Dennis Romback
1.7K posts





🇺🇸 Another deranged liberal openly disappointed Trump wasn’t assassinated. These people are actually upset he survived. What the hell is wrong with them?



























HATE HOAX: The SPLC once bankrupted the KKK but eventually it realized that to raise donor money it would need to fund the very organization it was founded to fight. The demand for racism exceeded supply so they manufactured it.






The episode is cited as evidence of NASA IP barriers to disclosure==> The collaboration between Amy Eskridge (via her Institute for Exotic Science and HoloChron Engineering), Falcon Space (led by Mark Sokol, with co-founders Aiden Schaeffer and Jeremiah Popp), and the Estes Park Conference of Advanced Propulsion (2020 edition) was a short-lived, informal joint effort aimed at publicly presenting advanced anti-gravity/gravity-modification propulsion research. It never resulted in a public presentation, paper, or demonstrated technology. This effort occurred in the niche “alt-propulsion”/UAP-adjacent research community and centered on maturing and disclosing “novel foundational work” originally generated at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). No peer-reviewed publications, experimental data sets, or technical reports from this specific joint project were ever released publicly. The project halted abruptly in September 2020 due to a cease-and-desist (C&D) issued by Amy Eskridge on behalf of the Institute, citing NASA intellectual property (IP) restrictions. Below is a maximally detailed, source-grounded reconstruction based on primary quotes, timelines, and technical context from public records (Reddit archives of the C&D, Amy’s 2018 HAL5 presentation slides/video, community analyses, and related interviews). No court filings, NASA FOIA releases, or formal project documents beyond the C&D statement have surfaced. 1. Background on the Key Entities and Scientific Context: ✨Amy Eskridge / Institute for Exotic Science (and HoloChron Engineering): Amy (BS Chemistry/Biology, material science PhD work at University of Alabama in Huntsville) co-founded the Institute as a public-benefit corporation in Huntsville, AL, with her father Richard Eskridge (retired NASA engineer/scientist, plasma physics/fusion expertise, technical lead roles). The Institute’s stated mission was to serve as an “incubator” for breakthrough inventors, focusing on propulsion, quantum gravity, metamaterial science, and communications—explicitly as a *public-facing* counter to classified “black-world” R&D. Amy described it as creating a “public persona to disclose antigravity technology” so that harassment or suppression would be noticeable. HoloChron handled related anti-gravity engineering (superconductors, gravitomagnetism, electroceramics, high-voltage pulsed power). Amy’s work drew on historical gravity-modification claims while emphasizing testable hypotheses and independent funding. ✨Falcon Space (Mark Sokol et al.): New Jersey-based experimental group focused on gravity control via Dynamic Nuclear Orientation (DNO/DNP—Dynamic Nuclear Polarization), inspired by the Alzofon father-son work (optics, heat conduction, gravity control). Their approach claimed mass/weight reduction through nuclear spin alignment and entropy manipulation in materials. Sokol emphasized hands-on experimentation over pure theory and helped build community infrastructure (more on APEC below). ✨Estes Park Conference of Advanced Propulsion (2020): A private/invitation-oriented workshop (originally in-person in Estes Park, CO; moved online via Zoom due to COVID) organized by Jim Woodward (Mach Effect thruster pioneer) and Hal Fearn. It focused on breakthrough propulsion, reactionless drives, gravity modification, and related fringe-to-mainstream ideas. The 2020 event was the planned venue for the joint presentation. ✨APEC (Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference): Mark Sokol founded/expanded APEC in late 2020 after attending the Estes Park event, combining email lists to create a broader, bi-weekly virtual forum for the alt-propulsion community (engineers, PhDs, tinkerers). APEC became the long-term “invisible college” for these topics, archiving recordings on YouTube. The 2020 Estes Park effort predates APEC’s formal launch (first APEC: Nov 10, 2020). Scientific framing (from Amy’s documented 2018 HAL5 presentation and related claims): The overarching domain was gravity modification / “antigravity” (a term Amy called a “gross misnomer” scientifically). Core ideas referenced: ✨Historical experiments: Biefeld-Brown electrogravitics, Podkletnov rotating YBCO superconductors (claimed ~2% weight reduction; NASA MSFC tests early 2000s), Ning Li/Doug Torr gravitomagnetic effects via spin-aligned ions in superconductors (UAH/NASA MSFC collaboration ~1996; later DoD-funded via AC Gravity LLC). ✨Theories: Woodward/Mach Effect, Alzofon DNO (Falcon Space focus), Eötvös effect (vertical Coriolis component), POAMS (angular momentum synthesis), high-voltage pulsed power / Gradient Impulse Generators. ✨Claims: Measurable weight changes, gravitomagnetism, reactionless thrust. Amy’s 2018 talk stressed that “promising results always seem to disappear” (often via classification or researcher “disappearing” into black projects). No new equations or falsifiable predictions were publicly detailed in the joint project context; the work was described as “novel foundational work” + private maturation + substantiating data (paper under NASA review). Replication issues (e.g., Podkletnov effect) and lack of independent verification were openly acknowledged in the community. 