Caleb Mandrake

5.6K posts

Caleb Mandrake banner
Caleb Mandrake

Caleb Mandrake

@MandrakeStatus

انضم Şubat 2014
383 يتبع63 المتابعون
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@LockeG2024 @1Nicdar Sure. Question everything. But, when the evidence is verified and consistent then it's time to learn.
English
0
0
0
3
Locke G
Locke G@LockeG2024·
@MandrakeStatus @1Nicdar I do not. I only fear it is because of how much lies, deceit and modivation for theft is in the upper teirs. To believe them is to fall in line and become part of the lies. I question everything. Alot has come out about the lies with these green policies and where the money goes.
English
1
0
0
3
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@andrew64584291 @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara Very easy to trace and track. Radio signals aren't lasers. They bleed in all directions. Someone would've picked it up. Nice try, but it seems you've lost this argument. Don't feel bad, moon landing deniers lack solid evidence because they don't understand much about the subject
English
0
0
0
18
andrew
andrew@andrew64584291·
@MandrakeStatus @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara so it could start from earth or low earth orbit - directed at the traveling spacecraft (extremely unlikely anyone on earth could pick up that signal beaming to the space craft).. then the spacecraft relays it pointed back at earth - everyone receives that.
English
1
0
0
18
Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara·
Absolute bombshell. An investigative researcher presents photographic proof that the moon landings were staged in a military studio. He exposes anomalous shadows that prove artificial lighting was used instead of the sun. The US government narrative is completely collapsing.
English
203
1.4K
4.8K
140.4K
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart@JonStewartIL·
PHOTO BELOW: somehow, in 250-degree heat, wearing a bulky suit, with a chest-mounted camera that had no viewfinder, they captured perfectly framed, razor-sharp photos of the lunar rover. Just… amazing. 🙄🙄🙄🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ #moonhoax #sibrel #Artemis
Jon Stewart tweet media
English
115
77
627
22.8K
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@Spanglish1971 Sounds like a moron doesn't know the difference between speed and acceleration.
English
0
0
4
304
Ant H
Ant H@Spanglish1971·
Apparently the artemis rocket is hurtling towards the moon at 22,670 mph while the crew send videos of them casually floating around in the capsule playing silly floaty games…. Now just think about that for a moment 🤔🤔🙄🙄🥱🥱🥱🤡🤡🤡
English
121
85
814
35.3K
DarthFelix
DarthFelix@DarthLordFelix·
@MandrakeStatus @andrew64584291 @ManaByte Oh so trust me bro is now accepted as well. Gotcha. Damn you Hella gullible just taking everyone's word for things. Wanna buy the Golden Gate bridge? Im the owner ill sell it to you really cheap.
English
2
0
0
21
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos. Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet. Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible. Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times. If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet. The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away. Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse. The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible. These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.
English
240
341
2.2K
87.5K
Jessica M
Jessica M@Jesii_ca_M·
Why do some people say the Earth is flat?
Jessica M tweet media
English
1.5K
41
834
60.3K
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@DarthLordFelix @andrew64584291 @ManaByte They brought back a shit ton of moon rocks. There is footage of LRV cruising around kicking up dust that follow the exact parabolic arc of something in no atmosphere and falling at the same rate of the moon's gravity.
English
1
0
1
34
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@andrew64584291 @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara Yes, but in order to relay it through a transmitter...the signal needs to start somewhere. That signal can be tracked and traced. Whether the radio signal started at LEO or earth, it needs to be sent to the transmitter and then back to earth from the transmitter.
English
1
0
0
27
andrew
andrew@andrew64584291·
@MandrakeStatus @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara I said relayed so the transmitter pointing to earth would be on a spacecraft traveling to the moon. It didn’t need to be manned for others to receive the signals as it travelled
English
1
0
1
30
Caleb Mandrake
Caleb Mandrake@MandrakeStatus·
@andrew64584291 @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara A signal relayed from LEO would arrive in milliseconds. Anyone with basic radio equipment, there were many, including the Soviet Union, amateur operators, and independent tracking stations worldwide,could measure that delay and immediately know the signal wasn't coming from Moon.
English
1
0
1
47
andrew
andrew@andrew64584291·
@MandrakeStatus @Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara Radio signals - could be relayed from low orbit or earth to the unmanned craft. Reflectors : early 60’s unmanned missions left scientific equip. Footprints were not tracked! None of the fakery required cgi
English
1
0
1
31
Jason Ai. Williams
Jason Ai. Williams@GoingParabolic·
I don’t believe we ever landed on the moon. It’s crazy how many people agree with me.
English
213
48
894
17.4K
leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️
How wonderful they went back to the moon 50 years after using this incredible tech like this module 😂😂😂
leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ tweet media
English
295
120
1.4K
34.6K
MdX 🕋 🇵🇸 🔻
@FurkanGozukara Of course it's fake and anyone who believes otherwise is utterly stupid. It defies logic: in 1969, they went through the Van Allen radiation belt (?!), landed safely on the moon (?!), walked/jumped around (?!), took off and returned through the Van Allen radiation Belt again (?!)
English
5
1
17
1.3K
andrew
andrew@andrew64584291·
@Default69202648 @FurkanGozukara Telemetry data must be real - agreed. But doesn’t prove men were on board. Unmanned craft were able to go to the moon in the early 60’s
English
1
0
2
180
Who is Ray Epps
Who is Ray Epps@lukdarue·
@MandrakeStatus @timburchett @Jasper_Truth Dude... We already know you live in a fish tank. You have all the fish tank charts. You only know what goes on in your fish tank. Let me know when you step outside and start asking your fellow tank dictators questions.
English
1
0
0
11