Alex

@Knuckle83673282 @pirooooon3 Also the USA is winning and it isnt even close.

Largest funders of terrorism? By whose definition? They fund proxies. America funds proxies. But somehow it's different when America does it? No. Do you know how many Ukrainians are dead because America did exactly what Iran is accused of? Iran threatened war? Okay. America started war. One of these things is much bigger than the other. America started a war. And now it is losing that war. And it's losing its grip on global power. America is going down, and it absolutely deserves to.

ホルムズ海峡通らずにパイプラインか陸路は無理なのか？

@yamanakanobody They have a reversed sense of morallity. On the right we care for our family first, then work outwards to our own nation, and then finally to foreigners. The go the other way. They start by caring for the foreigner and work inwords resulting in their family being last.

なぁ、何で左翼は困ってる移民は助けて困ってる日本人は救わないんだ？

@Knuckle83673282 @pirooooon3 The difference is the USA attacks primarily military targets. Iran attacks primarily large crowds of people. Iran does it because their goal is domination. USA does it to maintain peace and freedom. Its legitament to declare war on Iran. Just dont want US boots on the ground.

@Knuckle83673282 @pirooooon3 Iran was threatening war. Who cares if they started it? That aside, they are the largest funders of terror in the world, so you could argue easily they did start it.

This could work under normal conditions. The problem for now though, is that Iran will strike whatever exists there. If a pipeline is built, it will be blown up. If trucks run, then the road will be targeted - or even the trucks themselves. Iran is holding oil hostage as a weapon of war. But it isn't a war that Iran started.

@CNviolations Also, your turn aint skipped you get to play no matter what the laste person placed an no matter how much you gotta draw. The company behind Uno really doesnt know anything about the game thry made. lol. In all seiriousness, it doesnt matter as long as everyone at the table agree

Thank you for the cards, we'll take it from here.

The institutional filtering process for experts

@Feraligatron24 @OpulentAura11 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Yes precisely, thats the point of that comment.

@Truth__Tree @OpulentAura11 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind In your own comment you demonstrated that atheism doesn't actually make the claim Darwinism makes the claim Atheists just tend to accept darwinin evolution

Atheists don't care about evidence...

@GigaBasedDad Secular historians dont even question the death and life of Christ. Its the resurection they dont except. This guy is delusional. Even the resurection has evidence for it tho.

Yup

@nikutaberuru Not every American owns guns, but there are more guns than people in America. In some areas, yeah everyone owns a gun, probably multiple, in others, you at least know someone who owns a gun. More violence in the areas with less guns per capita.

日本人たちは アメリカ兄貴たちの家庭には 必ず銃があると思っています。 アメリカ兄貴たちの家庭に 銃はあるのでしょうか？

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Go back up in the comments and look at the screenshot I sent. I addressed this by acknowledging my comment was technically incorrect and made a modifying statement. Are you retarded, illiterate, or just unable to load images.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Yes, you did. "Atheism is a religion. It makes a claim about hos life came to be." And I'm still asking: "But please, let's start with the first one, quote Atheism claim about how life came to be"

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Also this comment is grammatically confusing.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind No, the question was: "But please, let's start with the first one, quote Atheism claim about how life came to be" Which you pointed to a post you made where you just bluntly says "Atheism claim darwinsm" which 1) Doesn't explain how life come to be. 2) Isn't a quote from atheism.

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind What I said was "Is there a claim to atheism aside from darwinism." I didnt say "Atheism claims darwinism" 2 very different things.

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind The image is right there look again

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Thats not what I meant by that. Aside from, meaning. Is there an atheist world view that doesnt involve darwinism The question itself made no claim. This is perhaps a dialect issue creating misunderstanding.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind That's what I said: "Ask if it makes anymore claim" - you clearly write ASIDE FROM "darwinism", as in: "You comment claims atheism claims "darwinism", which it doesn't - then ask if it makes anymore claim"

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind The question was, is there a claim to atheism outside of darwinism? That is is there an atheist world view that doesnt hold to darwinism? Purely a question. And also besides the main point which was below the question, which was just a side thought.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind You comment claims atheism claims "darwinism", which it doesn't - then ask if it makes anymore claim, but asserts it definitely make the claim of "darwinism" (it still doesn't) Then it looks like you admitting you was wrong, and that theism and atheism isn't a religion after all.

@AlanBrown76ix5 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind I guess but its a bit of a extra steps way of doing it. Which effectively is adding noise to the actual question.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind It’s not weird at all. It’s valid to ask theists why they believe in that particular god but not any of the others.

@AlanBrown76ix5 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind I guess my problem is the word "just" in the statement. Cause everyone (mostly) acknowledges that their claims are claims even if they view their claim as completely correct. "just" implies a deeper acceptence of not knowing.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind It does acknowledge it’s a claim. You can be 99.9% sure it is a correct claim and still acknowledge it’s not proven 100%

@HarveyWall15 @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind I dont think you understood my comment. Reread it.

@Truth__Tree @WWHeisenberg66 @erichovind Atheism doesn't claim Darwinism, where in Atheism did you read that? You didn't quote it, which was my question.