Izzy ♱ ENHYPEN IS 7

I’ve been reading this insightful article by Knowledge at Wharton Staff (2010) that breaks down the historical effectiveness of organized boycotts. If you think boycotting "doesn't work", you haven't been looking at history. 🧵

the sun will shine on us again engenes

btw, sorry for the grammatical errors, it’s 3am over here and I just had woken up

he’s so hot, ugh, he pisses me off (in a horny way)

“Untangling the Boycott Movement” uhmm… i think it’s better if you do that about Belift’s mistreatment and slavery towards the members? Okay, guys, if you don’t want to boycott, then don’t. We are not forcing you. That’s why they worked with the fbs to be united. yawa na yan.

@wonnstrck @yuniyoiz She clearly doesn’t, even an opinion article, being written by a professional, would need back up points, like citing studies or scientific evidence and then make the argument on why it apply/does not apply to this situation

@Bellamicb @yuniyoiz tbh when i read that i felt like she doesn’t know the difference between a news article and an opinion article or even an argumentative dissertation. i’ve been studying that for years and any one of my professors would be ???? reading this

for sofiadreamsof who likes journalism sm i just wanna start with, the fact that you speak in a academic/professional way doesn’t immediately make information credible. you claim this article is research based but in reality is written in order to discredit the boycott side. you start explaining how you wrote it based on research but then you say that the research is “private lists” “ot6 supporters” and “whistleblowers.” problem here, these are all “sources” that are pre filtered and already aligned with previous interpretations. you claim to have done research on both sides but the whole article is discrediting and attacking the boycott side. “hunger for attention” unprofessional and biased, if you had done proper research you’d be listing good and bad things from both sides, in reality you didn’t analyze the antiboycott side equally. you cant go around pretending to be giving good information and research-based articles when all of then are made to attack the boycott side. i think what got me is your attempt to pretend you’re a professional, when you can’t even write like one by heavily showing on which side you are. also the article isn’t based on valid real information, but mostly on your speculations. tracking our followers and usernames, speculations don’t count as facts btw. you’re assuming “they’ve lost but won’t admit it” and “they can no longer back down” when there’s no quote or data that support your claims. there’s so much imbalance in most of your articles in which you barely analyze the anti-boycott side, and continuously pick and choose whatever you want from the boycott side to fit it into YOUR own narrative. “they don’t have articulated demands” “the only clear demand is that they want heeseung back” and this an example of incomplete representation! here’s where you either didn’t research properly or you decided to ignore this part so we would look as the bad guys. we’ve stated multiple times that heeseung isn’t our only goal/reason for this boycott and that our main goal is for enhypen to have creative freedom and better treatment. we also have a whole headline together with our tags that mostly explains what we want. also, contradiction at its finest: you claim that the boycott side is small group, however you state that we’re highly organized and have a whole movement, trending every day. you claim we’re a small minority while at the same time attributing us high levels of coordination. once again, you have no way of proving how this is measured. you’re using professional language (partially) while using selective info, twisting facts which makes it look like you KNOW what you’re talking about and like this is a factual argument but in reality the whole article is lacking. you heavily attack and paint the boycotters as the bad side without analyzing the antiboycott side properly. you’re favoring their side over anything and where i want to get with this is that you can’t act professional on an article while actively being biased.

a las que les dio igual o aceptaron como si nada la salida de Hee, en el fondo siempre fueron sus antis ;)

Vlog 1: taking the baby to visit dad (hee) at the studio

them doing hours of research to post "untangling the boycott movement"

"No eres leal a ENHYPEN, eres leal a lo que hybe te vende. Te vendieron OT6, y lo compraste" ACABA DE REVIVIR LA LITERATURA.

@ikeuglazer likee, they boys have been harassed for a long time without the company doing anything but yeah, lets expose other fans that just think different #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

if only y’all put this much energy into speaking about enhypen’s mistreatment

We’re going to address this so called wannabe article that was just posted a few hours ago by this random account that is clearly obsessed, because this is honestly giving very stalkerish behavior. What we’re looking at is not neutral analysis or “critical thinking.” This is a heavily biased narrative built on confirmation bias, loaded language, and pure assumptions. The writer clearly started with a conclusion first and then built an entire story around usernames, follower counts, screenshots, and speculation just to fit that narrative. Psychologically, this is exactly how bias works. Once someone decides what they want to believe, every normal fandom behavior gets interpreted through that lens. Group chats become “elite circles.” Trending tags become a “high control hive.” Fans sharing information becomes “control.” Be serious for a second. If coordinated tag drops, reminder waves, group chats, and fanbases announcing schedules make us a “high control hive,” then by that logic every K pop fandom is one. Because this is literally standard fandom behavior across K pop. So either this label applies to every fandom, or this is a selective and ignorant attempt to villainize one side. At this point, the obsession has gone way too far. Writing entire dossier style threads about regular fan accounts, assigning motives to strangers, and acting like normal fandom coordination is some conspiracy is honestly weird. Girly, get a real job. Other than being a resident OT7 account watcher #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

journalism isn’t for everyone btw

Heeseung is coming back to enhypen Enhypen is seven All of them are healthy All of them get to focus on their personal artistic vision All of them go to a long family tour God pls. #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

@TheMalibuQueen ENGENEs will continue to support all seven members. BELIFT must take immediate and decisive action to address the demands raised by ENGENEs. #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

Drop some tags!! #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

For years, the group have been constantly been harassed and stalked by antis and saesangs. Victims of ill-intended behavior. And yet some are using their platforms just to “expose” a group who does not have the same opinions as theirs instead of what matters. Right.

#noticing how we are spreading awareness and advocating for the boys and their artist rights and safety while the other side is just trying to stop us

@jenwithwon the have to be on our business because they not accomplished anything impactful yet

i’m pretty mad at these ot6s slandering around about us including making undercover accounts while ‘psychoanalyses’ and putting us on the jumbotron when the only thing you should do is shut up and focus on your ot6 stuff.

@ikeuglazer you would think that freedom of speech and opinion doesn’t exist anymore, for the way they are moving

i’m confused as to why anti boycotters are mass reporting ot7 enjins with a different opinion than them..? instead you should put that energy towards antis who are constantly setting up and slandering enha but that’s just my opinion

@ennhaa77 pleaseee #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

And what if we get ot7 enchella for 2027? #OUR_BOND_IS_7 #HEAL_THE_GAP_BELIFT

at hybe, random tuesday morning ☀️ 9:00am. heeseung : sup gang, i wanna go solo and leave the group i have been with for so long RIGHT NOW!! CANCEL MY CONTRACT EARLY. I WANT TO FACE THE PENALTIES AND RISK GETTING SUED TOO. belif : yes sir, sorry sir, we will do this right away sir!! let me also get you your premium cut steak and fine aged wine while we are at it! heeseung : oh also, i want to stay in the same label as my former group even tho the label mistreats us all and could sue and penalty me because that makes total sense too.