Than Christopoulos - Inspiring Philosophy

@dromar4truth @Deenresponds @Haqiqatjou I tackle this in my new video on our channel premise 9 I believe (external verification argument) :)

Hi Than, yesterday I went on your live show but Michael closed it before I can get on. I have a question for you. Even though I waited to ask you and couldn’t yesterday—hopefully, I don’t have to wait may days for your response as the question is fairly simple. You mentioned that prophecy for Muhammad in the Bible involves circular reasoning if Muslims says Bible is corrupted. But couldn’t you be mistaken in following scenario: If the prophecy is specific enough, then it would inherently count as a prophecy, no? Let’s say that the Bible says a prophet will come after Jesus from an area that is south of Jerusalem. That prophecy would be vague. But if the prophecy says that the next Prophet’s name is Muhammad and he will be from Arabia—then I assume you agree that this is not some mistake that can find it’s way and corrupt the Bible but rather is something that indicates revelation as it’s not something someone can randomly come up with. Right?

Do we think @Deenresponds will also finally engage with the model I’ve told him about yet?

@1IDMountainMan I like my acoustic version more still 😂

This song goes hard! "We lost the truth for dopamine, Sold our souls to silver screens. Chained by choice, we called it free, Now we burn in our own disease" @ExploringReali2 youtu.be/VbMQqmjz5L8?si…

@bigjonsteel Bro who in tf is doing this?

Muslims literally spend days insulting me and my wife calling her all sorts of names, and when I start dishing it back they make videos about how I’m not Christ like and bad representation for Christianity. But they don’t call out their own when they call my wife a whore

Imagine being so intellectually bankrupt that your best argument against ex-Muslim women is calling us whores. The only “apologist whores” here are the ones who keep apologizing for a 7th-century warlord who had 30 men of Al-Zutt bang him in one night. @Acts17David @ReasonedAnswers @InspiringPhilos @ElleISOElohim @TweetYBIC

I am beyond sick of this world of clips, and clip hunting. 5 second gotchya moments and rhetoric of who can make who look stupid. Grow up stand on your beliefs ten toes down

@CounterApologis I don’t really have a video on this. It’s a weird long story filled with undulations between atheism and theism

@ExploringReali2 First of all, how dare you. Second of all, did you have a video or article talking about why you converted? If I recall from way back, you were an atheist?

Planning on tackling it later this year hopefully.

@CounterApologis I have other priorities right now I’m sorry 😭 hope you’re well bro

@ExploringReali2 This doesn't help me NOW though! 🤣

🧵Your daily reminder that the so-called “Orthodox” Muslim (@muslimorthodoxy) isn’t just wildly incompetent, with Dunning–Kruger ignorance dressed up as confidence and loud rhetoric. He is also a blatant liar and a notorious, unrepentant distorter of Scripture who knowingly twists Bible verses and honestly anything related to the Christian faith just to manufacture cheap “gotcha” moments for clicks. In this clip, he shamelessly claims that Jesus teaches we will receive 100 wives in heaven. ONE HUNDRED, chat! His proof text? Matthew 19:29. He knows very well that is not what Christ is saying...

@AngelloGua65392 Yep

@ExploringReali2 Are you talking about Philo’s heavenly man?

Has a Muslim ever told you that 1 Corinthians 8:6 refutes Jesus being God? In this video, I show how it actually proves He is the God of Israel: m.youtube.com/watch?v=4FzvfR…

Dude's compulsive lying and blatant illiteracy make him incapable of understanding even one clear sentence. Tertullian warns that a pagan husband would inevitably obstruct/twist/slander even the most innocent Christian practices, including the simple holy kiss of fellowship among believers. And here is a devoted follower of that 7th-century pedophilic, al-zutt pagan, serving as living proof that Tertullian was dead right about the inevitable clash.

@IjazTheTrini @theIslampill @BruceSaiFun Imagine you’re saying “Tan” but start it with a Th sound. So Th-an

@ExploringReali2 @theIslampill @BruceSaiFun btw how do I pronounce your first name? Is it "Tan" or "Dan"?

I challenged 5 Christian polemicists to a debate, only one responded (& agreed to do a debate), even @BruceSaiFun became mute upon my challenge. They're not serious, they do not care about the Bible or about its transmission & unreliability.

@IjazTheTrini @theIslampill @BruceSaiFun Yeah I don’t really do debates. I’m more of a researcher and suck at rhetoric and all that. Lol I’m more of a “slowly write academic responses to each other” kind of guy.

@theIslampill @BruceSaiFun @ExploringReali2 From what I know, I don't think he's a debater? I could be wrong on that.

@UnApologeticsDS @Deenresponds Yo I’ve been wanting to get in touch actually. Can I DM you?

@ExploringReali2 @Deenresponds Than, you know it won’t happen. It simply won’t. I spoke with Jake on a livestream with Thaddeus and David for like three hours, and even then Jake struggled to give coherent answers to my questions. Jake is WAY ahead of Deen, so that goes to show you!

@dromar4truth @Deenresponds @Haqiqatjou IF (and that’s a big if) my argument is successfully, then yes. I’ve taken a lot of time to think of objections to it, so I’m looking forward to the interactions and responses that will come.

Thanks for responding. Question: Do you mean your potential video sort of bypasses (1) my Star Wars defeater to the dilemma or (2) the point that @Haqiqatjou and so many point out that the word “confirm” is not univocal and that historically almost all have not interpreted “confirms” in the way you and Mike and a handful of others have been recently arguing for?

@dromar4truth @Deenresponds My version of the Islamic dilemma sort of bypasses this. I’ll have a video out on this next month hopefully

@ExploringReali2 @Deenresponds Than, why don’t you engage with my responses after I spoke to you and Mike? When I wrote “interested,” I meant “interpreted.” x.com/dromar4truth/s…

All of this is false. I’ll record a short respond this week.