NoMorePCness 🎗️

Good lord there’s a lot of nastiness on Twitter...and I was just reading my own tweets! #forgivetheanger

Horrible apnews.com/article/virgin…

We’ll hit rock bottom putting up with this crap, and it’s Goodnight Irene.

@RealCandaceO You are a horrible person

The public should continue to be outraged over this recent lie from Turning Point USA. To recap, Erika Kirk flew into Athens, Georgia from Palm Beach on Tuesday after a weekend bridal shower at Mar A Lago. She flew in aboard a massive, apartment-sized jet owned by Vegas billionaires. She landed into a terminal which had been secured, since Monday, by our nation’s secret service. There was both a military and police presence waiting at that terminal to escort the VP who was due to land about an hour and 30 minutes after her. After learning of the crowd size, Erika decided she no longer wanted to do the event. Rather than simply cancelling, she instructed her PR team to make up a demented lie about imminent threats against her travel safety. Again, she was ALREADY IN GEORGIA sitting upon a federally cleared pathway. Her PR agent and the Vice President then shamelessly lectured the audience about these invisible threats, suggesting they were the public’s fault for having criticized her. UTTERLY INDEFENSIBLE AND PSYCHOPATHIC.

@ScottJenningsKY You’re brilliant

Dems suddenly have thoughts about religion when it can be weilded as a weapon against President Trump. I don't recall any handwringing when Joe Biden publicly opposed Catholic church doctrine on abortion and gay marriage though 🤷‍♂️

@EricLDaugh Excellent

🚨 SCOTT JENNINGS DROPS THE MIC “He's not obligated to make policy based on the Pope's theology. If Dems really want to use Catholic doctrine to shape U.S. policy, why don't we do ABORTION next?” 🫳🏻🎤

@Vitus_osst Sure you can

You can't be a Catholic and stand against the Pope.

@seasonmeta @Nance726 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro The problem is no one should worship anything or anyone else other than Jesus. Idol worship sends you directly to Hell

@Nance726 @Matthews_angst @BaloneTone @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro Lots of good stuff here. I do not get all of the fighting over this. It's All Good. 🙏

Praying to Mary IS NOT worshiping her.

@isaacrrr7 @TheNewRevolut12 Were you threatened? @GiorgiaMeloni

Giorgia Meloni: "Italia y Europa necesitan inmigrantes". Europa logró destruir incluso a Meloni.

Not long ago gay marriage was iIIegal, now it's legal along with buying babies How did we get here?

@Nance726 @DennisA09866122 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro I didn’t lie. I was responding and it would not let me. Thought you blocked me. You deleted the nasty. I’m done too. I’ll pray for you. Repent is a great start for all.

Yeah, I sent it before I was done writing, so I copied it and pasted it to all of the rest of the text that I had forgotten to send. Which also proves that you haven’t read a single word that I’ve sent you. You are a bad faith actor from top to bottom. First you LIED about me blocking you then you call me a witch, and then you pretend that I admitted text by taking a screenshot of something that was incomplete. You are not a good faith actor. I am done wasting my time on you. Again, I say this to you repent.

@Matthews_angst @Nance726 @DennisA09866122 @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro People need to stand for the truth. People are perishing for lack of knowledge. Please forgive the witch remark. But my faith is not a “book club”.

@BaloneTone @Nance726 @DennisA09866122 @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro I’m disengaging with this thread now . You guys can carry on , but as brothers and sisters , keep it polite . Calling people witches and the like will not bear fruit .

@Matthews_angst @Nance726 @DennisA09866122 @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro We aren’t sisters. God bless

Stormy Daniels looks dramatically different in new photos- as disgraced ex-attorney Michael Avenatti moves to halfway house trib.al/Wpp8fBp

@Nance726 @DennisA09866122 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro Oh so you erased the nasty post then

@BaloneTone @DennisA09866122 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro You’re a liar. I do not have you blocked. I’ve never had you blocked. I most certainly am not a witch- And bearing false witness is a sin. Repent.

@DennisA09866122 @Nance726 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro She’s a witch trying to lead people astray. She blocked me because she’s delusional

@Nance726 @Matthews_angst @BaloneTone @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro AND when was the Last Time that You served Communion if I might Ask!! Just Curious 🤔🤔✅✅

@PatriciaHeaton @americanshomer Yikes…no.

😁

@Nance726 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro Good Lord…read it again. It’s insane to believe that Mary and Joseph didn’t have other children. He is coming again….ask Jesus for the truth as I did many years ago. I was raised catholic and the priests hid the scriptures from “lay people”. Another SIN

