
Rogan is laughing at him, not with him. Pierre is too dumb to realize it.
winston smith
67.2K posts

@ChanceStarkin
Not a stranger in a strange land.

Rogan is laughing at him, not with him. Pierre is too dumb to realize it.

There are no independent eyewitness testimonies for Jesus of Nazareth. There are only claims of a revelatory Christ Jesus. Paul never met a human Jesus. The Gospels were written decades later by anonymous authors who weren't there. Every piece of early "evidence" traces back …

This bible verse is illegal in Canada. So I'm gonna post it everyday. Day 13: "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who submit to or perform homosexual acts," 1 Corinthians 6:9 BSB

If everyone went vegan, we could "free up" 75% of agricultural land. This is cited frequently. It is from Poore & Nemecek 2018, a paper which the authors themselves noted does not advocate for universal veganism and does not account for the nutritional consequences of removing animal products from the food supply. But take the premise at face value. What do you do with the freed land? If you rewild it: see the scrub succession problem above. If you grow crops on it: most of it isn't arable. That's why it had animals on it. If you leave it: the soil carbon locked in permanent pasture is destabilised when you remove grazing and the root systems change. "Free up land" assumes the land wants to be freed and has somewhere to go. It doesn't. It is currently functional. The function involves a cow. The fantasy that removing animals from agriculture produces a net ecological gain requires you to not look very carefully at what the animals were doing and what happens in their absence. Look carefully. This is the bit they skip.

Oh no!!!! Whatever will the elbowzos crowd bitch about now!?! 🤣🤣🤣

For years they told us real food was the enemy! Now the narrative’s finally cracking. If protein and real fats were never the problem...why did we spend decades replacing them with processed substitutes? MAHA

The number 1 thing atheists simply cannot understand is this: If you change the foundation of reality, you change reality. You can’t change how and why everything is here and expect for nothing else to change. Our understanding of morality, meaning, science, personhood, choice, design, beauty, rationality, etc…. All of it. All of it changes.

You still owe him money.

We’ve only seen minds make things that are intelligible.

The Big Bang theory has changed dramatically. Now, some suggest nothing exploded from nothing. This defies simple science: where did matter, energy, and organization come from? It's a tale of faith, not facts. #BigBang #Cosmology #ScienceDebate

When Adam was lonely, God gave him one woman. -Not a man. -Not a one-night stand. -Not multiple women. Just Eve.

Is this the greatest atheist cope?

MAHA Tip of the Day: Prioritize protein at every meal. -Eggs -Beef -Chicken -Lamb -Fish -Full-fat dairy Protein builds muscle, stabilizes blood sugar, supports hormones, & keeps you full without the crashes from processed carbs or sugars. Are you getting enough protein? MAHA

There is no sin. Intercourse isn’t sin. It is natural.

Q: Why do hospitals serve some of the most toxic, ultra-processed junk food imaginable? A: Because the system isn't built to cure illness. It's built to manage it... FOREVER. Who's ready to demand hospitals stop feeding disease & start feeding health? MAHA

Everything that begins has a creator. God never began, He is the beginning and the end. God exists outside the chain of creation; He is the source of all things, not a created being.

Your phone is hijacking your brain—and you’re letting it. Constant scrolling spikes dopamine, shreds focus, and rewires your reward system. Step away, reclaim your attention, and feel your mind come back online. Are you on your phone all day? MAHA


I am beginning to think this ridiculous argument is repeated 100 times a day just to trigger atheists. They know we can absolutely deny the unsubstantiated “facts”.