I know it seems like you have a grudge against crypto, I can’t prove it… but I tested the other day I posted a video about Trump and it got good engagement from random people, then I posted
My crypto content as always and not even my followers get to see it.
Would be great to have a response about it all.
All aggregators had their payouts reduced to 60% this cycle. We will add another 20% deduction in the next cycle.
It became abundantly clear: flooding the timeline with 100 stolen reposts and clickbait everyday crowded-out real creators and hurt new author growth.
The next step is to assign a permanent deduction to habitual bait posters who use “🚨BREAKING”on every post.
X will never infringe on speech or reach—but we will not compensate for manipulation of the program or our users.
Dom Lucre said he posted 100 times in a week.
Now that the money’s gone, so are the stolen clips every 15 minutes.
Funny how fast “content creators” disappear when the $ do.
Imagine if monetization disappeared entirely—this platform would look very different overnight.
Big traditional banks are starting to see tokenisation as real competition.
What do you think - is this good news for the future of blockchain and tokenised assets?
JPMorgan moves $12 trillion every single day.
In his letter, Jamie Dimon named blockchain, stablecoins, and tokenisation as emerging competitors.
His response?
They need to roll out their own blockchain technology.
When the most powerful banker on the planet stops dismissing these tools and starts calling them a threat, it shows something important.
Even the big institutions that once fought tokenisation are now rushing to build it themselves
The CEO of the world’s largest bank just called tokenisation a competitive threat.
Jamie Dimon, who runs JPMorgan Chase, said this in his 2026 shareholder letter.
👇🏻 $ONDO
Institutions are no longer using stablecoins just for trading.
They are now exploring them as collateral, for settling payments, and even as tools for other financial deals.
With new laws like the GENIUS Act and the SEC treating stablecoins more like dollars, big companies are getting curious about on-chain payments.
Even brands like Coca-Cola are looking into it.
This feels like real infrastructure being built for the future.
Ripple just bought a big treasury company - now $XRP and stablecoins have direct access to over 1,100 large businesses.
Jack McDonald, Ripple’s top stablecoin leader, talked about it at the Blockchain Summit.
👇🏻
Someone just predicted $1,000 XRP.
The co-founder of EasyA said it on a podcast.
The hosts laughed because it would make $XRP bigger than every asset on Earth combined
👇🏻
Telecom companies + blockchain + real-world payments. That’s the idea.
What do you think - could mobile carriers make sending money home much cheaper and faster?
The Telcoin community just released RemitMap - a live interactive globe that shows global remittance corridors, telecom market share, and places where fees are hurting people the most.
It uses real World Bank data.
This is more than just a map. It shows what Telcoin is building: mobile carriers becoming blockchain validators so money can flow directly through people’s phones.
Instead of paying high fees, your phone carrier could handle the transfer on-chain.
India receives the most. The US and UAE send the most.
Have you ever asked “is DeFi safe?”
The answer isn’t a single feature. It’s how security is architected.
Let’s break down Grvt’s security stack, and why ZK changes the game. 🧵
Here’s the part most people don’t understand:
Market cap is not real money sitting in the coin.
It’s just the last price multiplied by total supply.
If someone tried to buy that much, the price would shoot up and then crash under its own weight.
$XRP does have real use in cross-border payments, but $1,000 is probably not realistic.