Johnny’s View

I’m not sure why this is so hard to understand. I know what a DA is. That doesn’t change the point. On-court fouls are handled by NBA refs and the league. Actual fights or assaults outside MSG are handled by police, prosecutors, and the courts. Those are two completely different lanes. It doesn’t matter if the person speaking is a DA, a judge, an Oscar-winning actor, or a singer. Their title doesn’t decide what is or isn’t a flagrant foul. The NBA does. Mixing fan violence outside the arena with an on-court play doesn’t make your point stronger — it just makes the logic messy.

@JDeeperLook Hey man, so ‘DA’ stands for district attorney. He is literally the city’s top prosecutor.

Dozens of viral videos of mobs of people jumping Spurs fans outside the Garden The actual DA of Manhattan to the newspaper: “Waaaah waaaah Wemby pushed Bwunson” Just an unbelievable display of loser behavior across the board

@JoshTooJolly The easiest way to end the debate is to stop telling stories and let the evidence speak for itself .

Victor Wembanyama is the most interesting, intelligent, charismatic, eccentric, talented, hardworking, & dignified young superstar in the history of team sports. The slander against him is abhorrent. All because he committed the ultimate sin in sports media: compete against NY.

With all due respect, I’m honestly disappointed by this take. Nobody is questioning Wemby’s talent, toughness, competitiveness, or desire to win. That was never the issue. The conversation is about one specific play and whether it should’ve been reviewed or upgraded to a flagrant foul. Nobody is seriously saying he should be jailed. That’s just an exaggerated way to dodge the actual discussion. As a reporter, the standard should be truth and fairness, not just framing things for engagement. If the only move is to push a narrative and chase reactions, then that feels more like content creation than journalism.

“WEMBY IS TOO SKINNY, TOO SOFT, JUST BEAT HIM UP, HE’LL BE DISMEMBERED BY PLAYOFF HOOPS” Wemby: *pushes a guy off him in the Finals while getting grabbed every play “WEMBY SHOULD BE JAILED FOR ASSAULT”

Honestly, I really respect the way you’re looking at this. I think you nailed the bigger issue here. Like I’ve said before, the Spurs are clearly trying to raise the physicality and make this a tougher, more aggressive series. The Knicks have to stop complaining and accept that challenge — not just in Game 4 at MSG, but for the rest of the series. San Antonio already showed this against OKC in the Western Conference Finals. This isn’t just about X’s and O’s or shooting percentages. It’s about mindset. When the game turns physical, you can’t keep trying to play polite basketball and act like the league’s model student. Nobody is saying the Knicks should try to hurt anyone. But if the opponent is bringing contact, pressure, and aggression, then you either respond or you get pushed around. Strong teams don’t just complain. They adjust, fight back, and write the story themselves — because at the end of the day, the winners control the narrative.

Wemby isn’t stupid, he knows nobody is suspending the new face of the league for the highest rated Finals games this decade. It’s creating perverse incentives across the board — even calling obvious flagrants as common fouls in-game risks having to review and upgrade then.

Just get rid of the stupid automatic suspension rule that no commissioner would ever have enforced on a superstar! He’s called their bluff, the rule effectively encourages unlimited flagrants now.

When the opponent raises the physicality and starts playing through contact, the Knicks have to accept that challenge and be more aggressive. Wemby has already had plenty of controversial moments in these playoffs, and I’m not even going to list all of them. But for the Knicks, the bigger point is this: the Spurs used physicality in the Western Conference Finals to build energy, confidence, and momentum, and it clearly changed parts of the game. Game 4 is at MSG. Now that the league isn’t upgrading Wemby’s foul on Brunson, it’s time to stop complaining and respond on the court. Nobody is saying the Knicks should try to hurt anyone, but if the Spurs aren’t here to play polite basketball, the Knicks can’t act like the nice guys and expect to win. Be more aggressive, be more physical, and fight back. If they don’t even have that basic courage, then don’t be surprised if they get flipped in this series. The ’90s Knicks were the perfect example — if you don’t fight back, you don’t get to complain.

