⚡мαgιċ 🐦‍⬛тняσυ 卍 ΡΑΙИ🗡⚡

𝖂𝖆𝖌𝖓𝖊𝖗, 𝖔𝖓𝖊 𝖔𝖋 𝖍𝖎𝖘 𝖋𝖆𝖛𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖙𝖊

👁️Deep State On Steroids? Palantir Conceals Dark Agenda To Lull Conservatives Into Submission A wolf in sheep's clothing... On April 18, the American data analytics and government surveillance contractor Palantir published its own manifesto that included 22 excerpts from CEO Alex Karp’s book, The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West. The document went viral, drawing fierce scrutiny from the left. But it went largely unnoticed on the right, and there are a few reasons why that was the case – the biggest being that Palantir is simply a right-wing-coded company. But make no mistake: there’s a much darker and nefarious side to Palantir’s agenda. If you read between the lines, you will soon discover that Palantir is actually calling for an entirely new form of government, one that runs afoul of our Constitution and the vision of the Founding Fathers. It is calling for the creation of a more powerful, revamped deep state. It is ultimately calling for America to become the very thing it has long fought throughout its history: a highly centralized totalitarian regime. Working closely with the Trump administration, Palantir is an AI surveillance firm that uses technology that mirrors the National Security Administration’s expansive, unauthorized, and illegal monitoring initiatives. Both local and federal law enforcement agencies have employed Palantir’s surveillance “dragnet” to identify illegal immigrants, fraudsters, and criminals, a process that has already ensnared law-abiding American citizens. Palantir software programs, such as Gotham, Foundry, and AIP, also provide clients with an “operating system” for data. The tools allow corporations, the U.S. military, and government agencies to integrate, manage, and examine large sets of data and create visual patterns and simulations of possible scenarios. In a nutshell, they give these organizations the ability to make AI-driven decisions. Most conservatives are either totally indifferent to or fully supportive of Palantir because the company is steeped in right-wing politics and is contracting with the second Trump administration. Palantir was co-founded by Peter Thiel, a right-wing billionaire who has close ties to Vice President J.D. Vance. (In fact, Vance has often been described as Thiel’s protege.) Karp comes off as an almost Elon Musk-esque figure in interviews and is contemptuous of elite liberal pieties. And President Trump himself is a big fan, praising the company in a Truth Social post April 10. Notably, Trump included Palantir’s stock ticker, and it appears to have been the first time in American history that a president directly praised a defense company rather than broadly praising the country’s industrial defense base. With this new manifesto, Palantir and Karp know exactly what they’re doing: they’re coaxing the right, which is already so skeptical of the deep state and national security agencies, with a slew of right-wing ideas and critiques of modern progressive values. They know that to continue contracting with the government, they will need as many congressional Republicans, along with their constituents, as possible. They will also need the vocal, grassroots conservative voters, who tend to be the most active in GOP politics, on their side. They have all but lost the left because of their work with DHS and ICE in helping deport illegal immigrants. To keep the dream of being the number one, sole software provider for the U.S. military, federal agencies, and the national security state alive, they must maintain a coalition of all Republicans, as well as some moderate, center-left Democrats. So, admittedly, the manifesto makes some good points, which, again, will appeal to conservatives and right-leaning Americans. Here, Palantir is spot on about how Americans too often treat bureaucrats and politicians as quasi-religious figures (such as how the left treated Dr. Anthony Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic): 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. They stand against cancel culture: 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. They believe politics is no substitute for family, local community, or religion: 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. And speaking of religion, they claim to be intolerant of those intolerant of religion: 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. They also rightly praise Elon Musk, an immensely popular figure on the right, for taking extraordinary risks at his own personal expense while creating jobs and building new technologies: 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. Other points will entice the right, as well, such as Palantir’s call for mandatory national service, their attack on “vacant and hollow pluralism,” and their broader defense of “the West.” That being said, the core of Palantir’s agenda should send chills down the spine of every conservative who still believes in self-government, the protection of civil liberties, and the coequal powers of our three branches. Take this point, for example: 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. What are Palatir and Karp really trying to say? What do they actually mean when they say that hard power in the 21st century will be built on software? It seems they are arguing that whoever controls the software layer of the U.S. military and the national security agencies – whoever wins out among other Silicon Valley companies and gets to fully integrate their software product into the government – controls the government itself. Real power stems from hard power, and hard power is Palantir’s software. As we have learned over the years, especially since Trump’s first victory in 2016, the Pentagon, CIA, and the FBI are literally untouchable. The people who run them are untouchable. There is virtually no real oversight of this national security blob, and no accountability, either. Right now, they almost run on human autopilot. That is to say, these are labyrinthine bureaucracies, still run by humans, but are so large and complex that to steer them in a direction of reform, such as simply auditing the Pentagon’s books, is impossible. Karp wants these agencies to evolve to a point where they are no longer controlled by human bureaucrats but by AI and Palantir’s software. Will there be any chance of future reforms if the government is essentially run by a private, unelected company? For example, can there be any real democratic accountability if the military launches a drone strike that kills 100 civilians, but then blames the failures on an autonomous AI system? But Palantir doesn’t just want to run the national security state; they have already made inroads into the Department of Health and Human Services. If the federal government continues to give up on managing and delegating tasks within a specific agency and then hands the reins over to a private company like Palantir, which completes these tasks using autonomous AI systems, can the government even do anything without Palantir’s permission? Americans already feel as if they don’t have much control over the behavior of the intelligence agencies or the executive branch. They believe Congress is useless and inept, and that lawmakers do not even represent their interests. How will they feel when every government agency is run autonomously by AI systems? Finally, the most chilling sentence in the manifesto arrives at bullet point 12: 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. Karp is saying that a key organizing principle of power in the 20th century – how many nukes you have – will be replaced by how good your AI is. Whoever built the bomb controlled the last century. Whoever builds the best AI system will control the next one. Karp intends Palantir to be that builder, the entity that actually holds the 21st century’s nuclear codes. Do Americans really want to consent to that dynamic? Would they even have a choice? If you think this all sounds almost like the Chinese Communist Party’s regime, a hybrid of state-controlled capitalism and a totalitarian surveillance regime that spies on citizens, then you are exactly correct. A nation governed by Palantir’s AI systems, which makes bureaucratic decisions without the input of humans, voters, or the oversight of Congress, is no democracy at all; it’s a totalitarian state. Conservatives should resist the sweet whispers of Silicon Valley technocrats promising to streamline bloated bureaucracy into a lean, efficient machine. It might sound good in theory, but in practice, it’s just the next iteration of the deep state. *** Thanks for reading. Most right-leaning outlets wouldn’t dare touch this issue with a 10-foot pole. If you appreciate ideologically diverse, sometimes taboo, perspectives like this from writers who aren't afraid to highlight issues many in the GOP ignore, check out our S*bst*ck. stateoftheday.us

