Josh Michael

The "Illusion of Choice" and Governance Fraud "Your 'State of $JUP' post is a masterpiece of gaslighting. You are attempting to rebrand a broken promise as a 'decisive proposal' for token health. Let’s address the reality behind these corporate euphemisms: 1. Retroactive Rule Changes are Fraud: You claim that 'nobody cares about their token like Jupiter,' yet you are unilaterally trying to cancel a distribution (Jupuary) that was already ratified by the DAO. Users staked their capital and used your products for a year based on a fixed governance agreement. Altering the terms after the work has been performed is not 'listening to feedback'—it is a breach of an implied contract and equitable estoppel. 2. The Jurisdiction of the Victim: To the team member who smugly asked 'enforce in which jurisdiction?': Consumer protection laws follow the harm. If you solicit stakes from users in the US, EU, or Singapore based on specific rewards and then rug-pull those rewards via a 'new vote,' you are liable in those jurisdictions. Courts are increasingly piercing the 'DAO veil' and treating core contributors as a General Partnership, meaning your personal assets and residency (be it Singapore, UAE, or elsewhere) are very much within reach of a class-action discovery process. 3. Engineering a 'Yes' Vote: By bundling the cancellation of Jupuary with 'stopping team emissions,' you are holding the community hostage. This is governance manipulation. You are forcing users to choose between a reward they already earned and the 'inflation' you created. If you actually cared about the token, you would honor Jupuary as promised and burn the team’s allocation separately, without making the community’s rewards the sacrificial lamb. 4. The 'Balance Sheet' Myth: Your proposal to buy team tokens from the 'Jupiter balance sheet' is just moving money from one pocket to another while reducing transparency. It’s an exit liquidity plan for the team, funded by the protocol, while the community is told to 'postpone' their rewards indefinitely. Conclusion: A DAO is a tool for decentralized governance, not a 'get out of jail free' card for failing to honor financial commitments. We have documented every original promise and the subsequent staking activity. If this proposal is used to bypass the original Jupuary commitment, we will proceed with filing formal complaints with financial conduct authorities and pursuing a collective lawsuit against the core contributors personally. Governance is not a game of 'moving the goalposts' whenever it suits your treasury. See you in the forums, and if necessary, in court.

We’re 2 months into 2026 and it already feels like 10 years.

The Orange Century.

i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k i do not need a cybertruck for $60k

@okx @CryptoKing4Ever lfg okx

@CryptoKing4Ever Just vibes and USDT 🫡

$500 USDT $500 USDT $500 USDT $500 USDT $500 USDT $500 USDT $500 USDT Follow, Like & RT for a chance to win.

@okx lfg okx

@barkmeta Facts

The tariffs were supposed to bring manufacturing back. America lost 108,000 factory jobs instead. The tariffs were supposed to replace income tax. American income taxes are higher than ever. The tariffs were supposed to make other countries pay. American citizens paid every cent. Now the Supreme Court says they were illegal the whole time. And not a single dollar is coming back to you… Welcome to modern America.

BREAKING: The US government now may owe US companies $175 billion in tariff refunds, per CNN

Right now the market is giving it a 6.7% chance that its going to $1m and a 93.3% that its going to zero....

I sold my whole $JUP bag🫡 ✅Yes, I did it ✔️Did I lose money? Yes, I did ✔️Will I miss a potential upside? Yes, probably So… why did I sell? Because I’m really tired of everything happening around $JUP and @JupiterExchange It used to be about community, fun, and vibes, and future... now it feels like we’re constantly talking about money, pressure, and drama and bad decisions ✅The products are amazing and I’ll keep using them, they’re top tier But I don’t agree with many recent decisions: the votes, the community airdrop being deleted after 13 months of users “earning” it (yes, it was announced and planned), and the constant changes that lead to a “team sacrifice only if the community renounces its airdrop” Let’s be honest: Option 2 will win, everyone knows it This is not FUD, just transparency I’m simply convinced I can make more from this capital elsewhere rather than sitting, overthinking, and losing both brain cells and hope🧠 💡Maybe I’ll start accumulating again if I find new motivation or see the right potential

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 White House pressures banks to agree to stablecoin rewards and advance the crypto market structure bill.

@WatcherGuru lfg

“I’m a huge proponent of Bitcoin. I think it hits $1 million. I’ve never been more bullish.” — @EricTrump

If you're wondering why $JUP has only gone down over the past two years… Just 8 days ago someone dumped 2.5M $JUP again I can’t say for sure whether it was the team or Mercurial stakers I also don't want to judge These unlocks were known, and realistically 99% of us might have done the same in their position But there were plenty of wallets like this — and they were blatantly dumping on the market They didn’t even bother using Meteora to exit DCA. They clearly didn’t care about eating $5K in slippage Even though this is a strong argument for Option 2, I still voted for Option 1 — mainly because I don’t think Option 2 gives us guaranteed upside I also expect crypto to go lower from here If BTC drops to $60K, no one is rushing in to buy our bags. At that point, it won’t matter whether $JUP is at $0.14 or $0.07 And in the end it might punishes users for mistakes the team made (tokenomics) I still believe there is a big future for $JUP but probably not today or tomorrow

@weremeow I like your Dr. Phil heartfelt plea. It almost makes me forget that you said in late jan that jupuary would drop after katlumpur so you could milk fee paying users for more fees. No one believes your lies anymore. Way to shit in your own mouth.

@Funded0x @weremeow Same Brother I’m done with these charlatans 👇 No airdrop for running this in 25’????

I brought my family and my colleagues into this ecosystem because I believed your word had value. It’s now clear that you have no self-respect and even less honor. You’ve proven that you’d rather take a quick profit than maintain any sense of personal integrity. There is no honor in a win that requires the betrayal of those who stood by you. You might have the money now, but you’ve lost the respect of everyone who believed in your vision. A person without honor is eventually a person with nothing. Thank for the airdrop...Lord Michael von Bogenberg

forward

@weremeow you announced 4 airdrops and now doing voting to cancel it? its totally fraud with community who traded whole year & gave you huge fee & in the end no airdrop

Meow. I mean this respectfully Jupiter has a sub-par perp product. I ran somewhere from the high 8 figs to low 9 figs in volume through Jupiter perps purely because of the below. 1. Jupiter seemed like a user caring company that looks after its people and a pillar we could rely on in the space, compared to CEX’s and DEX’s 2. The Airdrop, the rakeback from Jup was less than even Blofin offers, but willingly supported Jupiter regardless. No amount of story telling or attempts to shift the narrative will change my opinion. Do right or you lost my business, and countless others. You can run Jupuary and drop the emissions at the same time