🎙️"They played dirty. Wemby swinging Brunson to the floor. There's no way he gets away with that again." The Spurs bullied their way through Game 3. It won't work twice at the Garden. @CovinoandRich discuss on @FoxSportsRadio | FULL show on YouTube

Honestly, Brandon Jennings’ take is kind of confusing to me.First off, the first two games were in San Antonio, so the Spurs were supposed to look better with home-court advantage. Second, this is a 62-win Spurs team we’re talking about, so calling the series “50/50” feels a little weird to me.And third, if we’re going to play the “if, if, if” game, then couldn’t Knicks fans also say they should be up 3-0 right now? That logic goes both ways.

Brandon Jennings says the Spurs should really be up 3-0: “If we being honest with the Spurs. We go back to game 1, they’re down by 1 with 2 minutes to go, game 2 they lose with 10 seconds left, game 3 I mean 30 seconds left it’s a 3 point game. So if we really looking at it that’s why I said it’s 50-50 because they literally could be up 3-0. They’re down 2-1 and they still have the momentum more then anything you would think it would be the other way around but after that game last night it really showed.” (Via @GilsArenaShow)

@ryantristanb @BaileyCarlin

@BaileyCarlin If Wemby had a fistful of the guy's jersey and was blatantly fouling him when it happened, maybe not.

So what you’re telling me is someone could walk up behind Wemby tomorrow and do the same exact thing he did to Brunson to him and it would be a common foul?

After seeing the league’s decision not to upgrade Wemby’s foul, I honestly felt pretty angry, and also kind of helpless. Of course, officiating is always subjective. Everyone sees these plays differently. But what bothers me the most is that the league almost acts like fans didn’t watch the game. This is the social media era. Video clips spread everywhere within minutes. A lot of fans were not asking for Wemby to be suspended. They just wanted the league to show an attitude. You don’t have to give him a Flagrant 2. You don’t have to suspend him. But when a player puts his hand around another player’s head and neck area and pushes him down, the league should at least make it clear: This kind of play should not be allowed. Instead, we got this: No call during the game. The league admitted a foul was missed. And then no flagrant upgrade. So at this point, I can only say this to the Knicks: Don’t wait for the league to give you justice in Game 4. Mike Brown has to make sure his team plays with more aggression, more physicality, more energy, and more fight at home. If the Spurs want to play with more contact and more physicality, then don’t lose that battle. Don’t be afraid of contact. Show your attitude. This is basketball. If your opponent is trying to be more physical than you, and you just wait for the officials to protect you, you might be the one who ends up paying the price. The 90s style of basketball is the best example: If I am tougher than you, and you don’t fight back, then I win. If the Knicks only complain after the game about free throws, but lose the physical and emotional battle on the court, then it means nothing. The Spurs have already made it clear. They want to play with more body contact and more physical pressure. Fine. Then don’t lose to them. Don’t be scared. If that is how they want to play, then match it. Because once you lose the momentum and the morale battle, the game is already slipping away. -

My view is simple: That Wemby foul on Brunson was at least a Flagrant 1. If the league does not upgrade it, then I have to say this to Mike Brown: Game 4 is at MSG. The Knicks have to be more aggressive than the Spurs, and they have to be more willing to match their physicality. I cannot accept seeing my All-Star player get bullied like that on my own home court. I believe a lot of Knicks fans feel the same way. Mike Brown also has to be careful here. Wemby and the Spurs have already had several controversial plays in this year’s playoffs. I don’t need to list all of them. But in the Thunder series, Carter Bryant hit SGA, and Wemby also had that collision with Caruso. The Spurs are trying to raise the physical level and basically tell you: we are going to be more aggressive than you. If this young team gets that kind of momentum, and you don’t fight back, I don’t know if the Knicks can still win the Finals. But I know this is exactly the kind of result the Spurs want. In war, if you lose the morale battle, how are you supposed to win the fight?

“I think we can all agree a foul was missed on that play… Every game is reviewed by the league office… And we’re in the process of doing that today.” Monty McCutchen on Wemby’s interaction with Jalen Brunson early in Game 3 of the Finals 👀 (via @espn)

My view is simple: That Wemby foul on Brunson was at least a Flagrant 1. If the league does not upgrade it, then I have to say this to Mike Brown: Game 4 is at MSG. The Knicks have to be more aggressive than the Spurs, and they have to be more willing to match their physicality. I cannot accept seeing my All-Star player get bullied like that on my own home court. I believe a lot of Knicks fans feel the same way. Mike Brown also has to be careful here. Wemby and the Spurs have already had several controversial plays in this year’s playoffs. I don’t need to list all of them. But in the Thunder series, Carter Bryant hit SGA, and Wemby also had that collision with Caruso. The Spurs are trying to raise the physical level and basically tell you: we are going to be more aggressive than you. If this young team gets that kind of momentum, and you don’t fight back, I don’t know if the Knicks can still win the Finals. But I know this is exactly the kind of result the Spurs want. In war, if you lose the morale battle, how are you supposed to win the fight?

