DNA Mindset

@thematrixwizard “Human” is a creation of mathematics.

Perfect Circles Don't Exist... (Because they are limited to the necessary ontology of the universe)... @Jasonquantum1

@walterkirn Mathematics: The coherent truth about the world that transcends all characters.

Mathematics: The attempt to tell a coherent story about the world without using characters.

So become nobody... x.com/DNAMindset/sta…

Α and Ω

Nobody truly knows...

Trinity

Everybody manipulates Matter Nobody manipulates Waves 🌊

activated & aligned

What a power man has to do nothing except what God will approve, and to accept all that God may give him.

The singularity is the soul of the cosmos.

@Kekius_Sage Only when we understand nothing perfectly.

Will we ever truly understand everything?

It still is…

So many phonies, so few who are the real deal

The universe begins and ends with infinite zeros.

Gustave Doré - The Circle of Angels, Dante's Paradiso

Debate between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is one of the most profound philosophical clashes in the history of science and metaphysics, centered on a simple yet deeply compelling question: What are space and time? In the early 18th century, this disagreement unfolded through a series of letters, most notably in the Leibniz–Clarke Correspondence, where Leibniz challenged Newton’s ideas through Newton’s supporter, Samuel Clarke. Newton believed that space and time were absolute realities. To him, space existed like an invisible stage on which all physical events take place, and time flowed uniformly everywhere, unaffected by anything in the universe. Even in a completely empty universe, space and time would still exist, unchanged and real. Leibniz strongly opposed this view. He argued that space and time are not independent entities but relationships between objects and events. Space is simply the arrangement of things, and time is the sequence in which changes occur. Without objects or events, space and time have no meaning. The debate extended beyond physics into deeper philosophical and theological questions. Leibniz used logical reasoning to argue that absolute space makes little sense because there would be no reason for the universe to exist in one position rather than another. Newton’s side, defended by Clarke, responded that space is real and ultimately grounded in the existence and will of God. This debate remains important even today because it shaped how we think about the universe. Newton’s ideas dominated classical physics for centuries, but later developments, especially relativity, reintroduced a more relational understanding of space and time, bringing modern physics closer to what Leibniz had imagined.

@QuanticASI It is thought itself.

@DNAMindset can you think about the nothing?

are you thinking about the "nothing"?