 🇨🇳@Eng_china5·
Lunch at a public middle school in China. Allowing growing children to eat as much as they need is more important than anything else.
English
115
396
2.6K
317.7K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ponakan Malaikat Izrail
Ponakan Malaikat Izrail@ainunrozi·
well done, they figured it out🤣
English
441
179
444
11.9K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
𝐬𝐨𝐯
𝐬𝐨𝐯@sovietsoleri·
Like tears in rain
English
86
1.6K
19.6K
694.9K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Carl Zha
Carl Zha@CarlZha·
Growing up in Chongqing in the 1980s, I would've never imagined that one day my hometown would have gone viral as a cyberpunk city. None of these buildings in these cityscape videos existed back then
𝐬𝐨𝐯@sovietsoleri

Like tears in rain

English
9
55
1K
18.3K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
CCL
CCL@CCL2K30·
Unitree robots came to Milan, Italy 🇮🇹 to perform a robotic dance—just a small shock at Milan Fashion Week.
English
2
9
36
1.1K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Shanghai Daily
Shanghai Daily@shanghaidaily·
Unitree just launched a panda-themed skin cover for its Go2 robot. The costume itself is priced at 3,500 yuan(US$508), with ultra-realistic panda details. Now you can cuddle a "panda" right at home!
Shanghai Daily tweet mediaShanghai Daily tweet mediaShanghai Daily tweet media
English
11
21
101
14.9K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
el.cine
el.cine@EHuanglu·
China’s Unitree AI Robot performs at duomo di milano
Filipino
49
113
739
83.6K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
宋 文洲
宋 文洲@sohbunshu·
ミラノの街でパフォーマンス 中国Unitree社のAIロボット
日本語
0
9
42
2.5K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
加美财经caus.com
加美财经caus.com@CausMoney·
日本筑波大学附属医院、Omakase Robotics,以及爱知县相关机构,正在试点中国宇树科技的 Unitree G1和日本川崎的 Nyokkey,用于:在大厅进行智能患者引导;夜间巡逻并提供跌倒检测警报;运送文件和医疗样本。 这些机器人并不是在取代护士,它们只是辅助工具,用来在人员短缺和高流动率的情况下,防止医护人员过度疲劳,让护士能够更多专注于真正的患者护理。
中文
0
1
5
6K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Carl Zha
Carl Zha@CarlZha·
Russians hop over to China on hovercrafts for breakfasts
English
14
95
672
20.1K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳 Commentary
When the robots take over, we'll be the ones forced to dance and do backflips. In the meantime, Unitree robots are still the best.
English
12
9
170
8.7K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
NEW【テクノロジーニュース】
【速報】約240万円のヒューマノイドロボットがベッドメイキングや衣類の折り畳みを一人でこなす動画が公開された。Unitree G1は人間に近い器用さで家庭内の作業を実行できるレベルに達しており車の次に家庭に来るものがロボットだという予測が現実味を帯びてきた。
日本語
12
54
212
13.8K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Li Zexin 李泽欣
Li Zexin 李泽欣@XH_Lee23·
China’s Unitree robots are training for hospital care scenarios. We’ll soon have robotic caregivers.
English
16
76
486
24.5K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Lex
Lex@lexx_aura·
Taking Yu-Gi-Oh straight out of the 90s and into next-gen reality. The nostalgia hits so hard right now 😭 "Fusing three souls to unleash absolute destruction" Seedance 2.0
English
27
283
1.9K
72.3K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Mojave Art Club
Mojave Art Club@MojaveArtClub·
A major problem for America is that Americans refuse to believe, conceptually, that defeat can happen. And if it does happen, they assume it must be due purely to boneheaded or cowardly politicians, or a weak-willed public. This unwillingness to accept that some wars simply cannot be won runs deep in the American collective psyche. It allows various political factions to constantly “fall back” to the same excuse whenever their foreign misadventures go wrong. The refrain always becomes: “Well, we didn’t really COMMIT!” or “We didn’t go ALL IN!” The assumption is that any obvious loss was merely the result of a lack of will, not a lack of ability to achieve the stated goal. This mindset is partly the result of America’s relatively young and “childish” national character. As a society with a short history, America has a short memory. For much of its early existence, as the sole great power in the Western Hemisphere, the United States largely avoided the kind of complicated, protracted conflicts that require deft diplomacy and realistic negotiation. Most older, more mature civilizations understand that the world must be shared, because the cost of demanding total victory on every issue is extremely high and rarely worth it. Only Children demand to get their way all the time every time. From its founding in 1776 (and even during the earlier colonial period), America experienced a series of decisive victories in which the United States was able to dictate terms completely: the Mexican-American War, the various wars with Native American tribes, the Spanish-American War, and the Civil War all ended in absolute American victory, with the U.S. getting essentially everything it demanded. World War I was at least a clear military victory, though the U.S. did not get everything it wanted. World War II was a total victory, and America largely achieved its objectives, especially against Japan. It was only after 1945, as America became deeply involved in conflicts and meddling across Africa and Eurasia, that the U.S. began encountering intractable situations that required genuine diplomatic skill and the ability to negotiate. This is when the familiar “cope” emerged: “We totally could have won, but we never do because… well, just BECAUSE!” This narrative persists largely because American politicians struggle to explain why the various foreign adventures keep turning into expensive disasters, complete with blow-back, uncertain outcomes, and so many loose ends that they can hardly be called worthwhile. Americans have never truly learned how to negotiate earnestly or how to live alongside powers they cannot simply boss around and dictate to. To many Americans, every adversary is just another Native American tribe, someone you can engage in bad-faith negotiations with, betray later, or ultimately overpower and impose your will upon. Diplomacy from America more looks like the sort of stalling and leverage jockeying from a cop; with no intention of honoring any deal. I suppose America COULD in theory conquer Iran, it might need somewhere over a million man army, the absolute commitment of the entire US population, acceptance of a draft, stomach for potentially absurd losses in a difficult invasion and occupation of a highly mountainous country twice the size of Texas and in the age of drone warfare this will be absurdly expensive in blood and treasure. Every mountain pass and valley will be paid for in blood as the Russo-Ukraine war shows, turtle strategy is in again with drones. But to what ends would we do this? To reopen a Strait? One that was open before we elected to attack Iran? To make Iranians like us and stop saying they don't like us? To make its leaders put their forehead on that Wall in Jerusalem? Plus the time it would take to assemble the million man army to take on Iran, the world economy can't wait that long while the Hormuz is death gripped by Persian rage. You are talking three to six months until you have the manpower, a year until that manpower is fairly well trained and then the question of where to stage this army for an invasion is another matter, point is this is fantasy land. Real fact is, there was never a point to this war, never an achievable political goal, never one that bombs could achieve or cheeky spy ops, this required actual diplomacy and it will require deft diplomacy to get us out of this disaster because the costs of trying to "Subjugate Iran" are simply absurd and beyond the ability of America to pay.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