Should Victor Wembanyama’s interaction with Jalen Brunson in the first quarter of Game 3 be upgraded to a flagrant foul? NBA Senior VP, Head of Development and Training Referee Operations Monty McCutchen spoke on the play on NBA Today:

My view is simple: That Wemby foul on Brunson was at least a Flagrant 1. If the league does not upgrade it, then I have to say this to Mike Brown: Game 4 is at MSG. The Knicks have to be more aggressive than the Spurs, and they have to be more willing to match their physicality. I cannot accept seeing my All-Star player get bullied like that on my own home court. I believe a lot of Knicks fans feel the same way. Mike Brown also has to be careful here. Wemby and the Spurs have already had several controversial plays in this year’s playoffs. I don’t need to list all of them. But in the Thunder series, Carter Bryant hit SGA, and Wemby also had that collision with Caruso. The Spurs are trying to raise the physical level and basically tell you: we are going to be more aggressive than you. If this young team gets that kind of momentum, and you don’t fight back, I don’t know if the Knicks can still win the Finals. But I know this is exactly the kind of result the Spurs want. In war, if you lose the morale battle, how are you supposed to win the fight?

NBA admits Victor Wembanyama fouled Jalen Brunson with Game 3 shove, flagrant review still ongoing cbssports.com/nba/news/victo…

My view is simple: That Wemby foul on Brunson was at least a Flagrant 1. If the league does not upgrade it, then I have to say this to Mike Brown: Game 4 is at MSG. The Knicks have to be more aggressive than the Spurs, and they have to be more willing to match their physicality. I cannot accept seeing my All-Star player get bullied like that on my own home court. I believe a lot of Knicks fans feel the same way. Mike Brown also has to be careful here. Wemby and the Spurs have already had several controversial plays in this year’s playoffs. I don’t need to list all of them. But in the Thunder series, Carter Bryant hit SGA, and Wemby also had that collision with Caruso. The Spurs are trying to raise the physical level and basically tell you: we are going to be more aggressive than you. If this young team gets that kind of momentum, and you don’t fight back, I don’t know if the Knicks can still win the Finals. But I know this is exactly the kind of result the Spurs want. In war, if you lose the morale battle, how are you supposed to win the fight?

NBA head of officiating Monty McCutchen, appearing now on ESPN, acknowledges that a foul was missed on Victor Wembanyama's first-quarter shove of Jalen Brunson and says the league's review is still ongoing regarding whether the play will be deemed a retroactive flagrant foul.

My personal view is simple: In Game 3, that foul by Wemby on Jalen Brunson was at least a flagrant foul. When you put your hand around Jalen Brunson’s head and neck area and push him down, I don’t see that as just a common foul. Another thing I want to say is this: Wemby is definitely different from the Spurs stars we used to know, including David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and even Kawhi Leonard. Compared to them, Wemby is clearly more aggressive. The problem is, he has already had several controversial plays in this year’s playoffs. The play against Naz Reid was already called a Flagrant 2. In the Thunder series, there were also hard fouls by Mason Plumlee and Bismack Biyombo on Jared McCain. Plumlee’s foul was later upgraded by the league to a Flagrant 1. Then there was the collision with Alex Caruso, and also the play where Carter Bryant hit SGA, which became a major turning point in that Thunder series. Of course, every play can be interpreted differently. But when you add everything up in this year’s playoffs, the Spurs — or Wemby — have had quite a few controversial moments. My feeling is that the league has mostly let these things go. But now we are on the NBA Finals stage. If the league still allows this to continue, then eventually the players will have to handle it themselves. I don’t want to see the NBA Finals get out of control. And I don’t think that is good for the NBA. But if the league is still going to sit back and do nothing, then I want to say this to Knicks head coach Mike Brown: Game 4 is at home. The Knicks need to make Wemby feel a higher level of physicality. In simple terms, the Knicks need to be more aggressive. When the opponent keeps increasing the physical contact, and things are starting to get close to the edge, the Knicks cannot lose the energy battle at home. I also cannot accept seeing an All-Star player on my team get bullied like that. That is something Mike Brown, and really the entire Knicks team, have to face. Because the Spurs already used this kind of approach in the Thunder series. -

@clipfullyloaded Keaton Wagler Brayden Burries Darius Acuff Jr. Mikel Brown Jr. Kingston Flemings

How would you rank these 5 players?

