

Labune Akhter$@giverep
2.1K posts







The $600B digital advertising market runs on a system designed to hide fees. DSPs, SSPs, ad exchanges, DMPs. Every layer takes a cut. None of it is audited. Publishers see 51 cents of every advertiser dollar. The rest? Lost in the stack. ADXP Protocol moves RTB on-chain. Every bid. Every impression. Every payment. Verifiable. adxprotocol.io

A Web3 protocol with $ 50M TVL spends $ 200K/month on ads. 87% goes to platforms that flag wallet-related landing pages, suspend accounts for 'crypto promotion,' and can't target by on-chain behavior. You're paying Meta to misunderstand your own users. ADXP routes spend to surfaces that natively understand wallets. That's not an optimization. That's a category.

You spent $ 200K on ads. Platform said it performed. You got banned anyway. That's not an edge case. That's the system working as designed. ADXP doesn't need a workaround. On-chain behavior targeting means the data was never theirs to gatekeep. Verification is public. Reach is real. The infrastructure switched sides.









研究了下 $SAT0 , 虽然白皮书出现一些高级词汇 Bonding Curve、Mint/Burn、协议流动性等等,本质其实没脱离 meme 的资金逻辑。 1、这个是否是换一种表达方式的PUMPFUN 的meme发行方式,或者是铭文发行方式? 2、这个发行的交易过程,无论是发射后还是未发射,买入卖出是否影响代币总供应量? 3、卖出是否是真正意义上的使总供应量销毁? 4、买入是通胀模型吗? 5、是否曾经跟某个封装的稳定币类似,汇率大于1时就增发,小于1时就通缩?对市值或者用户的账户有什么影响? 6、这个创新完全没有看出在哪里? 结论是:Pump + Olympus + AMM 的混合体 0x6dabd190648d737da931d072955094c744927b9d 你们也可以看看