You’ve come to the Right place, Mister Balone! This is not the first time I have had this conversation and certainly will not be my last. I have again copious notes. I said this earlier, but it also bears repeating the problem for you guys is that you believe sola scripture and therefore all you have is the English translation that you understand. You do not realize that there are words that have multiple meanings depending on the language that they’re being translated from so very often the translation in English that you’re reading is off base in some ways. This is no exception here. 1st fallacy- MARY HAD OTHER CHILDREN: No, she did not… 1. Scripture never actually says Mary had other children There is no verse in Scripture that explicitly says Mary had biological children besides Jesus. What Protestants usually point to are verses mentioning the “brothers” of Jesus (e.g., Mark 6:3). But here’s the issue: 👉 The word used is the Greek adelphoi—which does not strictly mean biological brothers. In Semitic/Jewish usage, it can mean: cousins relatives close kin This is consistent with the Old Testament: In Genesis 13:8, Abraham calls Lot his “brother”—but Lot is his nephew. 2. The “brothers of Jesus” are identified elsewhere Two of the “brothers” named—James and Joses—are clearly linked to another woman: Mark 15:40 refers to “Mary the mother of James and Joses” This is not the Virgin Mary, but another Mary at the Cross So Scripture itself separates them from Mary, the Mother of Jesus. 3. Jesus entrusting Mary to John makes no sense if she had other sons At the Crucifixion: “Behold your mother” (John 19:26–27) If Mary had other biological sons, this would be unnecessary—and even culturally inappropriate. In Jewish law and custom, her care would belong to her own children, not a disciple. This moment only makes sense if: 👉 Jesus is her only so 4. “Until” does NOT imply later change Matthew 1:25 says Joseph “knew her not until she had borne a son.” Protestants often assume this means relations happened afterward—but that’s not how biblical language works. Example: 2 Samuel 6:23 — “Michal had no child until the day of her death” → She obviously didn’t have children after death So “until” does not imply a change afterward. 5. Mary is the New Ark of the Covenant From a deeper theological level: The Ark of the Covenant was set apart, holy, untouched (2 Samuel 6) Mary is the Ark who carried God Himself Luke 1 intentionally mirrors 2 Samuel: “How can the ark come to me?” ↔ “Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?” David leaps ↔ John the Baptist leaps If the Ark was untouchable, how much more the womb that bore Christ? 6. The earliest Christians all believed this This isn’t a “later Catholic invention.” Early Christians—including those closest to the Apostles—consistently taught Mary’s perpetual virginity: St. Jerome (4th century) fiercely defended it against critics St. Augustine affirmed it Even Protestant Reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin accepted it 👉 Denying it is actually a later development, not an original Christian belief 7. The deeper point: this is about Christ, not just Mary Mary’s perpetual virginity points to something bigger: Jesus is not just another child—He is the only-begotten Son Mary’s womb is uniquely consecrated for the Incarnation This is about the uniqueness of Christ, not elevating Mary improperly.

@Nance726 @Matthews_angst @rockreborn22 @Catholic_bro Still wrong. Are you Born Again? Because Jesus said you need to be born of the spirit! READ THE REAL BIBLE. When saved, we all receive the Holy Spirit. He is the Helper. Ask Jesus to show you. I grew up catholic and they have added to the orig text. A SIN

“Mary Was a Vessel” FALSE If Mary were merely a vessel, why did the Angel Gabriel greet her with a title, not just a name—‘Hail, full of grace’—and stand in awe before asking her consent? Vessels don’t consent. Persons do. And she didn’t just carry the Word made flesh—she gave Him His human flesh.” 🔹 1. Mary freely consented — not a passive object Luke 1:38: “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be done to me according to your word.” God didn’t use Mary like an object. He asked her. She actively cooperated in salvation history. Her “yes” (fiat) was necessary for the Incarnation to take place—just as Adam and Eve’s free “no” opened the door to sin. ⮕ Vessels don’t give permission. Mary did. 🔹 2. The Holy Spirit overshadowed her—and stayed Luke 1:35: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.” She didn’t merely carry God like a temporary package. The Holy Spirit overshadowed her like He once overshadowed the Ark of the Covenant—a sign of God’s intimate, sanctifying presence. ⮕ She became a living dwelling place of God, more sacred than the Holy of Holies. 🔹 3. She gave God His body Galatians 4:4: “God sent His Son, born of a woman…” That “woman” was Mary. Jesus took His real, human nature—His hands, His eyes, His heart—from her. The DNA that would be offered on the cross came from her body. No one else in history did that. ⮕ She was not just a channel. She was the source of His humanity. 🔹 4. Scripture exalts her—so should we Luke 1:48: “All generations will call me blessed…” Mary prophetically states that every generation of Christians will honor her—not ignore her, diminish her, or reduce her to “just a vessel.” That’s the Holy Spirit speaking through her. ⮕ To reduce Mary is not humility—it’s disobedience to Scripture. 🔹 5. If the Ark was sacred, how much more Mary? The Ark of the Old Covenant carried: •the Word of God (stone tablets), •the manna (bread from heaven), •and Aaron’s rod (symbol of priestly authority). Mary, the Ark of the New Covenant, carried: •the Word made flesh, •the Bread of Life, •and the true High Priest. ⮕ If God struck Uzzah dead for touching the old Ark (2 Sam 6), how sacred must be the one who bore God Himself? 🔹 6. Finally: Christ honors His Mother. Shouldn’t we? John 19:27: “Behold your mother.” Exodus 20:12: “Honor your father and your mother.” Jesus perfectly fulfilled the Law—including the 4th Commandment. If He honors His Mother—body, soul, and role—how can His followers do less? ⮕ Reducing Mary isn’t just an insult to her—it’s a dishonor to Christ Himself. Mary is not just a vessel; she is the Theotokos—the Mother of God—chosen, overshadowed, and honored by God Himself: If the Creator didn’t reduce her, why should the creature?