Muhammad Sakti Ramadhan

Are you referring to the hammad riwaya of fiqh al akbar? I’ve never said fiqh al akbar in it’s present versions (both riwaya’s) is 100% authentic to Abu Hanifa. I believe the Abu Muti riwaya was circulating with reliability up until at least 471AH as: Abu Al Muzaffar Al Asfarayini (d.471AH) in his ‘Al Tabsir’ (p.184) says: “The book Fiqh Al Akbar, which the trustworthy informed us about, through a reliable path and a sound chain of transmission on the authority of Nasir Ibn Yahya on the authority of Abu Muti on the authority of Abu Hanifa.” Now whether the manuscripts (which are date after this period) are 100% reliable, i’m not fully convinced as there are breaks in the chains of transmission due to unknown transmitters.

@MagnusTawheed @KItreal512 How can we be that sure when no Ones ever Authenticated Al khallal? Ya Egyptian Hanafi Athari that rely on Ushool as sunnah as Aqidah, Ustadz Kitreal, this brother used kitab Ushool as sunnah as a Hanafi for his creed

@KItreal512 @MuhammadAriesto Al khallal wasn’t called weak tho also muhammed ibn muqatil is also in the chain and bukhari has a very strong statement abt him

He transmitted Abu Hanifa’s statements, so he wasn’t wording anything if his own for him to be considered hujja or not. As for weak memory, I already mentioned: Hadith narration has chains, must remember the order, any additions or subtractions in the wording by a particular narrator in the chain, was it عن or direct wording, etc Many things to be proficient. Whereas transmitting from one shaykh i.e your Imam and his own statements is more straightforward. The madhab authenticated him. If you reject that, then kiss goodbye to the Hanbali madhab as it rests heavily on al-Khallal who was not authenticated by any ahl al hadith and the first to do so was Ibn Abi Ya’la, a Hanbali who wasn’t a muhadith.

Hadith narration has chains, must remember the order, any additions or subtractions in the wording by a particular narrator in the chain, was it عن or direct wording, etc Many things to be proficient. Whereas transmitting from one shaykh i.e your Imam and his own statements is more straightforward.

Al-Tāj Ibn al-Subkī (d. 771) responds to an objection that the Prophet’s companions did not know formal logic, attesting that the likes of Abū Bakr and ʿUmar fully comprehended the content of al-Ghazzālī’s (d. 505) logic introduction to his al-Mustaṣfā much better than him.

al-'Alim wa al-Muta'alim is Abu Muqatil’s question and answers from Abu Hanifa and he is deemed reliable by Hanafi’s. And even if Kashmiri said Abu Muti compiled fiqh al akbar (the fiqh al absat version), he (Kashmiri) said that Abu Muti is truthful in what he narrated from Abu Hanifa. As for the mention of different manuscripts I believe Kashmiri was only referring to fiqh al akbar and not the other books? And yes fiqh al akbar will have different manuscripts as it has different riwayas (Abu Muti Balkhi fiqh al absat version, the Hammad version, etc) As for discrepancies of manuscripts within the same riwaya, i’ve never looked into that much.

Imām ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī stated: that the theologians (mutakallimīn) among our companions hold that he, peace and blessings be upon him, is alive after his death, and that he receives glad tidings of the acts of obedience of his community, as stated in al-Durr al-Munaẓẓam of the ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī.

@HarounKanj Some from the Salaf said, that Khadir will be killed by Dajjal, which shows even the Salaf believed he is still alive: shamela.ws/book/692/77

Al-Khadir (AS) being alive seems to be the dominant opinion amongst the scholars, especially the Sufis. The earliest sources mentioning him being alive that I have found are the works of Ibn Abi Dunya (RA) who passed away 281 Hijri. Has anyone found an earlier source?

@KItreal512 @MagnusTawheed What is your thoughts regarding the words from Al kashmiri ustadz? The name of scholar that wrote the Ibaroh above

@MuhammadAriesto @MagnusTawheed What about it? I’m not sure what you’re asking me about here:)

@MagnusTawheed @MuhammadAriesto There is no proof that he lied. No one produced a chain where he is the only weak link and had proof the text contained lies. It’s clear you’re not well versed in this field.

@KItreal512 @MagnusTawheed Ustadz for your information, Sir Asleep Accept Ibn Abi All Izz and Ushool as sunnah and amongst all hanbali creed that he assumed support his doctrine, the as Sunnah, Sharh as sunnah and etc, but he claimed as an Egyptian "salafis athari Hanafi", he also brought this

@MagnusTawheed @MuhammadAriesto That doesn’t make him a liar. Esp if there are other weak narrators in the chain. Even if he was weak in hadith it doesn’t make him a liar. Hence his transmission of his father’s statements and opinions are fine and validated by the Hanafi madhab

Sneako sends an emotional message to Muslims criticising him for supporting Iran and advocating his ban from Makkah 🇮🇷😳🇸🇦 “How can you criticize me when you see our people are being attacked in Palestine? We have to wonder where does your allegiance really lie?”

@KItreal512 @MagnusTawheed Fadhilatul ustadz, what about Abu Muti'? What's be the verdict of him, can be deemed trustworthy or reliable to transmit the creed works of Imam Abu Hanifah Raddialahuanhu? To what Ustadz have came to conclusion of

@MagnusTawheed @MuhammadAriesto Credit to al-Mu’allimi, who despite being a salafi/athari, he maintains academic integrity by pointing out that the jarh against Hammad is not found in the more reliable manuscripts and that Ibn Hajar also said that Ibn Abi Hatim didn’t mention any jarh of Hammad in his book.

Lope banget sama tukang galon Deket rumah umi, tinggal kasih stiker dia udah paham

Old Palestinians woman confronts zionists that were stealing her farm. #nakba

"When missiles are falling on schools and hospitals, when Israel commits a genocide in Gaza, we call it by its name, and we do everything in our power to bring it to an end". New leader of Canada’s New Democratic Party (NDP), Avi Lewis, a long-time supporter of the Palestine solidarity movement from a socialist, anti-Zionist Jewish tradition, used his first speech to condemn Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the illegal US-Israel war on Iran.

No Muslim believes Satan is in a wall 🤦‍♂️ This is a symbolic gesture imitating Abraham who first threw stones at the devil when he was being tempted

>"Najd is between Iraq and Iran. It's basically Iran!" "First they said it's Iraq. Now they moved it to Iran. Basically wherever Israel wants to destroy, Saudi scholars say that's where Najd is." 😭 Daniel COOKS Saudi nationalist Hotha Ali 🔥