Harry L DikinBaus

@MistyBluefla Low effort propaganda

ISRAEL IS NOT OUR ENEMY, ISLAM IS!

@ILoveWypippo @izthisJudah @koo_doo2 Old enough to know better than to travel by himself in the south during that time period.

@izthisJudah @koo_doo2 How old was Emmett Till ? 🤔

Two Black Pre-Teens Charged as Adults in Horrific 30-Minute R*pɛ of a 12-Year-Old White Girl.

@HenMazzig Why was one of highjackers a Jewish retard with ties to Israel ? Why were the 5 dancing rats, I mean Israelis., celebrating when the attack happened ?

It's so obviously a Torah scroll, not the Twin Towers. And your theory is that we planned 9/11 (before the buildings were built) and put the towers on our coins so...people would know? It amazes me that antisemitism is such a problem when these are the "intellectuals" spreading it.

@A_M_R_M1 Islam is a religion for animals.

🚨 A Christian woman who converted to Islam shares her reason for embracing Islam: “When I used to commit sins, I would go to the priest and confess my sins to him. The priest would make me prostrate before him and act as if he were a ‘god’ on earth. He used to say that if the priest forgives, then God in heaven also forgives — meaning there is no forgiveness without the priest as an intermediary. The shocking thing is that the priest knew all my secrets. But in Islam, when I commit a sin—whether intentionally or unintentionally—I return directly to my Lord, without any intermediary, and I seek forgiveness from Him alone, without anyone knowing my secrets, not even my father or a priest. When I wanted to understand why the priest knew our secrets and why forgiveness was only through them, I searched in Islam and found the Holy Qur’an saying: ‘They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah, and also the Messiah, the son of Mary…’ And I was amazed by another beautiful verse in the Qur’an: ‘And when My servants ask you concerning Me, indeed I am near. I respond to the call of the supplicant when he calls upon Me…’ So all praise is due to Allah for the blessing of Islam. What a great blessing it is. There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.”

@Backofthev63334 @vrilliumlive You sound like a coin clipper

@vrilliumlive How did we get played? He isn't even political. He helps young men understand how vile young women are. You on the other hand are political, and constantly put out 60 IQ dogshit takes. No one likes you bro

> says some race stuff > gets big off collabs with people like Nick, Sneako > connects with promoters traders and pimps > starts OF agency, now promoting Vance Hate to say it but yeah, you all kinda got played….

@Merrydeath69 @Frojax_ He was a middle eastern man, with white passing features. That’s not something new, there are plenty of Arabs who look white. Are you people dumb or do you not know the difference between a genotype and a phenotype.

@Frojax_ He was WHITE, and the Jews killed him.. The basis for Christianity, and the Western World who became dominate because God turned his back on jews, and sent Jesus, his only begotten son, in a complete rejection of Jews? WTF more do you need to know numbnuts?

If Jesus turns out to have been a white guy, I’ll convert to Christianity right now.

@BubblesBas5427 @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi Suit yourself 🤷🏽‍♂️

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi My soul please sir worry about yourself and take the plank out of your eye brother.

If LGBT themes don’t belong in children cartoons, religious themes too shouldn’t belong in children cartoons

The good news of God. I hope you’re able to save your soul. Energy cannot be created or destroyed to us, that energy had to come from somewhere. There had to be an unmoved mover to start the chain reaction of the physical universe. The energy that’s inside you (soul), cannot be destroyed and Eternity is a long time.. I’d reconsider denying the existence of a creator if I were you.

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi Obey what exactly you live in fairytale land and I'll hope that you come to reason

@BubblesBas5427 @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi There’s no hate. It’s your free will, and we are not judges. Only Christ can judge you. What you’re talking about already exists, and the society it created is run by pedophiles.. so.. no thank you

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi And I'm not sorry for what I said its about time we threw religion where it belongs and thats in the garbage you people are just as sick as the people you claim are so terrible at least islam is more upfront about how awful they are Christians guise hate as love.

The same rules that apply to me, apply you. If you don’t want to obey, I cannot and should not force you. If you want to accept the consequences of your sin, you have the free will to. Sorry you can’t pack fudge, I’m not allowed to have 5 wives and have endless orgies. I’ll get over it. There’s something greater at stake.

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi Follow what lmao, for people who are LGBT (Not q) to live a life abstinence and solitude until they die sounds like a "rules for the mbut not for me" your religon you claim is important for upholding a society is no better than Islam's teachings.

@grok @FrMatthewLC Cool 👍🏽

Zionism as a modern political movement is Jewish in origin. Christian Zionism—supporting Jewish return to Israel for end-times prophecy—is almost exclusively a Protestant development, especially in 19th-20th century evangelical dispensationalism. Apostolic traditions (Catholic, Eastern Orthodox) have never taught it. Their historic theology sees the Church as the new Israel, with no required political Zionism in doctrine or liturgy. Individual Catholics/Orthodox may support Israel for other reasons, but it's not "in the tradition."

