RunningMan

Under your wings I stand, unbroken. Your faithfulness, my shield unspoken.

I’d feel a lot more solidarity with the “No Kings” protesters if they weren’t salivating to pick new masters for me and everyone else during the coming election seasons—after which they will retreat back into ignorance and apathy while their team rules with impunity and authoritarianism. 🥱

A cardinal reading the names of children killed in Gaza is the Catholic Church “getting the issue wrong,” according to James Lindsay

@esjesjesj @NintendoAmerica @Nintendo Botted account pretends that the current administration is uniquely protecting child rapists after a peaceful transition of power from his preferred child rapist protectors :(

.@NintendoAmerica @Nintendo why are you working with an administration that defends child rapists

Many such cases

@CptAncapistan The department of justice this country needs

As punishment, he must fight an alligator to the death armed only with a table knife.

@WesleyLHuff Immediate buy, thank you Mr. Huff.

This is worth the buy when it’s *not* on sale. So make sure you’re getting it when it is!

This trailer is absolute gas + Orela fit + potential big points event to tide us over to anniversary = colossal W (math checks out)

We're walking through 1 Kings together. Not just reading it but actually talking it out, asking questions, and growing through it as a community. If you've been wanting to go deeper, you're invited. 👇

@DecampDave Most deserved ratio, and easily the best post I saw yesterday. Absolute haymaker.

Proud of this ratio

Third parties have a big disadvantage, but jumping ship from the uniparty to try building a successful counter political revolution has a better shot of success than trying to reform the GOP or DNC

Freedom and liberty should be the common ground, it is what can unite us. This is why libertarians don’t fit neatly into left or right. They’re trying to apply a consistent principle. If you are pro-freedom you align with the left on opposing stupid wars, defending civil liberties and opposing the prison industrial complex. If you are pro-freedom you align with right on free markets, sound money, property rights, low tax and limiting the size of government. The problem is both sides abandon freedom when it becomes inconvenient. If you are confused on your position, ask yourself if it progresses freedom or restricts it, if it’s the latter you are likely on the wrong side of history. If you actually believe in freedom, it has to be applied consistently. Happy Friday, off for a freedom beer.

The paid grifters, partisan hacks, and bots are out in force—misleading people about the Constitution and the law—to defend Trump’s unconstitutional war. Here’s an important Iran war PSA: Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1550), it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60–90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours. Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly: “The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.” Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress’s approval) offensive military action. The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress’s express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war). The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress’s approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans. It’s for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there’s an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account. The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the “power to repel sudden attacks” but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval. The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack. The fact that previous presidents have violated both the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution does not—and cannot—change the law or make any present military action lawful.

They could’ve just fixed Afroman’s door

We are all Afroman

was this in the drafts when you voted no on the war powers resolution or

Day 1: it's going to take a couple of days Day 20: ok we need 200 billion dollars

There are millions of us who are somewhere in the intersection of "Ron Paul Libertarians" and "Pat Buchanan" conservatives We are the ones who demand Limited Government, Fiscal Responsibility, ending the Federal Reserve and IRS, are Anti-War, and love Freedom Millions of us

Republicans Announce Plan To Keep Doing Opposite Of What Everyone Voted For Them To Do buff.ly/5DPGNed

i see trump protests every Friday haven't seen a single anti Iran war sign yet