Andy

277 posts

Andy banner
Andy

Andy

@OutcometApp

Founder building Outcomet AI-native product operating system Strategy → Discovery → Capabilities → Feedback Building in public

Step Inside ▶️ انضم Mart 2026
11 يتبع15 المتابعون
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
@quionie Building in public starts as accountability and turns into audience optimization. Those aren't the same thing, and the switch happens quietly.
English
0
0
0
5
Q
Q@quionie·
The thing nobody tells you about building in public is that at some point the ‘documenting’ becomes its own creative pressure. Now youre building your product AND performing.
English
18
2
35
744
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
@parmita The audience sees the milestone post. They weren't there at 2am when it actually happened. That gap is the whole experience.
English
0
0
0
6
Parmita Mishra
Parmita Mishra@parmita·
the loneliest part of being a solo founder is that when something finally works at 2am there is nobody in the room to high five
English
36
2
198
4.2K
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
@simonw The junior/senior distinction is the honest take. AI raises the leverage on judgment, not on execution. Which means the experience gap actually got wider, not smaller.
English
0
0
0
6
Simon Willison
Simon Willison@simonw·
This clip captures my favorite 7 minutes of the entire conversation, talking about how difficult this stuff is to use well, the impact it has on junior/mid-career/senior engineers and providing tips on how to respond to the impact it has on our careers x.com/SpiceShorts/st…
AskSpice@SpiceShorts

Simon Willison breaks down why using AI coding agents is a masterclass in software engineering. He tells Lenny Rachitsky that it takes every inch of his 25 years of experience to get it right. Hear his "state of the union" on Lenny’s Podcast! 💻 Enjoy full Episode on Spice:🎧 thespice.ai/episode/a450c0…

English
13
8
69
15K
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
The 25 years part is the key. AI didn't replace experience - it made experience the prerequisite instead of the shortcut. The floor got lower. The ceiling got higher.
Simon Willison@simonw

I was a guest on @lennysan's podcast! We talked about agentic engineering and all sorts of other LLM-related topics for 1h39m(!), plus a little bit about kākāpō parrots - here's my selection of highlights from our conversation simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/2/len…

English
0
0
0
11
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
Most product teams can see their backlog, their discovery work, their feedback. But they can't move through them as one connected flow. That's not a tool problem. Its a design problem.M
English
0
0
0
13
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
The faster you move with AI the more you need a system that keeps everything connected. Speed without structure just creates noise at a higher velocity.
English
0
0
0
19
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
Building is no longer the bottleneck. Learning is. AI reduced the cost of output but didn't reduce the need for coherence. Features get cheaper. Knowing which features to build doesn't.
English
0
0
0
19
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
@AalfaZhl @lennysan @simonw The higher bar is the right framing. People think “AI writes code” lowers the bar; but it shifts it: from writing code to knowing what should be built at all. That’s always been the PM question. Now it’s everyone’s.
English
0
0
0
18
Alfa Zihal
Alfa Zihal@AalfaZhl·
@lennysan @simonw The better your mental models, taste, and debugging instincts, the more leverage you get. But without that foundation, it’s easy to produce convincing…but fragile systems. We’re not moving to “no engineers” we’re moving to “higher bar engineers.”😎
English
1
0
0
240
Lenny Rachitsky
Lenny Rachitsky@lennysan·
"Using coding agents well is taking every inch of my 25 years of experience as a software engineer." Simon Willison (@simonw) is one of the most prolific independent software engineers and most trusted voices on how AI is changing the craft of building software. He co-created Django, coined the term "prompt injection," and popularized the terms "agentic engineering" and "AI slop." In our in-depth conversation, we discuss: 🔸 Why November 2025 was an inflection point 🔸 The "dark factory" pattern 🔸 Why mid-career engineers (not juniors) are the most at risk right now 🔸 Three agentic engineering patterns he uses daily: red/green TDD, thin templates, hoarding 🔸 Why he writes 95% of his code from his phone while walking the dog 🔸 Why he thinks we're headed for an AI Challenger disaster 🔸 How a pelican riding a bicycle became the unofficial benchmark for AI model quality Listen now 👇 youtu.be/wc8FBhQtdsA
YouTube video
YouTube
English
51
73
598
855.3K
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
I spent €10 on AI tokens yesterday and €10 on Parmigiano. I know exactly what the cheese did. The tokens? Id have to check the logs. For the first time in decades of building software, thinking has a price tag. And the weird part is - once you can measure it, you start optimizing it. That changes how product teams work more than any single feature.
English
0
0
0
40
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
We shipped the feature. Usage went up. Nothing else changed. That's when I learned the difference between a capability and an outcome. Shipping is the easy part now. Knowing whether the thing you shipped actually moved something- that's still the hard part.
English
0
0
0
36
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
This is the part nobody wants to hear. AI didn't lower the bar for building software. It raised the bar for knowing what to build. The 25 years of experience aren't about writing the code, they're about recognizing when the agent is confidently heading in the wrong direction.
Lenny Rachitsky@lennysan