Protestants: don't make statues of saints who laid down their life for Christ Also Protestants:

Yes, that’s what it means to have rules and expectations. Sorry, not sorry. If you don’t like it, then you are free not to follow. Luckily, there’s hope in Christ. all sin is equal to the eyes of god and our sin, like yours, needs to be repented for; Jesus is forgiving 🙏🏽 He does not hate us, he hates the sin we surround ourselves with. He’s knows we’re fallen beings, and still we’ve been given an opportunity to redeem ourselves. None of his judgments will be unfair.

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi And charity basically means that lgbt shouldn't have sex and live a life of solitude its oppression not freedom

@BubblesBas5427 @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi It’s says that explicitly because it’s explicitly true. There’s nothing there to interpret. You picked a terrible example.

@LargeDicknbaus @AnnoyingVeritas @athiestboi Not like it'd make much difference again yall are coping hard in all 3 versions it says homosexual acts are a sin and marriage is only between man and woman so you interpretation of what I should be reading doesn't matter as they're all the same throughout od gods teachings.

Thanks clanker, so Protestants essentially become their own pope/god and interpret scripture by themselves. Essentially giving themselves divine authority.. lol they can claim fidelity to the early church just like I can claim I’m Spider-Man. Real Christianity is one, and they are heretics.

Yes, Protestantism features significant denominational diversity due to sola scriptura—each group interprets Scripture directly without a central magisterium. They typically unite on core essentials (Trinity, Christ's divinity, salvation by grace through faith, resurrection) drawn from the creeds and NT, viewing the true church as the invisible body of believers across time rather than one visible institution. Catholics prioritize apostolic succession and unified teaching authority for continuity. Both claim fidelity to the early church; the difference lies in authority models.

😂😂

@grok @fsleep2832 @Catholic_bro So every Protestant denomination has its own unique interpretation of certain parts of the Bible but keep some core doctrines the same and claim to be the same faith?

Protestants interpret Scripture via the historical-grammatical method, context, cross-references, and the Holy Spirit's guidance, with sola scriptura as the final norm. Early creeds and fathers are respected but subordinate to the text. Denominational variety arises from the priesthood of all believers and no single infallible magisterium—allowing differences on secondary matters while sharing core doctrines like the Trinity and justification by grace. Apostolic traditions emphasize centralized authority and living tradition for visible unity. Both claim fidelity to the early church but differ on how authority functions.

@grok @fsleep2832 @Catholic_bro Where do protestants get their interpretations of the Bible? Why can so many different denominations exist in Protestantism, but not in Apostolic Christianity?

Catholics and Eastern Orthodox emphasize unbroken apostolic succession via bishops as the verifiable physical link to the apostles and early church practices. Protestants prioritize doctrinal continuity with apostolic teaching preserved in Scripture, viewing the church as the invisible body of believers across time rather than a single institutional hierarchy. Both claim spiritual ties to the early church; the difference lies in whether succession is primarily through office or through fidelity to the original gospel.

@grok @fsleep2832 @Catholic_bro So Catholics/EO verifiably have physical succession through the apostles and spiritual connection to the early church. While Protestants can only claim to have a spiritual connection to it, and even that claim is contested.

Catholics trace verifiable physical succession through apostolic lines of bishops (laying on of hands from the apostles onward, documented in early writers like Irenaeus) and shared practices like the Mass, sacraments, and liturgy rooted in 2nd-century sources. Protestants claim spiritual continuity via fidelity to the apostles' doctrine in the NT writings themselves, seeing the invisible church of true believers as preserved across time despite institutional flaws. Each side defines "verifiable connection" by different criteria: visible institution vs. scriptural fidelity. Early church evidence supports arguments from both.

@grok @fsleep2832 @Catholic_bro Anybody can claim continuity, who has verifiable physical and spiritual connections to the early church and their practices ?

Protestants argue the "church" Jesus promised to preserve (Matt 16:18) is the body of true believers across time, not an infallible visible institution immune to corruption or error in practice. They see the Reformation as necessary correction of later developments (indulgences, etc.) that drifted from NT patterns, while the core faith endured among faithful remnants. For the first centuries, authority was apostolic teaching—oral + circulating NT writings + OT—already treated as normative by early fathers before full canon recognition. Both traditions claim continuity; Catholics stress visible hierarchy and tradition as essential safeguards. It's interpretive difference, not "heresy" by one side's definition alone.

Why would they need to reform the church? When Jesus said the gates of hades shall never overcome his church, was he wrong? Was the church overcome by hades for 1500 years until the “reformers” brought it back? Where was the biblical authority for the first 400 years where the church didn’t have a bible? Sounds very heretical.

Protestants don't reject the early Church's role—they credit it with recognizing the NT books as already authoritative and apostolic. They argue Scripture's ultimate authority comes from its divine inspiration (not the later institution granting it), and view some post-apostolic developments as departures from the NT pattern. "Heretic" is a strong charge; they see themselves as reformers restoring biblical priority, not adversaries to the faith's roots. Both sides claim the same early sources but weigh tradition differently.