I don’t really think Zuby Ejiofor fits the Nuggets. Or to say it more accurately, I don’t really understand what the Nuggets are trying to do if they draft him. A lot of mock drafts are probably just looking at the best player available at that spot. I get that. But that’s not really how I’m looking at this. Denver is not a rebuilding team. This is still a team built around Nikola Jokić, and if you’re using a first-round pick, even at No. 26, I think the question has to be simple: What problem does this player actually solve? And with Zuby, I’m not sure he solves the problem Denver really has. The bigger issue to me is that I still don’t really know what kind of basketball the Nuggets want to play. Last offseason, when they got Jonas Valančiūnas, David Adelman talked about using him with Jokić at certain points. He talked about the idea of playing two bigs. He talked about high-low actions. He even mentioned wanting to see how smaller defenders would deal with Valančiūnas, because if you put a smaller guy on him, he can punish that guy on the offensive glass and around the basket. And honestly, that made sense to me.Jokić can space the floor. He can pass. Valančiūnas can screen, rebound, post up, and put pressure on smaller lineups. On paper, there was at least an idea there. But then the playoffs came, and Denver didn’t really use it. The Nuggets were missing Peyton Watson and Aaron Gordon, their frontcourt was getting hit hard, the paint was a problem, the rebounding was a problem — and even then, they still didn’t really go to the Jokić-Valančiūnas pairing. Valančiūnas is making around $10 million, and in the playoffs he basically came off the bench, played a few minutes, and mostly just backed up Jokić. So that’s where I’m confused. If you don’t even trust Valančiūnas, a veteran center, to play real minutes next to Jokić, then why would you draft another frontcourt player like Zuby? Some people will say, “Well, Jokić and Valančiūnas together would have defensive problems.” Sure. I get that. Two-big lineups can have issues. Lateral quickness, pick-and-roll defense, rotations, all of that matters. But defense is not just one or two players. Defense is a team structure. And my question is: when Denver didn’t play Valančiūnas, did the defense suddenly get fixed? Did the paint suddenly get protected? Did the rebounding suddenly become fine? No. Not really. So to me, this isn’t just about Valančiūnas. It’s about the whole frontcourt logic. Denver already has Aaron Gordon, Peyton Watson, Zeke Nnaji, DaRon Holmes, and Jonas Valančiūnas. Nnaji is making over $7 million and barely played in the playoffs. Holmes is also a young frontcourt player the team already invested in. If Gordon is still here, and Watson is still here, then how many frontcourt players does this team need? That’s what I don’t understand. Unless the Nuggets are clearly planning to play more double-big lineups, more high-low offense, more size, more offensive rebounding, more frontcourt pressure — then drafting another 4/5 type just feels redundant. Zuby is not a bad player. He plays hard. He has energy. He has size. He has defensive tools. But for Denver specifically, I just don’t see the fit right now. Unless Denver makes another move, or unless they are seriously changing the way they want to play, I don’t see why he should be the pick at No. 26. -

ALLCITY Draft Expert @Will_Gottlieb has the Nuggets taking Zuby Ejiofor in his new mock. "Ejiofor is exactly the type of player Denver needs to improve their size, athleticism, effort & defense issues." - 6-9 PF/C - Switchable defender - High motor 🔗 thednvr.com/nba-mock-draft…