Hey Christine, I can answer that. Dominating Iran would be a cakewalk. A few thousand casualties on our side vs. hundreds of thousands on theirs. Not turning it into Afghanistan is also easy. All it requires is our military leaders accepting those high casualty numbers. That’s how we won two world wars. Now before you get upset, know this: I’m not talking about war crimes. I am only talking about accepting a very high number of enemy combatant casualties along with an unfortunate but necessary number of civilians caught in the crossfire. That’s all we need. And high casualty numbers are not a war crime. Death and destruction are allowed under the Geneva Conventions. Just not certain types of death and destruction, like chemical weapons. But winning this way is not going to happen, Christiane, because moving enough tanks and artillery to do that requires a massive sealift operation, and I don’t see any massive cargo ships getting loaded. So yes, the military types are right. We absolutely, positively can dominate Iran. The problem is no politician has removed the handcuffs from our military (called ROEs, Rules of Engagement) since General MacArthur was fired by President Truman for explaining to him exactly what I’m explaining to you right now. Massive sealift of heavy bombs and Army munitions PLUS an order to put as many warheads on enemy foreheads as possible. Dead men do not fight back. Taliban using children as shields and ROEs that only let us kill them at certain times in certain specific situations with a preponderance of evidence… they do shoot back. I don’t see Trump doing that, fighting a traditional war with ROEs that allow us to kill huge numbers of IRGC. But I also don’t see him sending large numbers of boots inland with crazy restrictive ROEs either. The end is likely going to be Option C. What is Option C? I don’t know. Option C is classified.

English
80
355
2.3K
134.3K
Five Metal ری ٹویٹ کیا
Li Zexin 李泽欣
Li Zexin 李泽欣@XH_Lee23·
Huawei puts a private cinema into its electric car. The car is banned in the United States.
English
86
386
4.6K
881.6K