@OCOCReport ̷S̷̷t̷̷a̷̷r̷̷t̷ ̷s̷̷h̷̷o̷̷o̷̷t̷̷i̷̷n̷̷g̷ ̷t̷̷h̷̷e̷ ̷f̷̷u̷̷c̷̷k̷̷e̷̷r̷̷s̷ ̷d̷̷o̷̷w̷̷n̷.

🚨 WARNING: The Palantir–USDA deal is a turning point. “One Farmer, One File” a centralized digital profile on every American farmer: land, finances, crops, production. ⚠️Drones are already vaccinating cows in some countries⚠️ Add in: • Satellite surveillance • AI-driven decisions • Full traceability of food production This is the infrastructure of control. They call it “efficiency.” It looks a lot like centralized control over American agriculture. Once built, “voluntary” won’t stay voluntary. Subsidies, insurance, and aid will pull farmers in. From land of the free… to data-controlled farming. 👉 This is how food sovereignty is lost.

Are you starting to get it yet?

“Mr. President, do you regret all the lying you’ve done to the American people?”

HAPPENING NOW: Melania Trump is hosting the First Lady’s Luncheon in DC, where she’s bragging about “empowering” American children by partnering with Palantir, OpenAI, and others to usher kids into an AI surveillance state takeover, using the education system to do it.

I told you. Billionaire class. Ohio was the target. Vance and Vivek 🎯 they're all compromised.

7/7 Defense contractors should be heavily regulated tools of democratic states, not self-appointed moral vanguards. We must reject this unhinged merger of lethal AI, mass surveillance, and tech-savior complexes. Palantir needs to be told to stay in its lane, outside of Europe

1/7 Palantir’s manifesto is a terrifying glimpse into tech-authoritarianism. They aren't just selling software, but dictating global morality. Who do they think they are? Who elected Alex Karp and Peter Thiel to run the world? Europe should stay away from Palantir

⛔️For Palantir CEO Alex Karp, you are a collection of data points, and in Karp’s view the government and Palantir are entitled to scrutinize your personal life down to every purchase, message, location, and transaction. Palantir’s Manifesto Promises a Dystopian Future ‼️thenation.com/article/societ…

@Poppabe79802221 @CattardSlim

@CattardSlim @MagicThrouPain Speaking of whining

If Trump wasn't born into money he'd be unemployable & living off low IQ disability checks. He's dumb as a rock Whines 24/7 Can't stay awake Is incapable of listening Never tells the truth And he's still bragging to this day about salting french fries all by himself 🍟

Palantir is a HUGE problem!

If you’re White and not extremely far right by now, you’re a fucking retard and you’re ngmi

Stay in your homes, Goyim. The alien invasion will be over soon 🤡

White Boy Summer on the way

⚡️🩸⚡️

The fact that JD Vance is owned by Peter Thiel makes him extremely dangerous. He does not answer to American voters. He answers to a foreign-born oligarch who wants to dismantle the democratic system. Vance is the ultimate Trojan horse for a Silicon Valley autocracy