NBA Finals Game 3 pregame notes. Let’s start from the Knicks’ side. First thing: Mike Brown’s biggest job is to protect KAT. The Knicks cannot let Karl-Anthony Towns get into foul trouble. In Game 2, the numbers already told the story. When KAT was on the floor and when he wasn’t, the difference was very clear. His on-court net rating was +15.5. And honestly, he is the most important player if the Knicks want to play five-out. Because he can shoot, he can pass, and he can attack off the dribble. Especially when he is matched up with Wembanyama, KAT’s drives can also create the kind of problem the Spurs really don’t want to deal with: getting Wemby into foul trouble. So if the Knicks want to take care of business at home and move one win away from the title, KAT absolutely cannot get into foul trouble. Second thing: reduce Jalen Brunson’s workload. The Knicks can’t keep asking Brunson to bring the ball up from the backcourt by himself every possession. The Spurs’ backcourt guys, whether it’s Castle, Harper, or the others, have a lot of speed, explosiveness, and defensive pressure. We already saw that in the Western Conference Finals when they guarded SGA. To put it simply, Brunson’s legs need to be saved for the second half and especially the fourth quarter. Because when it comes to crunch time, Brunson has never really disappointed Knicks fans. Third thing: the Knicks need to let KAT run more of the offense, whether he is at the high post or the low post. That gives Brunson a chance to attack on the second side, instead of having to go one-on-one every time against the Spurs’ first line of defense, which is one of their strengths. That should help Brunson be more efficient offensively. If KAT is at the high post, OG Anunoby and Mikal Bridges will have more chances to cut. KAT has passing vision, and he is also a shooting threat. So when he is making plays from the high post, the Knicks’ offense becomes more layered. If KAT is in the low post, whether he is facing Wemby or another Spurs player, he should have an advantage in size, strength, or positioning. And that is when the Spurs have to make a decision: do they send a double team or not? Personally, I think in that situation, the other Knicks players will be able to score more efficiently. Also, besides keeping their five-out spacing, the Knicks should use Landry Shamet more if possible. His off-ball gravity puts a lot of pressure on the Spurs. When the Spurs played the Thunder, they were very comfortable guarding face-up offense. So against San Antonio, the Knicks should keep using strong-side and weak-side actions, keep moving without the ball, and make the spacing and positioning on the floor work in their favor. Landry Shamet and Miles McBride are both guys who are not afraid to shoot from the outside. Especially Shamet. As long as he can keep shooting the way he has been shooting, the Knicks need to use him more on offense. The last thing for the Knicks is something we have talked about again and again, even before this series started. We talked about it when the Thunder played the Spurs, when the Wolves played the Spurs, When San Antonio runs pick-and-roll, or double screens, as long as Wemby is involved as a screener, the Knicks’ number one rule defensively has to be this: Do not let Wemby roll freely into the paint. Someone has to stay attached to him. Even if that means giving up some three-point looks to the Spurs, you still have to do it. Because he is Wemby. He is an alien. That is the price you have to pay. To put it even more simply: make the Spurs prove they can beat you with threes. Do not let Wemby beat you in the paint. Honestly, the Knicks did a great job with this in the first two games. They need to keep doing it. Now let’s talk about the Spurs. The simplest point is this: the outside shooting has to get back to a normal level. Through the first two games, the Spurs are only shooting 30.6% from three as a team. With that kind of three-point shooting, it is very hard for Wemby to roll cleanly into the paint after a screen. The second point is probably the harshest one. The Spurs’ offense has been too simple. From the regular season all the way to the Finals, their main starting point on offense has been pick-and-roll. But honestly, starting from the Thunder series, Oklahoma City already defended San Antonio’s pick-and-roll very well. Whether it was OKC or now the Knicks, both teams have basically chosen to sit back in drop coverage against the Spurs’ pick-and-roll. The Knicks are even willing to leave one Spurs player on the weak side open, just to step in and take away Wemby’s rolling lane. The problem is, San Antonio’s main ball handlers and core players have not shot the ball well enough in this series. De’Aaron Fox, Stephon Castle, Devin Vassell, Dylan Harper, and even Wemby — their three-point shooting in this series has not been ideal. So in this situation, if the Spurs’ offense still starts with nothing but pick-and-roll, then unless they shoot over 40% from three, or even better than that, I personally think it is going to be very hard for them — not just in Game 3, but in every game after that. At the end of the day, if they don’t change this, it is hard to see them going much further in this series. Also, when the spacing is not there, that means even if Wemby catches the ball around the elbow, he still does not have enough room to operate. Because once he puts the ball on the floor, it becomes much easier for the defense to force a turnover. That is why Mitch Johnson needs to create more strong-side and weak-side actions. Why is that so important? Because you have to make the Knicks’ defense move. This team has Julian Champagnie and Devin Vassell. Those two guys can move without the ball, and they can attack after the catch. There are definitely actions you can draw up for them. Otherwise, if every possession is just another pick-and-roll, the offense becomes too predictable. And from the opponent’s point of view, that is much easier to defend. Third thing: secure the defensive rebounds. The Spurs are at their best when they can get out and run in transition. But in both of the first two games, they lost the second-chance points battle to the Knicks. In Game 2, the Spurs gave up 10 offensive rebounds to New York. That was one of the reasons they lost the game. So Mitch Johnson has to think about one question: Should the Spurs keep using the one-big, four-small lineup? The Spurs did use two-big lineups during the regular season. So with the rebounding becoming a problem right now, I think it is at least worth considering. And with two bigs on the floor, the Spurs also don’t have to worry as much about Wemby getting pulled away from the paint and leaving the team without a final line of defense at the rim. Now, I have to be honest. From the Western Conference Finals against the Thunder to this Finals series against the Knicks, Luke Kornet has not been especially impressive. Because when the Knicks defend Wemby, a player who actually has range, they are already choosing to sit back in drop coverage. So if they are willing to do that against Wemby, they are definitely going to do it against Kornet. That is why I really want to see Mitch Johnson try something different. I want to see Kelly Olynyk get a chance. He has size, he can shoot, and most importantly, he can stand at the high post and pass. That means he can run hand-off actions with Vassell, Champagnie, and other players. And he can also give the Spurs some high-low looks with Wemby. This is not just about the Finals. It also matters for the Spurs’ draft plans and free agency decisions. What I’m trying to say is this:Everything starts with trying something different. That is the only way you find out if there is another solution. Otherwise, the only thing that changes is the shooting percentage. Let me use KAT as an example. In Game 4 of the first-round series against the Hawks, the Knicks adjusted the way they used him. He started making plays more from the high post, instead of just popping out for threes after a pick-and-roll. That small-looking adjustment helped the Knicks reach the Finals. And what’s interesting is, after the first three games of that Knicks-Hawks series, Atlanta was up 2-1. But in the end, the Knicks were the team that advanced. The final point, and maybe the most important one: If the Spurs want to win, their mentality has to be strong. They lost the last game because of turnovers and because the final shot did not go in. And they lost that game at home. For a young team, that kind of loss has to hurt. The Spurs are a relatively young team. Just getting to the NBA Finals is already not easy. But once you are on this stage, no player and no team wants to lose. So what I really want to see is them playing freely, and even enjoying the game. Don’t forget, Game 3 is at Madison Square Garden. It is the Knicks’ home court, and the U.S. President is expected to be in the building. In other words, at this point, skill and talent are not the only things that matter anymore. For the young Spurs players, every game from here is also about heart. It is about handling pressure. -