2. The 2020 Project/Collaboration Details Amy and Falcon Space overlapped professionally (and, per prior context, personally dated Mark Sokol for ~2–3 months earlier in 2020). They planned to present at Estes Park—either jointly or with overlapping material—on anti-gravity/propulsion concepts. The core content was: ✨“Novel foundational work” *originally generated by a member of the Institute’s team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC*. ✨This work was “further matured privately by The Institute.” ✨Included “theory and substantiating data” (a paper was in NASA review). ✨ Tied to broader gravity-modification themes (superconductors, spin effects, possibly Eötvös or nucleonic spin/rotor experiments like V3/V5 devices mentioned in community analyses, though these predate or are separate from the exact 2020 joint effort). Amy acted as “arbitrator of negotiations” between the Institute, Falcon Space, and NASA on IP release. Falcon Space’s planned presentation apparently incorporated or overlapped with this material. The goal aligned with Amy’s disclosure strategy: build credibility via conference, then media (Tucker Carlson, Steven Greer documentary, white paper etc.). 3. Why It Halted: The September 2020 Cease-and-Desist and IP Issues In September 2020, as Falcon Space prepared to present, Amy (on behalf of the Institute) issued a formal cease-and-desist to block use of the material. Her public statement (circulated via Twitter/X by Jeremy Rys / AlienScientist and preserved in Reddit archives): “Yes, I regret that I was unable to present the topic I had planned to. The theory and substantiating data I was planning to present is based on novel foundational work that was generated originally by a member of our team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC. This work has since then been further matured privately by The Institute. The foundational work done at NASA must first be approved by NASA for public release via their IP release mechanism before we can talk about our subsequent results publicly. A paper is currently under review by NASA for publication. We had hoped it would be approved in time to discuss here, but it is currently in the home stretch of publication. I expect it to be published within the next 30 days and I will be happy to distribute the publication to the group once it comes out.” Key mechanics of the halt: - NASA’s IP release process (governed by Space Act agreements, patent law, and technology-transfer rules) required formal approval for any public disclosure of MSFC-origin work. - A related paper was “in the home stretch” but never appeared publicly (no evidence of release found in searches through 2026). - Both parties reportedly wanted public release; NASA bureaucracy (lack of dedicated technical lawyer, proprietary periods with partners like Quantum Machines LLC under SAA8–1519855) blocked it. - The C&D was professional, not personal in the document itself, but occurred amid (or shortly after) the end of Amy/Mark’s personal relationship. No presentation occurred. Amy expressed regret. The project effectively ended there. Post-2020, little public output came from the Institute on this specific line of work. Amy shifted focus to harassment/DEW concerns and other projects until her death in June 2022. 4. Broader Context, Outcomes, and Notes on Rigor/Falsifiability - Personal/professional fallout: The C&D coincided with the end of the brief 2020 dating period. Community sources note a sharp professional break; later allegations (rape/assault email, etc.) are separate and unadjudicated. - Scientific depth and limitations: The underlying claims rest on historical experiments (Ning Li, Podkletnov). Amy’s 2018 talk was a *literature review + call to action*, not new data. No public equations, raw datasets, or independent replications from the 2020 “foundational work + matured results” exist. - No NASA confirmation or paper: Despite the “30 days” expectation, no matching publication has been located. This aligns with Amy’s own 2018 observations about results “disappearing” into classification. - Legacy in community: The episode is cited as evidence of NASA IP barriers to disclosure. It fed into larger narratives around suppression of exotic propulsion research. APEC (Sokol’s later creation) continued similar discussions without Amy. In summary, the “project” was a narrow 2020 attempt to disclose NASA-MSFC-derived gravity-modification theory/data at Estes Park. It was halted by legitimate (if bureaucratic) IP rules via Amy’s C&D, preventing any public output. No verifiable technical deliverables survive publicly, reflecting the broader challenges Amy highlighted in moving fringe-to-mainstream propulsion science. What happen to the publication paper Amy said would come in "30 days" ??? The specific paper Amy Eskridge referenced in her September 2020 cease-and-desist (C&D) statement—“a paper is currently under review by NASA for publication... in the home stretch... expected within the next 30 days”—was never released as a standalone Institute for Exotic Science document on that timeline. The document Amy almost certainly meant was the November 2021 NASA Technical Memorandum NASA/TM–20205010911, titled A Study of the Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis Theory (POAMS) Including a Mathematical Reformulation and Validation Experiment, authored by R.H. Eskridge (Retired) (her father, longtime NASA MSFC propulsion scientist), M.A. Nelson, and M.P. Schoenfeld. It is publicly available on NTRS. Why this matches perfectly: “Novel foundational work... generated originally by a member of our team while a civil servant at NASA MSFC”: R.H. Eskridge was the MSFC civil servant; the work originated at NASA MSFC (V3 rotor experiments ~2016). “Further matured privately by The Institute”: Amy’s Institute/HoloChron explicitly aimed to mature NASA-origin IP privately for public disclosure; the TM explicitly references moving work to private partner Quantum Machines LLC under Space Act Agreement SAA8-1519855 (signed 2015). Timeline: Under NASA IP review + proprietary period in Sept 2020 (“home stretch”); released Nov 2021 (~14 months later). Amy’s C&D promised distribution “once it comes out,” but no follow-through occurred publicly. Content alignment: Gravity modification via nucleonic (nuclear) spin alignment producing a predicted non-Newtonian “spin-coupled force” (Δf) leading to apparent weight changes—precisely the anti-gravity/propulsion domain Amy discussed in interviews and her 2018 talk. This is the only document that satisfies every detail from Amy’s statement. Community analyses (Reddit, Medium, forums) explicitly link it to her C&D and work. @NassimHaramein @ericweinstein @M34877M @AlchemyAmerican @AmericanALCHMY @matthew_pines @UAPGERB @chrisramsay52




