Ben Wisson

The company - incredibly called MAP Adventures - ran a children's care home where it employed convicted criminals to look after vulnerable children. Two of them have now been convicted of sexually abusing a 15 year old girl in their care

You love to point your fingers at other parties. When are you going to look at your own? You’ve got fraudsters, rapists and deviants within the party, what are you going to do about them? Your so called female members aren’t too bothered about the torture rape gang survivors either. You’ll do nothing about your own because you’re all mouth with no backbone or substance and told what to do by @Davos and your backbenchers. Sit down and shut up starmer, you’re losing.

Starmer’s government has stopped answering questions about extradition from Bangladesh since his former Anti-Corruption Minister and bestie, Tulip Siddiq MP, was found guilty of corruption in that country. Coincidence?..

A 51-year old Angolan raped a 16-year-old girl at a Glasgow park Day in, day out, women and girls pay the price Replies turned off @J_A_Fernie

20-year-old Iranian small boat migrant Abdolrahman Banafsha snatched 19-year-old British student Oliwia Zawislak off the street in Cheltenham at midnight. He stalked her down a dark road, grabbed her after she tripped, dragged her by the arm into his house and sexually assaulted her, groping her breasts under her clothes and between her legs while pinning her down. Oliwia screamed and fought him off before escaping. He pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual assault. Sentenced to just 27 months in a young offenders’ institution, plus 10 years on the sex offenders register and automatic deportation. 27 months?!?!

In the weeks leading up to Karl Tuner’s suspension Labour whips and officials began smearing him over his mental health. He asked Keir Starmer to stop the briefings. But they continued > Mail Plus > dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…

Trump demonstrates he doesn’t understand the court’s ballroom ruling. He says he can do whatever he wants because it’s all privately funded by “very rich people.” It’s not about the money - the White House doesn’t belong to him.

The king dishonoured our military doing this. One of my sons was doing his best to kill this monster not so long ago.

FIFTY. ONE. BILLION. POUNDS. Surely a criminal matter now?

This is the "surprise" farmers have found in the fields of Ukraine - a gift from the genocidal terrorists next door. "In a field in the Kyiv region, sappers neutralized the warhead of a Kh-47 ‘Kinzhal’ air-launched hypersonic missile." - State Emergency Service Deming Ukraine will take decades. This war will continue killing Ukrainians long after its end.

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

Angela Merkel just ADMITTED on CAMERA she deliberately flooded Germany with third-world migrants to “stop the far right.” She chose to erase her own people rather than lose power. This wasn’t a mistake. It was demographic warfare. This is TREASON.

"21st Century Invasion: No Tanks, Just Benefits and Breeding" Meet Mohammed — 0 work, 3 wives, 11 kids, everything paid by British taxpayers. How many more are laughing at us right now?

❕ Over the past 100 years, Russia has attacked at least 19 countries, not counting African states, — said Kaja Kallas “Some of them — three or four times. And none of these countries ever attacked Russia.”

This is what life is like in Kharkiv. By the way, Russia is bombing Kharkiv and Kherson almost every day. By “bombing,” I mean civilian homes and cars. Military targets don't count.

Now #Starmer is betraying 17.2m voters to return us to the failing EU.

Officers were not “called out” to people’s homes over tweets! Police deliberately visited people like me to intimidate us on the basis of flimsy accusation which didn’t come near the threshold for criminal investigation. A shameful Orwellian period which appalled the public.

BREAKING NEWS; 320 Illegal Migrants crossed the sea in dinghy’s today & illegally entered Britain & straight into Hotel’s; another instead of being detained AS PROMISED; another Two died in the sea when their boat collapsed; Stop the Boats & Smash the Gangs? UTTER BOLLOX 👇🤷‍♂️🙄

Two migrants died and three were injured — one still missing, after a desperate scramble to board a Britain-bound dinghy near Gravelines Beach in northern France. Around 50 migrants (mostly Arab and African men) sprinted from the dunes, stripped off, pulled on life vests and fought for space on overcrowded boats launched by smugglers. French police stood by filming as chaos unfolded in chest-high water. The horror unfolded on April 1 Hours after Labour signed a fresh £16.2 million two-month deal to pay France to “patrol” the beaches. Channel crossings already at 4,441 this year. We are just throwing tax payers money at the French ..

Brilliant … Grangemouth could have supplied Jet Fuel. But instead we import it. Because we’re saving the planet! It’s a bit of a bummer for you … but Ed will claim it as a Net Zero victory because he wanted to you to cut your air miles anyway 🤡