We See You, all of you.

Here we have it. #Israel is led by a #pedofile cult.

@MattH_4America I am happy that your eyes finally opened.

I now hate Israel. Well done, everyone!

@AdameMedia They can have #Utah. It has a similar climate to #Palestine and the current locals are inbred religious fanatics as well.

America has 50 states. Why can’t the Jews just have one of them?

@Havnen32 @OmarShargawi Nix, jeg har inviteret din kone over til lidt hygge og du må godt slikke efter som du plejer.

@OmarShargawi Skal i så fejre det med lagkage, dadler og tæsk til jeres koner

Netop her til morgen. #dkpol #dkmedier

@Microinteracti1 It was the best outcome for everyone.

Looks like Israel is about to disappear from the map. Which raises one fairly obvious question: did anyone actually think this through? You pick a fight with Iran, drag in half the Middle East, and somehow expect it to end with a parade and a handshake. This is the geopolitical equivalent of reversing a Range Rover into a petrol station and being surprised when things catch fire. Israel has brilliant engineers, a formidable military, and apparently zero interest in asking what happens in Act Three. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

@marklevinshow Stop lying, jew.

YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really? First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation. No doubt, there are other reasons. There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security. Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not. In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime. This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.

@DonaldBKipkorir You are not well informed enough to comment on this topic in any sensible way.

Russia, is the 2nd most powerful military power in the world YET it watches as US & Israel erases its most strategic ally IRAN! US will never allow any of its strategic allies even to be touched. If Russia can’t protect Iran from destruction, how can any country ever trust Russia?

@haaretzcom Only four?

Four Israeli soldiers killed in southern Lebanon, IDF says haaretz.com/israel-news/is…

@DFUNikita Som dansk patriot vilje sige at danskhed til hver en tid bør leve op til højere idealer end det biologiske slægtskab der binder os. Hvis der ikke også er et åndsligt fællesskab, så er det ligrmeget hvor du bor.

Når emnet om, hvad en dansker er, nu er oppe at vende, synes jeg, det ville være på sin plads at gennemgå, hvordan en dansker ikke er defineret, samt nogle af de fejlagtige antagelser, der eksisterer. 🇩🇰🧵 1. “Dansker er alle som har et statsborgerskab” Dette er, hvad nogle ville kalde at være juridisk dansk. Hvis noget skal kunne definere, hvad en dansker er, må det som minimum være et kriterium, der kan omfatte alle danskere uden forbehold. Men statsborgerskab blev først for alvor indført i 1849, og hvis man er meget generøs, kan man føre idéen tilbage til 1700-tallet. Det ville betyde, at ingen danskere før 1700 reelt ville kunne betragtes som danskere, hvis man definerer danskhed ud fra statsborgerskab. Det afviser i sig selv idéen om, at statsborgerskab kan definere danskhed. En forståelse af danskhed baseret udelukkende på juridisk statsborgerskab ignorerer desuden kulturens betydning for den måde, vores adfærd, normer og verdenssyn formes på. 2. “Dansker er alle som har danske værdier” Danskhed baseret på danske værdier er nok en af de mest udbredte måder at definere, hvad en dansker er. Det er den forståelse, mange politikere bruger til at definere deres politiske ståsted, og det er sandsynligvis også den forklaring, de fleste danskere selv ville bruge. “Danskere er åbensindede, demokratiske, tillidsfulde og næstekærlige” hører man ofte. Men der er et stort problem med den definition. Det er i virkeligheden det samme problem som med statsborgerskab. En stor del af de danskere, der har levet gennem historien, ville ikke kunne betegnes som danske, hvis vi definerer danskhed ud fra moderne liberale værdier, som i dag er populære blandt mange danskere. De fleste danskere gennem historien ville ikke have været demokratiske, og de ville helt klart heller ikke have været særligt åbensindede. Danskernes værdier har ændret sig mange gange gennem historien, og enhver definition på danskhed må derfor kunne rumme, at vores værdier forandrer sig over tid. Faktum er, at hvis danskerne ophørte med at være demokratisk sindede, ville demokrati også ophøre med at være en dansk værdi. Danske værdier er nemlig danske, fordi den gennemsnitlige dansker bærer dem, ikke fordi de udgør en fast liste af krav, man skal opfylde for at kunne kalde sig dansk. 3. “Danskere er kun defineret gennem deres genetik” Dette er en position, som ikke er særlig populær, men som stadig er relevant at nævne, fordi den ofte forveksles med det, der er den bedste definition på, hvad en dansker er, nemlig den etnokulturelle position. Den første problematik er, hvor og hvordan man overhovedet skulle sætte grænsen for, hvor meget ‘dansk’ genetik man skal have for at være dansk. Er 80 % for lidt? 60 %? De fleste danskere har genetisk ophav, der også stammer fra andre folkeslag. Hvis man definerer danskhed genetisk, ville det derfor hurtigt skabe tvivl om, hvorvidt mange danskere overhovedet kunne betegnes som danske. Det er selvfølgelig rigtigt, at mange danskere ofte deler et nogenlunde fælles genetisk ophav. Men det skyldes ikke, at genetik i sig selv definerer danskhed. Det skyldes snarere, at de forældre, som former ens kulturelle adfærd, normer og identitet, næsten altid også er ens biologiske forældre. En person, som er adopteret fra et andet land som spæd og aldrig rigtig har været formet af det oprindelige lands kultur, og hvis opdragelse, identitet og hjem udelukkende er dansk, ville det være ulogisk ikke at kalde dem dansk. Dette adskiller sig naturligvis fra en person, der er født i Danmark af udenlandske forældre, fordi deres kulturelle ophav og rødder i høj grad kommer fra forældrene. På dette plan, ligesom med statsborgerskab og værdier, bliver disse definitioner for materialistiske og overfladiske. De ignorerer, at danskhed ofte er et samspil mellem etniske og kulturelle elementer, og at det at koge det ned til simple definitioner, man kan bruge i studier, overser, hvor kompleks danskhed egentlig er.