"Using coding agents well is taking every inch of my 25 years of experience as a software engineer." Simon Willison (@simonw) is one of the most prolific independent software engineers and most trusted voices on how AI is changing the craft of building software. He co-created Django, coined the term "prompt injection," and popularized the terms "agentic engineering" and "AI slop." In our in-depth conversation, we discuss: 🔸 Why November 2025 was an inflection point 🔸 The "dark factory" pattern 🔸 Why mid-career engineers (not juniors) are the most at risk right now 🔸 Three agentic engineering patterns he uses daily: red/green TDD, thin templates, hoarding 🔸 Why he writes 95% of his code from his phone while walking the dog 🔸 Why he thinks we're headed for an AI Challenger disaster 🔸 How a pelican riding a bicycle became the unofficial benchmark for AI model quality Listen now 👇 youtu.be/wc8FBhQtdsA

English
0
0
0
42
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
"You manage a fleet of agents that code for you." That's the same shift product teams went through years ago, from building things to deciding what gets built. The bottleneck always moves upstream. Cursor is betting the IDE becomes irrelevant. The part that stays relevant is knowing what the agents should be building and why.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Cursor just mass-migrated its entire product surface from "AI helps you code" to "you manage a fleet of agents that code for you." This is a $29.3B company betting that the IDE itself becomes irrelevant. They forked VS Code two years ago because they needed control over the surface. Now they're building a second interface on top of it because even their own fork is too code-centric for where this is heading. The numbers tell the story. 35% of Cursor's internal PRs are already generated by agents running on their own VMs. They shipped Composer 2, cloud agents, automations, JetBrains ACP, and 30+ plugins in the last month alone. This isn't a feature release. This is a company trying to outrun the model providers eating their lunch from below. Because here's the constraint nobody's pricing in. Cursor pays retail for the models that Anthropic gets wholesale. Claude Code hit a $2.5B run rate with 300K+ business customers by offering the same agentic coding at lower prices with no IDE overhead. Every time Anthropic ships a better model, Claude Code gets better for free. Cursor has to reintegrate, retune, and reprice. So Cursor's move is to go vertical on the orchestration layer. Multi-agent management, parallel VMs, automation triggers from Slack and GitHub, plugin marketplace, enterprise security. They're saying: the model is a commodity, the workflow is the moat. The question is whether developers want a dedicated cockpit for managing agent fleets, or whether the terminal where the model lives is enough. That's the $29.3B bet.

English
0
0
0
42
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
AI doesn't hedge. It gives you the wrong answer with the exact same confidence as the right one. No uncertainty signal. No "I'm guessing here." Product teams that treat AI output as draft rather than decision are the ones making better calls. The dangerous moment is when you stop double-checking.
English
0
0
0
36
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
Every AI tool is €10-50/month. Harmless. Until you count them and realize you accidentally assembled a €200/month stack that doesn't talk to itself. The tool trap isn't the cost. It's the integration tax. Five cheap tools that don't share context cost more than one expensive one that does.
English
0
0
1
31
Andy
Andy@OutcometApp·
Shipped yesterday: 🔍 Discovery: Lineage between Hypotheses, Bets & Experiments 🗺️ Strategy: Graph restored across all views 📤 Export: Correct labels & smarter filters 🧭 Navigation: New sidebar & Agents tab outcomet.app/changelog #productops #productmanagement
English
0
0
0
39