The biggest difference now is KAT’s playmaking from the high post. That makes his shooting even more dangerous. Sabonis and Sengun are great examples of bigs who can run offense from the high post, but they don’t have KAT’s shooting range. So when you guard KAT, you have a real problem. If you play too far back, he can shoot the three. If you press up too much, he can attack off the dribble. And once the Knicks have enough size and cutting ability around him, KAT at the high post becomes even more dangerous. That’s why this version of New York is so hard to guard. It reminds me a bit of Denver’s title team with Jokic, Michael Porter Jr., Aaron Gordon, KCP, and Jamal Murray. Different players, of course, but the idea is similar: five-out spacing, size, passing, cutting, and no easy defensive answer.

This is the version of KAT we all envisioned when he was the GM survey pick for “player you’d build a franchise around” in back to back years. Just a totally unsolvable offensive weapon.

Halftime: KAT already has 17 points, 3 threes, and 3 assists. He also dunked right in front of Wemby. KAT has been great tonight. This is exactly what I was talking about before: the Knicks might be the first team on the Spurs’ title path that can really put pressure on their defense with a 5-out offense. The KAT vs Wemby matchup is a perfect example. If Wemby comes all the way out to guard KAT, players like Bridges and Anunoby can cut behind him. If Wemby stays near the paint, KAT can punish him from three. No matter who wins this game or this series, I think the Knicks’ offense can give Western Conference teams a real example to study. If you want to beat the Spurs, the best answer might be 5-out offense.

@espn KAT looked like a real modern unicorn there — he can shoot, pass, play inside, and still put you on a poster.

Karl-Anthony Towns going right at Wemby 😳