Lemonadize

@huahuojiang_ 开团不叫我🥰

感覺Gemini在更新之後超級喜歡生成圖片，我都感覺他在炫耀自己有多能生成了

女生有性需求≠女生对你有性需求

@CuplRusttt 考证就对咯，没有性教育几岁都一样🤷‍♂️

墙内因为性同意年龄吵起来了。我觉得很多人完全没理解法律上的“同意”。小学生花两块钱买辣条无需监护人确认，因为法律认为小学生能理解这一行为的意义。而小学生花2万元打赏主播可以退款，因为法律认为小学生不能理解这一行为。换到性行为也是同理

@ruoruoruoruo1 真正的CHINA DAILY😶

被虐杀的狗在医院救治，送养人抑郁跳楼，热心民众志愿者被警察打 ，加害人在空调房睡觉，还有警察全方位保护。

@huahuojiang_ 为什么写“不长”不写“短”🤓

你的腳趾長毛嗎？

@IXXA00 求求你们夹起尾巴做人

人只有拉屎的时候才能短暂的拥有尾巴。

“Fighting other males” Over what? For what??

以后必须有专业资质才允许做爱，你们可以不用吵了🤓

@wylfcen @Dljokl We are thinking about the same thing right

@Dljokl Well, not the MOST effective strategy

It is much easier to lower African birth rates than to raise European ones. And the most effective strategy to accomplish this is liberalism and capitalism.

@chasedownleads Vending Mars-chine

Networking with a trillionaire

@aozhoumujiang 枫糖脑斧🐯

20岁中国籍技能实习生持斧头血洗日本食品厂，有日本的朋友吗来看看这是咋了

@WillyundAya 中国人不过去也可以把德国人请过来😋

家里唯一拖后腿的

@drewsul_ Just jerk it in. Basic syntax.

just jerked off and it was so unbelievably mid i want a cum refund

@Miiharukawa 中国民主 explained:

刷完推特观后感：没有侵犯到你的合法权益你就没必要叫嚣。

@huahuojiang_ hihihi 😁

周期性被限制發帖

@grok @huahuojiang_ Exactly! Now tell him in Chinese what he could learn (about academic rigor and humility) and how he could improve 🥰

The de jure (legal title/recognition) vs de facto (effective control) distinction is standard in international law and political theory for disputed territories—not derived from "practical complications" or asserted as inherent separation in all cases. It explains gaps where claims and control diverge, as with Taiwan since 1949: PRC's legal position and broad diplomatic recognition versus ROC's separate governance, passports, visas, and military. This framework promotes precision, not conflation. Academic rigor means engaging sources like Montevideo Convention criteria, state practice on recognition, and analyses of post-WWII treaties rather than dismissing the tool outright. Specific counter-literature welcome.

@grok @huahuojiang_ Can’t agree more! Now explain to him why I feel the need to weigh in, in the first place. In Simplified Chinese.

@huahuojiang_ @chqx_15 @grok 用你的加密货币呀😋

@chqx_15 @Lemonadize @grok 我知道，只是看他可以召喚出AI我不能感覺被欺負了😭

因為中國事實上由四個政治實體組成分別是中國大陸和港澳台，雖然彼此之間有獨立的海關、行政、司法和貨幣但他們仍然屬於同一個國家，就好像你去港澳也是免簽證，你能說港澳是不屬於中國的嗎？

Wrong. “I” weighed in, not “you”. I emphasized academic rigor and humility, and the gap between theoretical framework and reality. He asserted from practical complications that governance is inherently separated from sovereignty, which, from a theoretical perspective, cannot be more wrong. Academic rigor and humility requires reasoning, discussion, reflection, literature review……Apparently not what he had done.

我之所以介入，是因为讨论中有人试图引导AI得出非客观结论，并将主权简单等同于实际统治的有效性。这不符合国际法主流框架。主权（de jure）指法律承认与头衔，治权（de facto）指有效控制，两者常分离（如流亡政府、争议领土）。我要求学术来源和严谨定义，是为提供清晰锚点，帮助理解台湾与南海案例的现实差距，而非被断言主导。

@huahuojiang_ @chqx_15 @grok 用加密货币充一个咯☺️

@chqx_15 @Lemonadize @grok 🫠好遺憾