@sebkayser@Rothmus Yes. You said “who gives a shit”, then kept replying multiple times. That’s literally the definition of giving a shit. If you truly didn’t care, you would’ve stopped commenting. Simple.
@sebkayser@Rothmus You said "who gives a shit" yet you keep replying. Actions show you clearly do give a shit.
And yes, I read your comment. The clip is still heavily edited, which is why I suggested the uncut version.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus He then smugly asks “How many times did I interrupt her?” as if he’s proven something which ironically highlights the exact nonverbal disrespect we were discussing.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus If Charlie had actually let her finish without the dismissive gestures, she could have clearly made her point. The 'aimless' part only happened because he kept undermining her while she was still speaking.
@Suiris24@Rothmus I'm not denying my condescension towards you. What you're ignoring, however, is the reality of the situation: the attitude was directed at you and you alone, now the tone's been returned right back to your face. Furthermore, I actually established my point. The woman was aimless.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus I'm not ignoring it,you're openly admitting condescension and superiority,which is exactly what the smirking+looking away signaled in the clip. You returned the tone because I pointed it out. The woman wasn't 'aimless', she was trying to speak while being nonverbally dismissed.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus Gestures like smirking,looking away & pointing while she spoke are nonverbal interruption.That was my point. Your condescending replies('lil bro', 'pathetic', 'sorry for your cranium') do the same thing & you're being just as persistent arguing this as the woman in the clip.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus My point wasn’t about who spoke more words. It was about the smirking, looking away, and pointing while the other person is still talking. You’re now doing the exact same thing with your condescending tone & ironically, you’re being just as persistent in arguing as the woman.
@Suiris24@Rothmus My dismissive tone towards your persistent eagerness to argue for the sake of it wasn't like the clip. Here, I spoke. Charlie let the woman speak. You ran your mouth aimlessly, she ran her mouth aimlessly. When referring to mimicry here, you're projecting your own actions made.
@Angelatic2014@Rothmus Calling someone 'lil bro', 'pathetic', and saying you're sorry for their brain isn't the strong comeback you think it is. It actually proves the point, you're using dismissive language and superiority vibes, just like the clip we were talking about.
@Suiris24@Rothmus Give it up, lil bro. Nobody's playing into your extra diction mishap. It's pathetic, you're acting exactly like the woman in the clip.
No sense in what's within that cranium of yours. I'm sorry for you.
@ZachARiah1028@Rothmus Yes, but I still find him arrogant, I've seen many clips and in every single one I felt arrogance, eagerness to prove everyone wrong, I recognize it because Ive been acting the same way and still do. A thief will always recognize a thief.
@Wyrding_Tech@gelber_gamer@Rothmus I agree, but I've seen enough of his clips to make an opinion of him as an arrogant individual, just a personal opinion. Evidently she was already pissed because he kept interrupting her, which does not surprise me. Are you right in regards to what type of person she is? Yes
@Suiris24@gelber_gamer@Rothmus Conversely, the platform is about the topic.
He made an obvious display of shutting-up, but she decided to simply redress his previous interruptions.
No progress was made on her point.
She's the type of woman that will take your grievances and make you apologize.
I know many.
@gelber_gamer@Wyrding_Tech@Rothmus U are probably right,she did not seem very clever,but I still stand that Charlie had an arrogant nature.Ive seen so many of his clips & always noticed it.The eagerness 2 prove his point made him never reach his excellence,once he debated an army vet,he never listened to the guy.
@gelber_gamer@Wyrding_Tech@Rothmus That´s fine, but don´t be arrogant while they speak their mind. Let them finish and then crush them with undeniable facts.
What I was trying to convey is that it's a classic leftist (and therefore female) tactic to bring the argument to a meta level instead of the actual argument because they know they are objectively wrong.
Also, you have a very shallow understanding of politics. You are a centrist.
youtube.com/watch?v=uQOyXl…
@Wyrding_Tech If you love sci-real and reverse engineering you should check out the pdf file Solar Radiant Energy and the Electrinium Battery. You can download it from google, was written in 1980 by an almost 90 year old dude.
@gelber_gamer@Wyrding_Tech@Rothmus As I said, I am on Charlies side, but he is arrogant, there is no doubt about that. I am also not a leftist, I listen to JR, would vote Trump if I lived in USA, love ELon, love Alex J, love Nick Shirley and the list goes on. Was Charlie arrogant? Yes.