@iranXnow I supported it long ago and even more now

Do you support Iran becoming a nuclear state? 1 - Yes 2 - No

@haaretzcom Iran is just warming up.

Netanyahu says Iran war 'beyond halfway point' but won't 'put schedule' on ending it haaretz.com/israel-news/is…

@eucopresident @drpezeshkian Om sorry, but nowhere do you take into account that Iran was attacked by the US and Israel DURING negotiations...

The current situation in the Middle East is extremely dangerous. Today, in my phone call with the President of Iran, @DrPezeshkian, I urged for de-escalation and restraint, the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, and the need for all parties to fully respect international law. The loss of innocent lives, including in the Minab school, is deeply regrettable. To de-escalate the situation, I urged Iran to stop the unacceptable attacks on countries in the region and to engage positively on the diplomatic track, notably with the UN to ensure the freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. There must be space for diplomacy. The EU stands ready to contribute to all diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions and for a lasting solution to end the hostilities, while addressing the broader security concerns posed by Iran.

@DaniscoMark @PallePoulsen Det er godt Bette Mark, jeg er glad for at vi har beskyttede værksteder til mindre bemidlede borgere som dig.

@ThisIsStatsGang @PallePoulsen Det er jo sandt. Tag dig dog samnen.

Samira Nawa har medvirket flere gange på den afghanske tv-kanal, Bahar TV-AF. Ifølge grok opfordrer hun afghanere i Danmark til at stemme på hende. I valgkampen var Nawas mærkesag et statsborgerskab til alle muslimer født i Danmark. Skal danskerne klappe? #dkpol #dkmedier #fv26

@GeneralMCNews He definitely asked for it.

BREAKING: Benjamin Netanyahu claims Iran is actively plotting to assassinate President Trump.

@BoSkibelund @larsloekke Deres blodtørst er lige så stor som Gvir's.

Dødsstraf til palæstinenserne. Ben Gvir kan ikke få armene ned. Hvad siger #dkmedier #dkpol @larsloekke og det danske parlament?

@DaniscoMark @PallePoulsen Intetsigende ikke-svar. Op dig.

@ThisIsStatsGang @PallePoulsen Du kan hjælpes ved at besøge Synoptik.

@MrImranPk Sure. We are all wondering how you all can walk around with those massive balls of steel?

Would you visit Iran once the war is over? Yes or no? 👇

@KarivGilad Don't worry, Hezbollah is doing their part. x.com/rkmtimes/statu…

ישראל לא תהיה כהנאסטן. בכוונתי לעתור בימים הקרובים לבג״ץ יחד עם מכון זולת וקול רבני לזכויות אדם נגד חוק עונש מוות - חוק לא מוסרי, שסותר את ערכי היסוד של מדינת ישראל. כל יום שהחוק הזה ישאר בספק החוקים של מדינת ישראל הוא כתם על דמותנו ועל ערכינו. לא נשלים עם זה.

JUST IN🇱🇧❌🇮🇱🔥 #Hezbollah’s top sniper ambushed multiple Israeli soldiers and k!lled them in Northern Galilee.

@PeterRa58783464 Det er minus troværdigt bare at oversætte Ian Miles Cheongs tåbelige kommentarer, ikke mindst fordi han sidder i Malaysia (som er muslimsk) og ikke aner en kæft om hvad der foregår. Det er fra 2024 og er mindehøjtideligheden Ashura, en shia-muslimsk parallel til Påske.

Venstrefløjen er en gigantisk klovnebutik. Gårsdagens march mod højrefløjen i London fremviste således LGBT-, trans-, Hamas-, ISIS- og Hizbollah-flag i en stor pærevælling.

HOLY SHIT !!!! 🤯 An Israeli couple buried their 93-year-old “Holocaust” survivor mother in the backyard. They hid her death for years, just to keep cashing $5000 monthly in German reparations.